| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Stop TB
Thread: HST1 Pending Verification - Techs now investigating high conversion rate to Invalid! |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 148
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
A third opinion was needed on this unit, one ending up Invalid, with all running on Win 7 variants. All 3 result logs were normal-looking, just showing different checkpoint frequency.
HST1_ 000057_ 005650_ AC0030_ T300_ F00050_ S00001_ 2-- Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 714 Valid 28/03/16 18:01:33 29/03/16 09:37:59 13.64 376.0 / 373.8 HST1_ 000057_ 005650_ AC0030_ T300_ F00050_ S00001_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 714 Valid 25/03/16 12:37:35 28/03/16 18:01:01 9.79 371.5 / 373.8 HST1_ 000057_ 005650_ AC0030_ T300_ F00050_ S00001_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 714 Invalid 25/03/16 12:37:35 27/03/16 06:54:09 13.93 393.7 / 186.9 |
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Slowly starts to look like the oddball OS out does not apply. Absent clear log indication, really none, think we can pause the effort. Pity.
Different checkpoint intervals are of course a product of WtD setting and CPU speed. |
||
|
|
pramo
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 14, 2005 Post Count: 716 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Had one:
----------------------------------------HST1_ 000051_ 005072_ AC0027_ T300_ F00072_ S00001_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 714 Invalid 3/25/16 10:41:06 3/26/16 19:08:38 17.65 122.0 / 122.0  |
||
|
|
armstrdj
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Oct 21, 2004 Post Count: 695 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
We are seeing higher than expected invalid rates and are looking into the issue. Will update this thread once we know more.
Thanks, armstrdj |
||
|
|
Jason1478963
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Sep 18, 2005 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
4 Pages of Invalids now and counting.....
----------------------------------------And now 5 pages....  [Edit 1 times, last edit by Jason1478963 at Mar 30, 2016 1:45:46 PM] |
||
|
|
DadX
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Sep 9, 2006 Post Count: 56 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
First 2 returned had errors, then my came in as PV, then the last 2 came in as valid and mine went to invalid.
----------------------------------------HST1_000008_000739_AC0005_T350_F00039_S00001 0 OS X, 32 bits Darwin, 15.3.0 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2557M CPU @ 1.70GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7]  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
It happened even with the HST beta test (mine is the Valid _3 on Win 10):
BETA_ HST1_ 000001_ 000262_ AC0004_ T000_ F00078_ S00001_ 3-- Microsoft Windows 10 x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 714 Valid 29/03/16 17:09:11 29/03/16 19:02:32 1.84 61.2 / 53.5 BETA_ HST1_ 000001_ 000262_ AC0004_ T000_ F00078_ S00001_ 2-- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.00.6001.00) 714 Server Aborted 29/03/16 17:09:08 29/03/16 19:05:23 0.00 296.9 / 0.0 BETA_ HST1_ 000001_ 000262_ AC0004_ T000_ F00078_ S00001_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Professional x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 714 Valid 22/03/16 23:13:45 24/03/16 01:06:00 1.22 45.8 / 53.5 BETA_ HST1_ 000001_ 000262_ AC0004_ T000_ F00078_ S00001_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 714 Invalid 22/03/16 23:13:41 29/03/16 17:08:58 2.18 54.6 / 53.5 The _0 Invalid result did have some strange log entries after a checkpoint restart - there was a sudden spate of checkpoint writing without any progress steps. This is the relevant part of the result log (which otherwise looked normal): [09:20:00] INFO: Completed step 1300000 of initial simulation Writing checkpoint at step 1388331. [09:23:37] INFO: Completed step 1400000 of initial simulation [09:26:30] INFO: Completed step 1500000 of initial simulation Writing checkpoint at step 1564531. [09:29:06] INFO: Completed step 1600000 of initial simulation [20:57:07] INFO: Running initial simulation Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Tue Mar 29 09:28:11 2016 [21:01:57] INFO: Completed step 1600000 of initial simulation Writing checkpoint at step 1600451. Writing checkpoint at step 1617981. Writing checkpoint at step 1623751. Writing checkpoint at step 1627411. Writing checkpoint at step 1627761. [21:27:13] INFO: Running initial simulation Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Tue Mar 29 21:26:00 2016 Writing checkpoint at step 1660031. [21:36:58] INFO: Completed step 1700000 of initial simulation Writing checkpoint at step 1703781. Writing checkpoint at step 1748321. [21:44:52] INFO: Completed step 1800000 of initial simulation Writing checkpoint at step 1874351. [21:47:57] INFO: Completed step 1900000 of initial simulation |
||
|
|
pcwr
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Sep 17, 2005 Post Count: 10903 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
HST1_ 000056_ 005599_ AC0029_ T350_ F00099_ S00001_ 2-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 714 Valid 3/28/16 10:36:32 3/29/16 15:27:42 15.42 170.8 / 302.6
----------------------------------------HST1_ 000056_ 005599_ AC0029_ T350_ F00099_ S00001_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 10 Core x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 714 Valid 3/25/16 12:04:52 3/26/16 22:39:17 17.16 434.3 / 302.6 HST1_ 000056_ 005599_ AC0029_ T350_ F00099_ S00001_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 714 Invalid 3/25/16 12:04:18 3/28/16 10:36:25 25.11 592.2 / 151.3 Of this WU, mine went invalid. Patrick  |
||
|
|
Mathilde2006
Senior Cruncher Germany Joined: Sep 30, 2006 Post Count: 269 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have currently three invalids on one of my macs (10.10.5) Darwin 15.3.0 and I really don't know, why. The logfile looks good for me.I have also 4 valids, 3 in Pending Validation and 3 in Pending Verification.
----------------------------------------HST1_ 000210_ 000093_ MT0013_ T350_ F00093_ S00001_ 2-- Darwin 14.5.0 714 Valid 29.03.16 13:53:55 30.03.16 05:32:47 6.86 298.8 / 295.2 HST1_ 000210_ 000093_ MT0013_ T350_ F00093_ S00001_ 1-- Darwin 15.4.0 714 Valid 26.03.16 12:14:09 27.03.16 05:13:22 7.65 291.7 / 295.2 HST1_ 000210_ 000093_ MT0013_ T350_ F00093_ S00001_ 0-- Darwin 15.3.0 714 Invalid 26.03.16 12:13:55 29.03.16 13:53:49 21.48 122.0 / 122.0 ############# HST1_ 000199_ 000002_ MT0008_ T300_ F00002_ S00001_ 3-- Darwin 15.4.0 714 Valid 29.03.16 05:19:55 29.03.16 20:35:58 6.51 305.1 / 393.2 HST1_ 000199_ 000002_ MT0008_ T300_ F00002_ S00001_ 2-- Darwin 11.4.2 714 Invalid 27.03.16 18:34:19 29.03.16 05:19:49 12.70 345.9 / 196.6 HST1_ 000199_ 000002_ MT0008_ T300_ F00002_ S00001_ 1-- Darwin 15.3.0 714 Invalid 26.03.16 11:05:52 27.03.16 18:34:11 20.92 122.0 / 122.0 HST1_ 000199_ 000002_ MT0008_ T300_ F00002_ S00001_ 0-- Darwin 14.5.0 714 Valid 26.03.16 11:05:34 27.03.16 02:37:03 10.58 481.2 / 393.2 ########### HST1_ 000187_ 000019_ MT0002_ T300_ F00019_ S00001_ 2-- Darwin 15.4.0 714 Valid 28.03.16 17:16:17 29.03.16 18:55:40 6.83 293.5 / 282.0 HST1_ 000187_ 000019_ MT0002_ T300_ F00019_ S00001_ 1-- Darwin 14.5.0 714 Valid 26.03.16 10:16:06 28.03.16 17:15:49 7.62 270.4 / 282.0 HST1_ 000187_ 000019_ MT0002_ T300_ F00019_ S00001_ 0-- Darwin 15.3.0 714 Invalid 26.03.16 10:15:56 27.03.16 15:57:28 20.87 122.0 / 122.0  |
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
FTM, the combinations of OSses and Invalid infer it not to be the OSses alone or at all. armstrdj, is going through the data he has with a fine tooth comb I'm sure, to find the statistical significant indicator, so he can reproduce the fail in the WCG labs... yes more Beta further extending the 'Limited availability' period.
----------------------------------------Edit: 4 days after the OPs PVer state happened, #3 (_ 2) came in and... W10-10586 went invalid (but it may not mean anything... many W10 do go valid as well). HST1_ 000012_ 001124_ AC0007_ T350_ F00024_ S00001_ 2-- Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 714 Valid 3/26/16 06:27:55 3/30/16 04:02:01 29.73 357.7 / 425.0 HST1_ 000012_ 001124_ AC0007_ T350_ F00024_ S00001_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Core x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 714 Valid 3/24/16 06:33:58 3/25/16 10:35:42 16.59 492.3 / 425.0 HST1_ 000012_ 001124_ AC0007_ T350_ F00024_ S00001_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 714 Invalid 3/24/16 06:33:57 3/26/16 06:27:52 17.82 425.1 / 212.5 [Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Mar 30, 2016 10:57:03 AM] |
||
|
|
|