| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 206
|
|
| Author |
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Greetings,
Please read about the beta test here... https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,32508 Please post all issues/questions within this thread. Thank you, -Uplinger Also, we know this beta started late for our European crunchers, which is why I will trigger more work units to go out late tonight and early tomorrow. Right now we have about 10,000 results out in the wild. I will release that many if not more in the next 12-24 hours. Again, thank you for your support! |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Wee little fellows they are.
---------------------------------------- First one finished in 11 minutes and the next in 22 minutes. I got 13 so far and pushed them to the top to crunch. See no problems. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
How to say, causes wet eyes on some.
Or the percentages are off, or the times are variable... first 24 minutes, second 26 minutes, third 29 minutes, at 32%, and of course Norton acted up and needed another ''application exception'', for frequent alerting of hi CPU use... still not accepting wildcards against the project directory. --//-- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
To say times are variable would appear to me to be a major understatement. On my ancient P4 I have two work units which, after 40 minutes elapsed, are at 10.00% and 91.25%.
The one at 10% changed at EXACTLY 40 minutes, so the units may have some time-trips in them. Keith asked to check on memory usage. Everything I've seen looks very normal, even on these two outliers. |
||
|
|
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Post Count: 1027 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I have 8 running, spread across 3 machines. No problems so far.
----------------------------------------The CPU temp is a little higher than usual, which also happens on all my machines when GFAM or DSFL are running.  |
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
First one finished in six minutes, second looks to be closer to 24. No detectable problems as of yet, I'll keep trying to break them.
---------------------------------------- Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
From 12 minutes to 1:46 is the range on first 8 on 1 device and next 8 are heading for 15 minutes to 2 hours. The wide variance is surely needing the same handling as with DSFL/GFAM to estimate the ligands and get a semblance of predictable times.
The % progress seem to skip in fixed fractions of 1,250 percent for these task builds, with these per stderr.txt holding 8 jobs. They're adhering to the checkpoint settings of the client. Memory and workset so far around 50Mb max. --//-- |
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
Had my first error, an exit 193.
----------------------------------------The message log only said "D5-PIIX6 8981 World Community Grid 1/30/2012 6:12:03 PM Output file BETA_SN2S_AAA74693_0000000_2015_1_0 for task BETA_SN2S_AAA74693_0000000_2015_1 absent " Work unit gave me: <core_client_version>6.10.59</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) </message> <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. [18:07:25] Number of tasks = 8 [18:07:25] Starting task 0,CPU time is 0.000000. [18:07:25] ./ZINC02096491.pdbqt size = 35 8 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta14.target_AAA74693.pdbqt size = 469 0 SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Stack trace (7 frames): [0x806e9d0] [0x80ebfcc] [0xf773d400] [0x807b3f1] [0x804d78c] [0x80ee09e] [0x8048131] Exiting... </stderr_txt> ]]> This machine has already successfully completed four Betas thus far. No validations yet. Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Had one short one on linux, now got a couple on mac and windows OS. No problems so far.
----------------------------------------edited to update status [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 31, 2012 5:54:20 AM] |
||
|
|
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Post Count: 1343 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have 6 machines and 2 virtual machines crunching them...too bad my wife wont allow me to turn on the garage farm. She seems to think we need to remodel a house rather then pay for more electricity. I guess I can have more fun filling a 6 bedroom house with computers rather then the current 2 bedroom one...LOL
----------------------------------------    |
||
|
|
|