Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 148
Posts: 148   Pages: 15   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 29280 times and has 147 replies Next Thread
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 786
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

This one on Linux 32 bit had a restart and went from Pver to invalid:

Result Name OS type OS version App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
HST1_ 000001_ 000041_ AC0002_ T300_ F00041_ S00001_ 3-- Linux 3.16.0-62-generic 714 Valid 27/03/16 00:51:19 28/03/16 14:54:03 18.27 395.3 / 460.2
HST1_ 000001_ 000041_ AC0002_ T300_ F00041_ S00001_ 2-- Linux 3.13.0-46-generic 714 Valid 23/03/16 19:36:51 24/03/16 14:16:41 17.76 525.2 / 460.2
HST1_ 000001_ 000041_ AC0002_ T300_ F00041_ S00001_ 0-- Linux 3.19.0-25-generic 714 Invalid 23/03/16 19:33:57 27/03/16 00:51:13 45.22 122.0 / 122.0
HST1_ 000001_ 000041_ AC0002_ T300_ F00041_ S00001_ 1-- Linux 2.4.27-2-386 714 Error 23/03/16 19:33:50 23/03/16 19:36:00 0.00 122.0 / 0.0

Result Name: HST1_ 000001_ 000041_ AC0002_ T300_ F00041_ S00001_ 0--
<core_client_version>7.2.42</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
[01:34:34] INFO: Running initial simulation
Writing checkpoint at step 140.
Writing checkpoint at step 400.
Writing checkpoint at step 660.
Writing checkpoint at step 910.
Writing checkpoint at step 1170.
Writing checkpoint at step 1430.
Writing checkpoint at step 1690.
Writing checkpoint at step 1940.
[02:52:16] INFO: Completed step 2000 of initial simulation
Writing checkpoint at step 2200.
...
[21:05:06] INFO: Completed step 30000 of initial simulation
Writing checkpoint at step 30040.
[22:27:53] INFO: Running initial simulation

Reading checkpoint file state.cpt generated: Fri Mar 25 21:14:48 2016


Writing checkpoint at step 30220.
...
Writing checkpoint at step 99820.
[00:27:10] INFO: Completed step 100000 of initial simulation
[00:27:13] INFO: Finished initial simulation.
[00:27:13] INFO: Running secondary simulation
[00:48:30] INFO: Run complete, CPU time: 162791.518000
00:48:30 (25065): called boinc_finish(0)

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Paul.
----------------------------------------
Paul.
[Mar 28, 2016 3:30:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

hmmm, is it really writing that many checkpoints according your settings? I'd increase Write to Disk time if it is your current preference allowing this.
[Mar 28, 2016 3:33:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 786
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

Rob,

WTD is 5 minutes and this was averaging 10 minutes on a dual thread CPU.
This is a slow old laptop, due to retire soon.

My highest PCs are 4 threads per CPU so disk use is OK at that.

Paul.
----------------------------------------
Paul.
[Mar 28, 2016 3:50:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

Ah yes, now I see 162.8K seconds processing... nearly 2 days... that's a patience tester.

Sorry for the program interruption :O)
[Mar 28, 2016 4:01:19 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mumak
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Dec 7, 2012
Post Count: 477
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

One of mine has gone invalid on Win10:

HST1_ 000102_ 000020_ AT0012_ T350_ F00020_ S00001_ 2-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Professional x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 714 Valid 3/27/16 23:00:29 3/28/16 12:04:14 12.08 368.1 / 362.7

HST1_ 000102_ 000020_ AT0012_ T350_ F00020_ S00001_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00) 714 Invalid 3/25/16 22:33:53 3/26/16 18:25:45 10.94 304.5 / 181.3

HST1_ 000102_ 000020_ AT0012_ T350_ F00020_ S00001_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 714 Valid 3/25/16 22:33:52 3/27/16 23:00:22 13.45 357.3 / 362.7
----------------------------------------

[Mar 28, 2016 4:11:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

The plot is slowly thickening. :(

(The techs hate it, if it is W10 not matching with other Windows, but W10:W10 is, the solution is creating another homogeneity group. Of course it could also be a tweak in the validator tolerances? MS claims hundreds of millions are already on W10, so it is a substantial portion in the market. Jumping the gun, it could be sec the OS having an issue or chasing phantoms)
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Mar 28, 2016 4:23:53 PM]
[Mar 28, 2016 4:16:54 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

This looks like a similar situation with Apple OSx. _0 and _1 were initially listed as "valid" Then I got _2. After it finished, the _0 was changed to "invalid" and _1 and _2 were listed as "valid".



Workunit Status

Project Name: Help Stop TB
Created: 03/26/2016 13:03:23
Name: HST1_000222_000076_MT0019_T350_F00076_S00001
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 3


Result Name OS type OS version App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
HST1_ 000222_ 000076_ MT0019_ T350_ F00076_ S00001_ 2-- Darwin 15.3.0 714 Valid 3/28/16 03:35:45 3/28/16 16:02:27 10.20 295.5 / 374.1
HST1_ 000222_ 000076_ MT0019_ T350_ F00076_ S00001_ 1-- Darwin 15.3.0 714 Valid 3/26/16 13:15:09 3/27/16 18:19:40 11.09 452.8 / 374.1
HST1_ 000222_ 000076_ MT0019_ T350_ F00076_ S00001_ 0-- Darwin 14.5.0 714 Invalid 3/26/16 13:14:55 3/28/16 03:35:30 10.79 490.1 / 187.1
Close
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 28, 2016 5:02:13 PM]
[Mar 28, 2016 4:34:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

Slip off the keyboard... did you mean Pending Verification as first 2 going Valid and still a 3rd being sent out is unheard off. Darwin 14.5 deviating from the 2 results on Darwin 15.3. Surely been a good stroke of fortune to start slow [Though it there's the inescapable whiff of there being PR deadline rush]. The beta were really too limited for a big launch on a new science engine [for WCG]... but that's just my notion. cool
[Mar 28, 2016 5:07:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

I think you were right about the first 2 being PV. Here is another one. I think this may go to a 4th WU because the first 3 are all different OS versions. Mine is the _1.
There are actually 3 different WUs. Two are pending validation and one is pending verification.

Workunit Status

Project Name: Help Stop TB
Created: 03/26/2016 13:03:16
Name: HST1_000220_000040_MT0018_T350_F00040_S00001
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 3


Result Name OS type OS version App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
HST1_ 000220_ 000040_ MT0018_ T350_ F00040_ S00001_ 2-- Darwin 15.4.0 - In Progress 3/28/16 02:35:23 4/7/16 02:35:23 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
HST1_ 000220_ 000040_ MT0018_ T350_ F00040_ S00001_ 0-- Darwin 14.5.0 714 Pending Verification 3/26/16 13:10:47 3/28/16 02:35:18 10.73 487.4 / 0.0
HST1_ 000220_ 000040_ MT0018_ T350_ F00040_ S00001_ 1-- Darwin 15.3.0 714 Pending Verification 3/26/16 13:10:47 3/27/16 01:34:22 10.03 290.6 / 0.0
Close
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 28, 2016 5:39:16 PM]
[Mar 28, 2016 5:29:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HST1 Pending Verification - Please report here exact OS if yours turns invalid!

Let's see first. Normally the homogeneity grouping only needs splitting to the main 3, OS_X, Linux, Windows. Please get back whatever the outcome.
[Mar 28, 2016 5:44:19 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 148   Pages: 15   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread