Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 142
Posts: 142   Pages: 15   [ Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1963123 times and has 141 replies Next Thread
martin64
Senior Cruncher
Germany
Joined: May 11, 2009
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

No problems so whatever is happening the Beta is causing it.

So nanoprobe, it looks like I am not the only one.

Although one of the betas ran fine, the next one again caused the entire system to go mad, 2 other WUs that had several hours of run time ended up in errors. Since my PC ran fine for the last couple of years, I agree that there must be something seriously wrong with these betas.

Regards,
Martin
----------------------------------------

[Nov 5, 2010 12:35:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

Past performance is no guarantee for the future. Saw a note on an IT website with the question: Who's still running XP? 55 Euro's I saw the student/home W7 kit as costing in the shop and our VAT rate is 20%. The smoothness with which W7 runs, if it has to be Windows, gave my laptop most definitely a second life... 2 concurrent Beta 6.35 on the duo and no user perspective issue. Both validated.

Note also that 6.10.32 might need an upgrade to 6.10.58. Clients dont crunch, but they do count for stability.

And OCing... well timing is everything... CEP2 is seeking out the limits.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Nov 5, 2010 12:54:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
codes
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Oct 20, 2009
Post Count: 142
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

Been lucky this round. 3 processed without problems with CPU and elapsed time very similar (within about 15 mins) on devices. I even had two crunching at the same time on a dual core. Intel E8500, 4 GB RAM, W7 x64. Intel P4 520 (with HT on), 2 GB RAM, XP x86.
[Nov 5, 2010 12:59:02 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

Now up to 31 Beta WU with no errors so far
[Nov 5, 2010 1:05:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

Got at least 169 of 'em.

18 or so are "In Progress."

The rest are either "Valid" or "Pending Validation."

Everything's gone swimmingly.

Nice to have the Mac folk included again. My lab machines were lonely for betas.
[Nov 5, 2010 1:10:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

Past performance is no guarantee for the future. Saw a note on an IT website with the question: Who's still running XP? 55 Euro's I saw the student/home W7 kit as costing in the shop and our VAT rate is 20%. The smoothness with which W7 runs, if it has to be Windows, gave my laptop most definitely a second life... 2 concurrent Beta 6.35 on the duo and no user perspective issue. Both validated.

Note also that 6.10.32 might need an upgrade to 6.10.58. Clients dont crunch, but they do count for stability.

And OCing... well timing is everything... CEP2 is seeking out the limits.

It's not really a big deal. For some reason the CEP2 betas don't like this cruncher. It looks like the overall errors are minimal. I'll just let this one crunch on betaless. It's not worth my time to try and figure out why it chokes on these betas. I just posted the errors so the techs could take a look if needed.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by nanoprobe at Nov 5, 2010 1:24:17 PM]
[Nov 5, 2010 1:23:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

aginghippie,

Thanks for that positive feedback. Being first is not always what you want to be placed at when finding bugs and as it is, in past WCG experienced too little participation from one or the other platform to even find a wingman to crunch the other half, in time. Any platform participation does require a certain steady minimum and that's what the techs look at when considering ports. Was it Mac All or only Mac Intel for instance?

edit: member addressed
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Nov 5, 2010 1:56:29 PM]
[Nov 5, 2010 1:24:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

The bulk of my machines are Intel Core 2 Duo (OS 10.6.4). I have an odd G5 machine here and there (servers running OS 10.5.8).

The reason I started crunching here nearly two years ago was the unceremonious dumping of the PPC chip by the Rosetta@home folks. If my PPC machines aren't good enough (no G4 machines are online now, but they still are handy machines on the server side--and they'll crunch when they go back up), then none of my machines are good enough.

Love me, love my dawg.

Funny though. After two years of nothing, I've only dropped down to #11 in their stats.

If you need dozens of Macs in a semi-controlled environment (I'm one of those hippy types so the common control freak approach to running labs is NOT being used), let me know. Our students should see this kind of stuff in action.
[Nov 5, 2010 1:46:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Dataman
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 4865
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

137; no errors.

cowboy
----------------------------------------


[Nov 5, 2010 2:09:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Post Count: 1343
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: BETA Clean Energy Project phase 2 version 6.35

The BOINC client version was the problem one of my Laptops had. I mentioned this above, so if anyone is running old clients, you may want to update them.
----------------------------------------

[Nov 5, 2010 3:58:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 142   Pages: 15   [ Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread