Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 206
Posts: 206   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 21155 times and has 205 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
biggrin Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012


Also, we know this beta started late for our European crunchers, which is why I will trigger more work units to go out late tonight and early tomorrow. Right now we have about 10,000 results out in the wild. I will release that many if not more in the next 12-24 hours.


Thanks biggrin
A Fair move
These are the first Betas I received in 4 months with 18 cores running 24/7
[Feb 1, 2012 12:24:04 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
joeperry39@gmail.com
Advanced Cruncher
USA
Joined: Nov 22, 2006
Post Count: 140
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

I've received 4 WUs so far. First one finished in 1.99hrs; the remaining units are "estimated" at ~3 to 4.5 hrs.

My guess on the longer times may have to do with the fact that I have been using my quad-core for several other non-WCG projects today and that seems to have a major effect on estimated times.

BTW, the box that is receiving these beta units runs 24/7 so the estimated times may change a bit as more time elapses.

good luck flag Only 46 days until March 17th!
----------------------------------------


"Everything in moderation, including moderation" -- Mark Twain
[Feb 1, 2012 12:46:50 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Post Count: 1343
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

So far I have had a total of 50.

13 IP
8 PV
29 V

Averaging a little over 6 hours on the netbook, but the rest are what everyone else is experiencing.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 1, 2012 2:54:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

*Holds out bowl*

"Please sir, may I have some more?"

I only need around another 60 days worth to turn ruby. biggrin


*Holds out extra large bowl* praying

Hard to make headway when all but 1 so far have run less than an hour. d oh biggrin

Up to 18 pages of results. For all of you asking how, you need a lot of cores and a lot of work.


Define a lot of cores? I have 33 cores between 2 boxes and received only 8. Granted my 22 core PC is online 24/7, the other gets manually connected once per day so can see this one not getting any. Am guessing you keep a low cache and connected 24/7. That's how my main rig that's connected 24/7 got the 8.

I did get one wu that has a 24 HR deadline. With the low completion time, can see how folks missed out on this batch.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Feb 1, 2012 2:56:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

range anwhere from 2.13 to .17 hours

edit to add memory-
For the ones I saw, memory was pretty much like this- a few went up to 62 mb


Some of these are amazingly short. .47-1.95 hours on a P3/1.4. (Wingman did the first one in .19.)

Similar to pramo, largest memory use I've seen under linux is 55MB. (70MB virtual) These would run fine on a machine with <256MB RAM.
[Feb 1, 2012 3:18:06 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 748
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

I just read about the new Betas, and got a bunch this evening.

I guess the goal of this project is to builda betta' beta. dancing

(Sorry)

lp
[Feb 1, 2012 3:23:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
BSD
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Apr 27, 2011
Post Count: 224
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Skip to my Lou dancing Linux got two, Windows one, none for lonely Mac. The chorus is coming around again ... whistling
[Feb 1, 2012 3:33:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Got a few on different systems. All 50 to 60MB tasks so far. Unfortunately they don't take very long, even on slow CPU's, so looks like I'll be stuck with red for a while yet.

BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000000_ 0626_ 1-- slow-rig Valid 31/01/12 02:20:16 31/01/12 12:49:49 0.29 4.0 / 4.2
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000000_ 1582_ 1-- slow-rig2 Pending Validation 31/01/12 03:04:49 31/01/12 23:50:18 0.90 11.6 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000000_ 0482_ 0-- slow-rig3 Pending Validation 31/01/12 00:49:08 31/01/12 07:39:44 0.64 9.5 / 0.0

GL
[Feb 1, 2012 4:23:52 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Greetings all,

Estimated times may be off a bit on the grouping I just sent out. These work units will run longer than the previous batches. about 3-6 times as long. We are hoping they run in the ball park of 3 hours based on the estimates created from the tiny guys that have been sent out in the past few days. There are over 12,000 results that need to be sent out. Previous work units had the identifier AAA74693, these new ones will be different....

AAB20794 and AAB20796

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Feb 1, 2012 5:47:48 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

BETA_ SN2S_ AAA74693_ 0000000_ 0081_ 1-- user1-Satellite
-L305 In Progress 1/30/12 23:28:16 2/3/12 23:28:16 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

that is shown on my grid under the results status,

on my laptop is is only showing :
DSFL_00000110_0000017_0653_0 using dsfl version 624

and nothing else in query

does anyone know whats that all about?

No, unless there's somewhere a forgotten host crunching under your account with the user1-Satellite device name.

--//--


user1-satelite is my laptop that I use no other device under the same name

Well, there's also that button on the left to show more than just the running tasks.;>)

--//--



are you referring to "show all task" command? I already have it selected it only has the option to "show active task"


So many quotes...

Anyways, hunterkasy, if you don't mind can you look at your messages tab and see if the work unit was listed in there? If you want to you can "Copy All Messages" and save it to a text file. Then email that text file to support@worldcommunitygrid.org with a subject line ATTN: uplinger. This will only be informational if you have not rebooted your machine since you noticed the issue. Messages get cleared from the agent when it starts up after pc's boot up.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Feb 1, 2012 5:50:52 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 206   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread