Here is the digraph as it comes out when I google it. But the page behaves somewhat strangely. First it shows you the Wiki-page that deals with digraphs in general for a brief moment, and it kind of JUMPs! into this picture

- and it's the middle line I find looks like calligraphy
EDIT: turned 'JUMP!' into 'JUMPs!'

Halloween wordplay installment
- just landed in my mailbox

- one more reason to have Norwitchen as my favorite airline

Forgot one important thing: if the stem already ends in -t, you don't have to apply "<stem> + t" (2nd and 3rd person singular).
Example: weten = to know: ik/jij/hij weet, wij/jullie/zij weten

Might as well add the present tense of the irregular verbs. :-)

Already did 'zijn' en 'hebben'. First we jump into kunnen, zullen, mogen, komen.
kunnen = can: ik/jij/hij kan, wij/jullie/zij kunnen (also: jij kunt)
zullen = will: ik/jij/hij wil, wij/jullie/zij willen (also: jij wilt)
mogen = to may, to be allowed: ik/jij/hij mag, wij/jullie/zij mogen
komen = to come: ik kom, jij/hij komt, wij/jullie/zij komen

Now, let's deal with zien, doen, gaan, staan, slaan.
zien = to see: ik zie, jij/hij ziet, wij/jullie/zij zien
doen = to do: ik doe, jij/hij doet, wij/jullie/zij doen
gaan = to go: ik ga, jij/hij gaat, wij/jullie/zij gaan
staan = to stand: ik sta, jij/hij staat, wij/jullie/zij staan
slaan = to hit/beat: ik sla, jij/hij slaat, wij/jullie/zij slaan

Ik doe wat ik doe - Singer is Astrid Nijgh, three weeks at number 6 in the Top 40 in 1973

Hello " Little Mermaid "
Even though i cannot intervene in all these complexities u extend on that thread about languages -i dont know even a word of german or danish-may i ask you to correct the omission of X in that last sentence in french.

"-who can say no to an invitation to go to Base Camping in France?"
Je ne PEUX pas "

VerbePouvoir3third group in french grammar

Respectfully.

It's interesting to note how Danish verbs are treated, little maid of the sea:
to write = ’at skrive’ + the present ’r’ = jeg skriver (I write)
to eat = ’at spise’ + the present ’r’ = du skriver (you write)
to smile = at smile + the present ’r’ = han smiler (he smiles)
to dance = at danse + the present ’r’ = vi danser (we dance)
to drink = at drikke + the present ’r’ = I drikker (you (the plural) drink)
to sing = at synge + the present ’r’ = de synger (they sing)

If we should do that to Dutch verbs, and let's pretend that the stem of verbs would be ending in -e instead of -en, then we get:
ik/jij/hij/wij/jullie/zij schrijver (write), lacher (smile), danser (dance), drinker, zinger

Of course now it's somewhat ridiculous. I know. But … there is even some sense of recognition: it looks as if we're meeting primitive people from some recently discovered tribe and they're trying to speak Dutch without verbs. Pronoun + noun.
I (or more primitive: me) writer, you smiler, he dancer, she drinker
(loosely meaning: I am a writer, you are a smiler, he is a dancer, etc.)

It reminds me of a children's TV-series from the sixties called Pipo the Clown with an actor playing the role of an (American) Indian (you know, a person with a wigwam) called Klukkluk and he only used one conjugation of verbs: the infinitive: "Mij zijn van de luie, jij gelijk hebben, hij zijn van de dikke." (where you would recognize the Dutch infinitives 'hebben' and 'zijn' with singular pronouns 'jij' and 'hij'). The Indian also used the word "mij" (= me) instead of the correct "ik" (1st person singular). In this way Dutch children could hear that this Indian wasn't properly speaking Dutch.
Translation of the bad Dutch sentence above into English would go something like this:
"Me are the lazy one type, you right are, he are the fat one type."

Why did I mention this example? Because it resembles Danish conjugations!
If all Dutch people would have gone walking along the path of this Dutch Indian, we would all be speaking Klukklukkish Indian Dutch.

Of course it wouldn't have to be the Danish 'r' per se that would be ending verbs. Another possibility could be the Dutch 't' that's common in the 2nd and 3rd person singular.

Well, that was a short trip, a very short lingual experiment.

Maybe ask Sint Nicolaas first (5 December). I think I would choose Indian Dutch, so that we could say: "That's good Dutch! Mr Klukkluk was right all the time!"

Agreed, it should always be wintertime. So, 'ikke' means against? It looks like it has to sound like 'agai' without the -nst. Google Translate says 'no means no'.
So, everybody is sitting there towards 2 o'clock, ready to start the meeting, and suddenly it's 3 o'clock and the meeting is over. "Yes, you were sitting there, you had your chances, now it's too late ."