Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 206
Posts: 206   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 21160 times and has 205 replies Next Thread
bicotz
Advanced Cruncher
Canada
Joined: Apr 25, 2010
Post Count: 67
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

My AMD Athlon XP 3000+ sadly has the "invalid" blues... All the beta results came out first as inconclusive, then turned out invalid once pitted againt it's wingmen...

All my other processors are trouble free.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 1, 2012 5:48:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Oddly enough my Athlon XP actually validated on at least one task.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
[Feb 1, 2012 6:03:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Just noticed that a couple from batch AAA74693_0000001 have gone Inconclusive, perhaps because of big difference in run times between self (1.29 and 1.27 hours) and wingman (9.35 and 18.43 hours). We'll see what wingman 2 gives.

-------------------------------------------
Project Name: Beta Test
Created: 01/31/2012 14:48:22
Name: BETA_SN2S_AAA74693_0000001_4191
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 3

BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 4191_ 2-- - In Progress 01/02/12 11:50:39 03/02/12 02:14:39 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 4191_ 0-- 612 Inconclusive 31/01/12 15:29:39 01/02/12 11:48:23 18.43 36.2 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 4191_ 1-- 612 Inconclusive 31/01/12 15:29:38 31/01/12 16:48:32 1.27 24.3 / 0.0


The 18.43 hour one above is on an old Celeron 400 which had Invalid work units on GFAM and DSFL so likely will be for this.
It was working on HCC where it validates OK.
Mine and wingman 2 went Valid, Paul's went Invalid sad , somewhat as expected. At least you get the points.
---------------------------------

BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 4191_ 2-- 612 Valid 01/02/12 11:50:39 01/02/12 17:38:12 1.29 42.6 / 33.4
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 4191_ 0-- 612 Invalid 31/01/12 15:29:39 01/02/12 11:48:23 18.43 36.2 / 33.4
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 4191_ 1-- 612 Valid 31/01/12 15:29:38 31/01/12 16:48:32 1.27 24.3 / 33.4
[Feb 1, 2012 6:23:02 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

I have to agree with Kremmen. All the AAB WUs I've checked use even less memory than the shorter-running AAA ones -- less than half as much.
[Feb 1, 2012 7:11:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 200
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Timing seems to be very erratic - the quickest so far 0.08, with others running for about 1.25 and then through to a few hours - nothing in the 10's of hours league to date..... Haven't seen an error or inconclusive yet either, they appear to be well behaved.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 1, 2012 7:47:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 761
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Oddly enough my Athlon XP actually validated on at least one task.


So has my old proswssor!
2 more pending and 1 running.

Paul.

Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Edition, Service Pack 4, (05.00.2195.00)
AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) proswssor [x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0]

Project Name: Beta Test
Created: 01/31/2012 14:52:21
Name: BETA_SN2S_AAA74693_0000001_1595
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 3

Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 1595_ 3-- 612 Valid 01/02/12 03:29:29 01/02/12 06:25:31 2.88 28.5 / 27.1 <--- mine
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 1595_ 2-- - Detached 31/01/12 23:16:29 01/02/12 03:22:50 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 1595_ 1-- 612 Invalid 31/01/12 20:59:01 31/01/12 22:38:15 1.19 25.2 / 25.2
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 1595_ 0-- 612 Valid 31/01/12 20:58:54 31/01/12 23:13:05 2.20 25.8 / 27.1
----------------------------------------
Paul.
[Feb 1, 2012 7:50:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
ThreadRipper
Veteran Cruncher
Sweden
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 1317
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

I have about 10 finished Beta WUs and a few mote in the queue. So far all the computed Beta WUs have validated with no errors.
----------------------------------------

Join The International Team: https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=CK9RP1BKX1

AMD TR2990WX @ PBO, 64GB Quad 3200MHz 14-17-17-17-1T, RX6900XT @ Stock
AMD 3800X @ PBO
AMD 2700X @ 4GHz
[Feb 1, 2012 8:00:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Oddly enough my Athlon XP actually validated on at least one task.


So has my old proswssor!
2 more pending and 1 running.

Paul.

Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Edition, Service Pack 4, (05.00.2195.00)
AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) proswssor [x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0]

Project Name: Beta Test
Created: 01/31/2012 14:52:21
Name: BETA_SN2S_AAA74693_0000001_1595
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 3

Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 1595_ 3-- 612 Valid 01/02/12 03:29:29 01/02/12 06:25:31 2.88 28.5 / 27.1 <--- mine
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 1595_ 2-- - Detached 31/01/12 23:16:29 01/02/12 03:22:50 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 1595_ 1-- 612 Invalid 31/01/12 20:59:01 31/01/12 22:38:15 1.19 25.2 / 25.2
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000001_ 1595_ 0-- 612 Valid 31/01/12 20:58:54 31/01/12 23:13:05 2.20 25.8 / 27.1<---mine

Well, that explains it because mine is the other valid one

Windows XP SP3
1/31/2012 3:04:20 AM Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(TM) XP [Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0]
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by KWSN - A Shrubbery at Feb 1, 2012 8:41:10 PM]
[Feb 1, 2012 8:16:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

My AMD Athlon XP 3000+ sadly has the "invalid" blues... All the beta results came out first as inconclusive, then turned out invalid once pitted againt it's wingmen...

All my other processors are trouble free.



Have the same CPU, and same problem, also hitting DSFL and GFAM (aka anything VINA based) this box ran dsfl just fine for the past 2 weeks, now everything vina is inconclusive/invalad
[Feb 1, 2012 8:25:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
astrolabe.
Senior Cruncher
Joined: May 9, 2011
Post Count: 496
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

52 Beta WU so far. My same 2 boxes that cannot chew on DFSL/GFAM are the only invalids/ sad
[Feb 1, 2012 8:32:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 206   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread