Astronauts condemn NASA’s global warming endorsement http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/washin...arming-endorsement/469366

Amount of ice in Bering Sea reaches all-time record The amount of floating ice in the Arctic's Bering Sea - which had long been expected to retreat disastrously by climate-Cassandra organisations such as Greenpeace - reached all-time record high levels last month, according to US researchers monitoring the area using satellites.

The US National Snow and Ice Data Center announced last week that ice extent in the Bering for the month of March has now been collated and compared, and is the highest seen since records began. The NSIDC boffins said in a statement: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/11/bering_sea_ice_cover/

Thanks Dave-- Imagine there's no heaven,
It's easy if you try,
No hell below us,
Above us only sky,
Imagine all the people
living for today ...

Imagine there's no countries,
It isn't hard to do,
Nothing to kill or die for,
No religion too,
Imagine all the people
living life in peace ...


Imagine no possessions,
I wonder if you can,
No need for greed or hunger,
A brotherhood of man,
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world ...

You may say I'm a dreamer,
but I'm not the only one,
I hope some day you'll join us,
And the world will live as one.

-- John Lennon
They Don't Always Come in Black Helicopters Agenda 21, the United Nations blueprint for global transformation, might sound good to some of you. Certainly it has been welcomed by nations all around the world. Political, cultural, and media leaders have embraced this global vision of sustainable communities, where people everywhere will be healthy and safe, where social justice will be the norm, where our environment is protected, and where our children are no longer robbed of their heritage.

What could be wrong with that? Why not preserve resources for the next generation? Why shouldn't we limit our own consumption and reduce our use of energy? Wouldn't it be nice if we could trade our cars in for bicycles? Shouldn't we be working toward abolishing poverty? What's wrong with establishing a global system that trains parents, monitors intolerance, and meets the needs of everyone? If it would help to save our planet, shouldn't we be willing to sacrifice an antiquated system of open markets for self-sustaining communities? If urban sprawl threatens the health of our planet, perhaps we should move out of our single-family homes and move into established human settlements, where our mark upon the earth can be limited?

So many smart people say that this is a good idea. How could they be wrong? http://www.magic-city-news.com/Agenda_21_32/T...elicopters_978978.shtml-- as you can see if you read this is not only in the United States County Supervisors in Loudoun County, Virginia are considering enacting regulations that would force residents and businesses to turn off their lights as early as 9:00 P.M. to avoid “ light pollution.”

Groups such as the International Dark Sky Association have successfully lobbied local governments to impose restrictions on the strength of outdoor lighting and how late certain lights can be used. In Loudoun County, a suburb of Washington, D.C., the initial policy proposed would affect all lights above 5,500 lumens. The average bulbs found in a residential home may range from 1,650 to 4,000 lumens - but those lights do not include outdoor flood lights or decorative and security lighting. The earliest restrictions would begin at 9:00 P.M. and all lights, regardless of lumens, would be required to be extinguished by midnight.

I was right on the money when I titled this thread


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/rowena...city-squeeze-by-2015.html

Dave i have come to the conclusion that we will not make it out of this world alive--