Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 
World Community Grid Forums
  Category: Beta Testing
  Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
  Thread: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 135
Posts: 135   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 39864 times and has 134 replies Next Thread
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by skgiven at Jul 18, 2012 9:16:30 PM]
[Apr 17, 2012 12:23:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
My only Windows machine is a dual-boot netbook with an AMD E-350 (Fusion CPU/GPU) chip. I received 6 betas on it yesterday evening and all errored immediately with this message:

<core_client_version>7.0.2</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code -1073741515 (0xc0000135)
</message>
]]>

I updated the Catalyst driver before receiving the last beta, but that didn't make any difference.

GPU has 384 K memory; CPU has two cores; system has 4 GB RAM. OS is Windows 7 Home Premium. BOINC version is 7.0.2.

I run this machine on the Linux side most of the time. It runs POEM and PrimeGrid very reliably. I'll update to BOINC 7.0.25 on the Windows side and see whether that helps with the next batch of HCC GPU betas.

(Edited to add system specs)
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by kateiacy at Apr 17, 2012 12:40:25 PM]
[Apr 17, 2012 12:29:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
Now that's weird. Umm.... There is no such thing as 301.25. Very strange.
[Apr 17, 2012 12:34:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
I have a a guess as to why some Nvidia GT 430s have been successfully returning results and others haven't. My only GT 430 is in one of my Linux boxes, so I can't personally vouch for this under Windows. Under Linux, if the graphical user interface is enabled, then CUDA limits kernels to a maximum of 5 seconds run time, and jobs will error if the kernel isn't done in that time. If the GUI is turned off, then kernels can run as long as they need to.

I am looking forward to a WCG GPU beta test that includes Linux! :)
----------------------------------------
[Apr 17, 2012 12:37:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
I searched NVIDIA and couldn't find it but its on Google. Hmmmmm.
[Apr 17, 2012 12:38:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
Hmmm.. pre-release beta drivers...... That's one risky user.... Leaked drivers eh.... Well they're getting decent reviews, so here goes nothin.
[Apr 17, 2012 1:13:54 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
deltavee
Ace Cruncher
Texas Hill Country
Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Post Count: 4891
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
Much better than last time.
6870 = 79% Valid
5670 = 100% Valid
[Apr 17, 2012 1:16:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
Most of the results are back so here are the results of the test:

sc_res = number of success results
sc_hsts = number of success hosts
er_res = number of error results
er_hsts = number of error hosts
hst_rt = host success rate (percent)
video_card = Name of Video Card Type

sc_res	sc_hsts	er_res	er_hsts	hst_rt	video_card
59	2	0	0	100	CAL|AMDRadeonHD(unknown)
17	3	0	0	100	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6200/6300/7300series(Wrestler)
14	2	20	4	33	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6250/6310(Wrestler)
27	3	2	1	75	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6300series(Caicos)
423	23	13	3	88	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6800series(Barts)
848	23	1	1	96	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6900series(Cayman)
13	2	0	0	100	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6x00series(Sumo)
134	7	6	1	88	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6x00series(Turks)
784	9	14	1	90	CAL|AMDRadeonHD79x0series(Tahiti)
5	1	0	0	100	CAL|AMDSUMO
1289	49	110	10	83	CAL|ATIRadeonHD5700series(Juniper)
3623	70	98	5	93	CAL|ATIRadeonHD5800series(Cypress)
71	11	132	13	46	CAL|ATIRadeonHD5x00series(Cedar)
226	16	21	5	76	CAL|ATIRadeonHD5x00series(Redwood)
784	23	35	6	79	CAL|ATIunknown
0	0	2	1	0	CUDA|GeForce410M
6	1	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForce9600GSO
31	1	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForce9600GT
3	1	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGT425M
95	12	36	2	86	CUDA|GeForceGT430
7	3	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGT440
10	2	1	1	67	CUDA|GeForceGT525M
12	2	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGT530
61	7	1	1	88	CUDA|GeForceGT540M
0	0	4	1	0	CUDA|GeForceGT550M
31	4	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGT555M
4	1	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGT630M
160	7	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGTS450
728	25	31	4	86	CUDA|GeForceGTX460
56	2	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGTX460M
84	1	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGTX460SE
140	2	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGTX465
96	4	7	1	80	CUDA|GeForceGTX470
286	12	14	2	86	CUDA|GeForceGTX480
76	4	4	2	67	CUDA|GeForceGTX550Ti
4	1	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGTX555
165	7	6	2	78	CUDA|GeForceGTX560
1	1	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGTX560M
1427	41	192	8	84	CUDA|GeForceGTX560Ti
931	19	2	1	95	CUDA|GeForceGTX570
1194	18	2	1	95	CUDA|GeForceGTX580
9	1	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGTX580M
320	2	2	1	67	CUDA|GeForceGTX590
160	2	0	0	100	CUDA|GeForceGTX680
18	2	0	0	100	CUDA|Quadro1000M
15	1	0	0	100	CUDA|Quadro2000M
[Apr 17, 2012 1:27:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
Ummm..... knreed if you happen to notice this, why aren't my 13 invalids from my 680 on there. They were marked invalid (got credit), I'm getting ready to Download the 301.25 pre-beta that the other 680 host had.

Edit= or are you counting successful tasks as ones that ran to completion? without erroring out

EDIT again= Installed 301.25 and everything seems to be functioning as it should. Whenever you're ready again knreed biggrin
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 17, 2012 1:55:27 PM]
[Apr 17, 2012 1:31:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 GPU Testing - Round 4
More information for results that were valid:

num_res = number of results
num_hts = number of hosts
avg_cpu = average cpu time
avg_elp = average elapsed time
video_card = type of video card

num_res	num_hts	avg_cpu	avg_elp	video_card
55	2	95.0	260.0	CAL|AMDRadeonHD(unknown)
21	3	156.0	1387.0	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6300series(Caicos)
193	19	92.0	323.0	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6800series(Barts)
803	22	86.0	256.0	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6900series(Cayman)
4	2	120.0	715.0	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6x00series(Sumo)
101	7	171.0	694.0	CAL|AMDRadeonHD6x00series(Turks)
686	8	81.0	138.0	CAL|AMDRadeonHD79x0series(Tahiti)
882	44	113.0	384.0	CAL|ATIRadeonHD5700series(Juniper)
2602	69	103.0	295.0	CAL|ATIRadeonHD5800series(Cypress)
137	14	205.0	631.0	CAL|ATIRadeonHD5x00series(Redwood)
496	21	112.0	301.0	CAL|ATIunknown
17	1	78.0	259.0	CUDA|GeForce9600GT
3	1	201.0	7760.0	CUDA|GeForceGT425M
95	12	664.0	1052.0	CUDA|GeForceGT430
7	3	234.0	884.0	CUDA|GeForceGT440
10	2	1157.0	1418.0	CUDA|GeForceGT525M
12	2	739.0	1029.0	CUDA|GeForceGT530
61	7	270.0	1125.0	CUDA|GeForceGT540M
31	4	320.0	737.0	CUDA|GeForceGT555M
4	1	512.0	1534.0	CUDA|GeForceGT630M
158	7	462.0	553.0	CUDA|GeForceGTS450
717	25	271.0	359.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX460
55	2	443.0	686.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX460M
84	1	409.0	411.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX460SE
138	2	271.0	286.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX465
94	4	172.0	315.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX470
279	12	179.0	233.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX480
75	4	357.0	430.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX550Ti
4	1	380.0	457.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX555
164	7	205.0	423.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX560
1	1	365.0	745.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX560M
1405	41	254.0	305.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX560Ti
905	19	178.0	200.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX570
1168	18	164.0	228.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX580
9	1	308.0	344.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX580M
311	2	166.0	168.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX590
145	1	202.0	238.0	CUDA|GeForceGTX680
18	2	905.0	911.0	CUDA|Quadro1000M
15	1	117.0	665.0	CUDA|Quadro2000M
[Apr 17, 2012 1:56:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 135   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread