| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Stop TB
Thread: HST1 Pending Verification - Techs now investigating high conversion rate to Invalid! |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 148
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Eric_Kaiser
Veteran Cruncher Germany (Hessen) Joined: May 7, 2013 Post Count: 1047 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Now 60 invalids and new resends because of that.
----------------------------------------Invalids are on windows and linux. I've seen the first invalids on AMD too.  |
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Hope it's not something related to the validator itself. The noted a _4 I have is in fact of batch 1344, 2 error, 1 PVal, 1 No Reply, so I'll let it run and see if it topples to Invalid or Too Late [due Too many unsuccessful]. If it does, it's not batch related.
|
||
|
|
Eric_Kaiser
Veteran Cruncher Germany (Hessen) Joined: May 7, 2013 Post Count: 1047 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
For me it started at 5 o'clock this morning.
----------------------------------------In 3.5 hours the invalids increased to 72 as of now. All short running wu (between 2 and 4 hours runtime). |
||
|
|
Gurra
Cruncher Joined: Sep 11, 2006 Post Count: 33 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
HST1_002082_000091_AC0024_T001_F00093_S00002_1 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab
----------------------------------------HST1_002076_000040_MT0010_T000_F00098_S00003_1 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002076_000035_MT0010_T000_F00093_S00003_1 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002076_000028_MT0010_T000_F00084_S00003_0 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002068_000080_AC0001_T001_F00180_S00002_0 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002068_000073_AC0001_T001_F00173_S00002_1 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002055_000057_AC0040_T001_F00021_S00002_0 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002055_000054_AC0040_T001_F00018_S00002_1 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002055_000012_AC0039_T001_F00076_S00002_1 Intel DC, Win XPx86, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002055_000011_AC0039_T001_F00075_S00002_1 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.6 ab HST1_002053_000008_AC0006_T001_F00035_S00002_0 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.6 ab HST1_002050_000040_MT0019_T000_F00058_S00003_1 Intel QC, Win Srv 2K3R2, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002050_000031_MT0019_T000_F00049_S00003_1 Intel QC, Win Srv 2K3R2, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002042_000056_AC0022_T001_F00048_S00002_1 Intel QC, Win Srv 2K3R2, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002042_000041_AC0022_T001_F00029_S00002_1 Intel QC, Win Srv 2K3R2, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002024_000098_MT0018_T001_F00047_S00001_1 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.6 HST1_002024_000045_MT0017_T001_F00092_S00001_1 Intel QC, Win Srv 2K3R2, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002024_000015_MT0017_T001_F00061_S00001_0 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.6 HST1_002021_000067_MT0015_T001_F00008_S00001_0 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.9, ab HST1_002011_000099_MT0005_T001_F00016_S00001_0 Intel QC, Win Srv 2K3R2, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002011_000039_MT0004_T001_F00056_S00001_0 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002008_000071_MT0001_T001_F00071_S00001_0 Intel QC, Win Srv 2K3R2, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002008_000034_MT0001_T001_F00034_S00001_1 Intel QC, Win Srv 2K3R2, Boinc 7.6.22, ab HST1_002003_000066_MT0017_T000_F00038_S00003_0 Intel DC, Win 8.1x64, Boinc 6.10.56 ab HST1_001938_000021_KC0008_T000_F00022_S00002_0 Intel DC, Win 7x86, Boinc 6.10.58 ab HST1_001837_000096_KC0022_T000_F00024_S00002_1 Intel DC, Linux 4.1.20-11, Boinc 7.2.42 ab HST1_001837_000095_KC0022_T000_F00023_S00002_0 Intel DC, Linux 4.1.20-11, Boinc 7.2.42 ab HST1_001831_000064_KC0001_T000_F00010_S00002_1 Intel QC, Win 7x64, Boinc 7.6.9, ab a = One (or more) other machine(s) reported WU invalid b = No one has reported WU valid yet All short WUs. There seems to be 0 credit for WUs who were reported as invalid by everyone.  [Edit 4 times, last edit by Gurra at May 13, 2016 10:36:38 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hope it's not something related to the validator itself. You might have a good point there. I've just looked back through earlier results and found this much earlier batch example (Created: 05/05/2016 07:33:04). My _1 was returned on 7 May, but _0 has just returned today 13 May at 8:11 UTC - 2 Invalids, 3 repairs sent out:HST1_ 001651_ 000067_ MC0005_ T000_ F00086_ S00003_ 4-- Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.14295.00) - In Progress 13/05/16 08:11:32 16/05/16 20:11:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 HST1_ 001651_ 000067_ MC0005_ T000_ F00086_ S00003_ 2-- Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise x64 Edition, (06.02.9200.00) - In Progress 13/05/16 08:11:29 16/05/16 20:11:29 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 HST1_ 001651_ 000067_ MC0005_ T000_ F00086_ S00003_ 3-- Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) - In Progress 13/05/16 08:11:29 16/05/16 20:11:29 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 HST1_ 001651_ 000067_ MC0005_ T000_ F00086_ S00003_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 714 Invalid 05/05/16 07:33:05 07/05/16 15:20:14 1.83 74.8 / 0.0 HST1_ 001651_ 000067_ MC0005_ T000_ F00086_ S00003_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 714 Invalid 05/05/16 07:33:05 13/05/16 08:11:26 3.15 94.8 / 0.0 |
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Maybe it's better to hope it is the validator, as then the tech-front can fix this [reverse the change], rerun and cancel all redundant extra copies and the project can continue without interruption.
|
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
Just checked up against a very large account which had the last invalid recorded at 08:12:47 UTC, since 9 PVal and 22 Valid were added through 09:52:38 UTC, 10 minutes ago. The flow of invalid was not continuous, nor are the batch numbers pointing at any specific one... all over the place. Don't know how many concurrent validators run for HST, but with just 10K a day, hardly more than 2.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hmmm, still turning Invalid here:
HST1_ 002039_ 000013_ AC0001_ T001_ F00613_ S00002_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 714 Invalid 12/05/16 06:33:06 13/05/16 10:30:00 1.45 53.6 / 0.0 |
||
|
|
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 786 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I had below invalids amongst valid returns.
----------------------------------------HST1_ 002041_ 000087_ AC0017_ T001_ F00059_ S00002_ 1-- ubuntu Invalid 12/05/2016 07:33 12/05/2016 18:52 2.63 / 2.64 91.6 / 0.0 HST1_ 002041_ 000003_ AC0016_ T001_ F00073_ S00002_ 0-- ubuntu Invalid 12/05/2016 07:33 12/05/2016 22:21 2.50 / 2.50 90.0 / 0.0 HST1_ 002041_ 000090_ AC0017_ T001_ F00062_ S00002_ 0-- 8NUC Invalid 12/05/2016 07:33 12/05/2016 14:37 3.32 / 3.35 83.6 / 0.0 HST1_ 002041_ 000053_ AC0017_ T001_ F00025_ S00002_ 0-- S7220-U-B Invalid 12/05/2016 07:33 13/05/2016 04:52 3.36 / 3.39 69.4 / 0.0 HST1_ 002011_ 000032_ MT0004_ T001_ F00049_ S00001_ 1-- ubuntu Invalid 11/05/2016 18:33 11/05/2016 21:41 2.80 / 2.81 98.6 / 0.0 HST1_ 002011_ 000007_ MT0004_ T001_ F00023_ S00001_ 0-- ubuntu Invalid 11/05/2016 18:33 11/05/2016 21:44 2.87 / 2.87 100.7 / 0.0 Paul.
Paul.
|
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
The invalids returned [former PVals], interspersed and seemingly random across batches, but have narrowed it down to T000 and T001 types, the shorties.
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at May 13, 2016 11:22:21 AM] |
||
|
|
|