Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 206
Posts: 206   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 21146 times and has 205 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Only got two this round and I haven't been able to break them yet. They are pretty long running though, the shortest one is headed for over 10 hours.

Noticed that at well, they are much longer than the last batch, looking like 12 hours+ instead of 2.
[Feb 21, 2012 4:07:40 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

We are going to send out another small wave to make sure some of our backend server scripts are ready.

This is not just a server script test. These are huge. Only my slow machines caught any and the quickest of them has done 0.061 in 18053 secs, so it's looking at completion in around 82 hours.
[Feb 21, 2012 6:21:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Dataman
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 4865
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

These are some big ones but that will probably be adjusted before production. The shortest one that has cleared so far was just over 7 hours on I7 980 and some are tracking from 10-12 on I7 920. I have had no problems on the wu's or the graphics. I was just lucky to grab what I did but it should add about 20 days to my quest toward the elusive blue beta ... only have about 250 days to go ... laughing

cowboy
----------------------------------------


----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Dataman at Feb 21, 2012 6:57:25 AM]
[Feb 21, 2012 6:56:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

No complaints, but if the testing is to establish the robustness of the sizing scripts, there's a bit more work on hand. The first Beta finished with 15 hours on an I7 [Q6600 took 9-10 hours for the 4], which threw the usual DCF banana curve ball. Since the queue had a dozen CEP2 & DSFL repair jobs queued or in progress [yes this is a reliable host returning all work within 48 hours], these suffered a Greek GNP budget comedy of inflation too [our national budget is a comedy too btw ;>]... total panic in the queue and no task agreeing who's 'to go' first.. all listed bloody red in the BOINCTasks view.

BETA_ SN2S_ A37114_ 0000000_ 0357_ 1-- 1854592 Valid 21-2-2012 13:03:00 21-2-2012 11:50:34 15,00 360,2 312,4 15,88 20,83 BETA Windows 7 - 64 I7 20-2-2012 19:57:57

--//--
[Feb 21, 2012 12:15:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

For others: I haven't been able to recreate this locally, has anyone else had this problem?
Boo hoo, maybe just me then.
There's a similar problem with GFAM & DSFL, in that the graphics does run successfully until I hit the Close button, at which point the same error dialogue appears. Still no prob with CEP2 graphics. though.
Email sent to Seippel earlier.
[Feb 21, 2012 12:54:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

With the version 6 API as used by WCG on all sciences, crashing graphics no longer is supposed to borg the science task, so it would be a ''don't view'' penalty if the cause can't be found or fixed. Still, what BOINC version, how installed [service/PAE or only running when user logs in] and how up to date are video drivers (what version) are on this system?

--//--
[Feb 21, 2012 1:12:02 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Indeed, I was pleased that the science tasks continued without a visible problem, with just the graphics process crashing. All 4 Betas from the i5 are still in PV, so I won't know for sure until they go through validation.
I have BOINC 6.10.58 installed as a service. The GPU is a BFG GTS250 OC Edition, driver version 285.62 (8.17.12.8562) dated 15.10.2011. Latest at NVIDIA is GeForce 295.73 WHQL, Release Date: 21.2.2012 (!). I'll give that a go when I've heard back from Seippel (in case any tests on the failing system are asked for). This is on Win7 64-bit SP1.
I never did find a stderrgfx.txt, even running GFAM, DSFL or CEP2 graphics. Does it just appear in the slots subdirectory? In case it's relevant, I have my data directory at D:\ProgramData\BOINC.
[Feb 21, 2012 2:12:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Got one loitering on slot 9 from 1 month ago (dont ask me why it's still there ... still worked on file house keeping by an alpha testing client)

18:09:25 (10112): Starting graphics application.
qcn_util::getBOINCInitData requested at 1326820165.609661
18:10:16 (10112): Close event (WM_CLOSE) detected, shutting down.
18:10:16 (10112): Shutting down graphics application.
Cleaning up graphics objects...
Signal 11 received, exiting...
Cleaning up graphics objects...


Unhandled Exception Detected...

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x774D44EC write attempt to address 0x00389B1C

Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...



********************


BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger Version 6.13.4


Dump Timestamp : 01/17/12 18:10:16
Install Directory : C:\Program Files (x86)\BOINC\
Data Directory : G:\BOINC
Project Symstore :
LoadLibraryA( C:\Program Files (x86)\BOINC\\dbghelp.dll ): GetLastError = 126
Loaded Library : dbghelp.dll
LoadLibraryA( C:\Program Files (x86)\BOINC\\symsrv.dll ): GetLastError = 126
LoadLibraryA( symsrv.dll ): GetLastError = 126
LoadLibraryA( C:\Program Files (x86)\BOINC\\srcsrv.dll ): GetLastError = 126
LoadLibraryA( srcsrv.dll ): GetLastError = 126
LoadLibraryA( C:\Program Files (x86)\BOINC\\version.dll ): GetLastError = 126
Loaded Library : version.dll
[Feb 21, 2012 2:19:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
ThreadRipper
Veteran Cruncher
Sweden
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 1317
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

I got one of these new Betas: BETA_SN2S_A37114_0000001_0305 and it ran for 8.45 hours, pending validation. But seems to be ok (did not error out or anything directly).
----------------------------------------

Join The International Team: https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=CK9RP1BKX1

AMD TR2990WX @ PBO, 64GB Quad 3200MHz 14-17-17-17-1T, RX6900XT @ Stock
AMD 3800X @ PBO
AMD 2700X @ 4GHz
[Feb 21, 2012 8:30:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
pramo
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Post Count: 703
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

FWIW-
I left the graphics open on the top one for at least half an hour with no crash, swapped back and forth on the bottom two every five minutes for a half hour or so, no problem.
BETA_ SN2S_ A37114_ 0000002_ 0136_ 0-- ASHMBX3 Valid 2/20/12 20:30:25 2/21/12 11:11:04 14.13 271.5 / 270.5
BETA_ SN2S_ A37114_ 0000002_ 0063_ 1-- MGMBX4 Valid 2/20/12 20:25:39 2/21/12 13:00:42 16.34 314.1 / 289.0
BETA_ SN2S_ A37114_ 0000002_ 0209_ 1-- MGMBX4 Valid 2/20/12 20:24:46 2/21/12 12:13:11 15.53 298.3 / 267.1

had 7 total on these boxes- 6 are valid, 1 pv, all ran in the 14-16 hour range
Eadh 2 intel xeon X5650's @2.67GHz, each 24 tasks running, 0ther tasks wece gfam and dsfl.
they don't seem to have any vina problems wink
----------------------------------------

[Feb 22, 2012 12:07:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 206   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread