Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 14623
Posts: 14623   Pages: 1463   [ Previous Page | 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2778542 times and has 14622 replies Next Thread
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

The challenge is running. 16 hours of MCM units. Threadripper 1950X vs Ryzen 9 3900X.

At the halfway mark (8 hours) my Ryzen 9 3900X is 5 minutes away from having processed 72 units, with about 15 further units at averaging about 5% done (so basically, 72 units completed, near enough).

The CPU is running all 12 cores at 3975MHz, the temperature is 80C, the CPU package power is 145W and the system power at the wall is 197W.
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by dcrobinson at Feb 20, 2020 9:24:34 AM]
[Feb 20, 2020 8:06:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
unsmurf
Cruncher
Joined: Mar 11, 2017
Post Count: 27
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

Im very interested in your outcome as im looking at a Ryzen 9 for my new build.
i have a couple of questions if you dont mind.
are you running 12 or 24 tasks at a time?
what cooler are you running?
are you using tthrottle to control the temps or just running flat out and monitoring it?
----------------------------------------
[Feb 20, 2020 8:48:18 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

Im very interested in your outcome as im looking at a Ryzen 9 for my new build.
i have a couple of questions if you dont mind.
are you running 12 or 24 tasks at a time?
what cooler are you running?
are you using tthrottle to control the temps or just running flat out and monitoring it?

24 threads. Much more energy efficient. My system uses 40-50W idling, 200W flat out with 24 threads, and about 175W with 12 threads. In general, I'm only going to be crunching when my electricity drops below 4p/unit (see earlier posts).
I sold the bundled cooler (which isn't bad) on eBay and have a Scythe Mugen 5 rev.B air cooler. I'm a big fan of Scythe air coolers, which are virtually silent even when flat out, and don't leak smile. I have a Fractal Design Define C micro-ATX case, and just use the two supplied case fans. The graphics card is a GT1030 and is fanless. The case fans are audible when flat out, but only as a quiet hum. If I turn off one of them (the front fan) it's almost silent but the CPU temp goes up a couple of degrees. The CPU itself is good for 95C I believe, so plenty of headroom still, hopefully enough to cope with a hot summer.
Having done some Googling, temperatures of 80-85C are typical for this CPU.
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
----------------------------------------
[Edit 3 times, last edit by dcrobinson at Feb 21, 2020 3:32:17 PM]
[Feb 20, 2020 9:22:10 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
unsmurf
Cruncher
Joined: Mar 11, 2017
Post Count: 27
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

Thanks, thats some good info there.
for me i dont need to worry about electric cost as such as thats all included in my rent, i just try not to waste it for no reason. the pc is however on 24/7 for various reasons thou.
your system is much more energy efficient than mine currently (i7-3770k, gtx780, 7x hdd, 1x ssd) which on idle will use 250W at the wall and 370 on full load which is 95% of the time so im hoping my new build will bring a saving there or atleast do a lot more work for the same cost.
Again fan noise isnt a problem as im so used to my 4 case fans anyway but they are needed as the room does get hot in the summer so i have to be careful then otherwise it starts to throttle itself but makes for a great little heater in the winter.
From my reaserch most people are saying 70-80 is normal but even upto 90 is acceptable.

I look forward to the final results of your test
----------------------------------------
[Feb 20, 2020 7:16:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

The results are in (from one fairly unscientific run)

We ran for 16 hours, processing solely MCM work units. Any uncompleted units were added up pro-rata at the end of the time period. We used the CPU package power consumption to elimate other factors such as storage and memory.

Ryzen 9 3900X (12 cores, 24 threads):
144.25 units
CPU package power consumption: 146W
Energy cost per unit: 16.2 Wh

Threadripper 1950X (16 cores, 32 threads):
159.4 units
CPU package power consumption: 218W
Energy cost per unit: 21.9 Wh

So it was a close-run thing between the 1st generation 32-thread processor and the 3rd generation 24-thread processor. Unfortunately, this could prove to be an expensive exercise, because DMNI now wants to upgrade his Threadripper!!!
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by dcrobinson at Feb 21, 2020 8:25:40 AM]
[Feb 20, 2020 8:13:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Darkmatter.NI
Veteran Cruncher
Northern Ireland
Joined: Jun 6, 2014
Post Count: 783
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

I thought that DC was going to out produce me. It was very close indeed which shows how much improvement has happened in the past few years. If DC had the 16 core version, I'd have to over-clock just to keep it close.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 21, 2020 6:07:57 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

If I had a 3950X I'd have crunched another 48 units or thereabouts, so you'd have to up your game by 20% DMNI, which is one heck of an overclock.
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
[Feb 22, 2020 7:34:59 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
mac1
Senior Cruncher
United Kingdom
Joined: Mar 30, 2014
Post Count: 263
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

Very interesting test results, thanks for sharing those.
Thought I'd try and lift some numbers from my stats for comparison.
Results from 19th Feb, I guess when you did your test?
24hours period and Watts measured at the socket.
Results   Watts   Watts per day   Watts per unit        PC
127 162 3888 30.61 16core Xeon v4 1cpu
403 374 8976 22.27 48core Xeon (8160) 2cpu
151 200 4800 31.78 24core Xeon V4 2cpu

The v4's are well off the pace, nearly twice as power hungry as the 3900X. The 16core is being sunset today as it happens (going to dad). I think I'll gut the other one and refresh it later in the year. AMD is looking a strong contender right now.
----------------------------------------
cheers,
Andy
Suffolk - UK
[Feb 22, 2020 2:24:53 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Darkmatter.NI
Veteran Cruncher
Northern Ireland
Joined: Jun 6, 2014
Post Count: 783
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

If I had a 3950X I'd have crunched another 48 units or thereabouts, so you'd have to up your game by 20% DMNI, which is one heck of an overclock.


That sounds like a challenge, I like a good chal....

We've been here before!

Do you want to do another run? This time using PBO?
I would also like to do a run with hyper-threading disabled.

For a 20% overclock would need much superior cooling, and a power station to run it.
What I find odd, is that the CPU should not have voltage above 1.50, yet at stock, while idle, the voltage goes that high intermittently. Under load the voltage is stable at 1.10.
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Darkmatter.NI at Feb 23, 2020 12:48:40 AM]
[Feb 22, 2020 3:07:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dcrobinson
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Mar 10, 2009
Post Count: 1176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Threadripper vs Ryzen 9

Very interesting test results, thanks for sharing those.
Thought I'd try and lift some numbers from my stats for comparison.
Results from 19th Feb, I guess when you did your test?
24hours period and Watts measured at the socket.
Results   Watts   Watts per day   Watts per unit        PC
127 162 3888 30.61 16core Xeon v4 1cpu
403 374 8976 22.27 48core Xeon (8160) 2cpu
151 200 4800 31.78 24core Xeon V4 2cpu

The v4's are well off the pace, nearly twice as power hungry as the 3900X. The 16core is being sunset today as it happens (going to dad). I think I'll gut the other one and refresh it later in the year. AMD is looking a strong contender right now.

That's very interesting Andy (Mac1). The Xeon 8160 is pretty close.
If you take "Watts at the wall" as the unit of measurement for mine 3900X it works out at about 21.7 Wh/unit. My storage and RAM are pretty energy efficient, but I do have an 8 or 9W hit from the graphics card (4 to 5% of my total energy consumption).
----------------------------------------
Dave Robinson, Malvern, UK
[Feb 24, 2020 9:28:29 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 14623   Pages: 1463   [ Previous Page | 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread