Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 206
Posts: 206   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 21420 times and has 205 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

I got one for my Linux P4/3Gz HT, it appeared as a 12 hour task. It's now waiting for validation, with a little over 8 hours of cpu time.
[Feb 10, 2012 3:06:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Since this beta run was focused on run times, I'll comment there. Of my 58 tasks, they averaged around 5 hours. Range of 1.66 to 21.25 hours and it wasn't just the speed of the system that caused the variability, it was more the complexity of the units.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
[Feb 10, 2012 5:44:05 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Picked up an inconclusive resend on my socket A machine. Not only will this be as exciting as watching a slug/turtle race, (looks to be around 25 hours predicted run time) the results should be interesting...
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by KWSN - A Shrubbery at Feb 10, 2012 11:42:14 PM]
[Feb 10, 2012 11:41:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Still got:

BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0196_ 2-- - In Progress 2/13/12 10:07:40 2/15/12 00:31:40 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0196_ 1-- 612 Pending Validation 2/9/12 10:07:38 2/9/12 17:48:56 7.25 174.4 / 0.0 < moi
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0196_ 0-- - No Reply 2/9/12 10:07:36 2/13/12 10:07:36 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

Participating in Beta and letting a No Reply happen?

Chutspah

--//--
[Feb 13, 2012 11:42:12 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Deluxe_Cabinets_And_Granite
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Oct 27, 2008
Post Count: 939
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Got a resend with a 2 day time limit and 3 1/2 hours expected completion. Going to push it to the top of the heap.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 13, 2012 11:43:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
pramo
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Post Count: 703
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

picked up these

BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0066_ 2--
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB22885_ 0000001_ 0053_ 2--

still have two pv.
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0119_ 2-- - In Progress 2/13/12 10:43:14 2/15/12 01:07:14 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0119_ 1-- - No Reply 2/9/12 10:43:10 2/13/12 10:43:10 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0119_ 0-- 612 Pending Validation 2/9/12 10:43:07 2/9/12 19:06:31 8.32 161.5 / 0.0

BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0629_ 2-- - In Progress 2/13/12 09:46:12 2/15/12 00:10:12 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0629_ 1-- - No Reply 2/9/12 09:46:08 2/13/12 09:46:08 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0629_ 0-- 612 Pending Validation 2/9/12 09:46:04 2/9/12 19:53:45 8.27 160.6 / 0.0

While it's nice to get these, I agree with Sek- if you're going to do beta, do them straight face
----------------------------------------

[Feb 13, 2012 12:42:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

I also got a resend from a No Reply thinking
[Feb 13, 2012 3:05:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
petnek
Advanced Cruncher
Czech Republic
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Post Count: 89
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

It's really good to want compute beta and then ... nothing. They are breaking WCGs and projects progress... sad

So, give me some WUs for help please biggrin
----------------------------------------

[Feb 13, 2012 3:19:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
pramo
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Post Count: 703
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

I figure no server abort because I started before one of the original copies came back, wonder what kind of credit will come my way for thatwink

BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0066_ 2-- 612 Pending Validation 2/13/12 09:41:52 2/13/12 17:46:38 7.80 148.0 / 0.0 <me
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0066_ 1-- 612 Valid 2/9/12 09:40:33 2/11/12 17:23:39 6.59 97.2 / 102.5
BETA_ SN2S_ AAB68717_ 0000001_ 0066_ 0-- 612 Valid 2/9/12 9:40:32 2/13/12 10:55:49 7.16 107.7 / 102.5
----------------------------------------

[Feb 13, 2012 6:06:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 1585
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta test Started Jan 30, 2012

Pramo, you'll get 102.5 points for that one.

I still have two in pending myself, I'm sure the resends have gone out by now.

As for the inconclusive repair I got on my Socket A, it validated. Guess lightning really can strike twice. That's the second valid result out of nearly 100 since the vina app started.
----------------------------------------

Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by KWSN - A Shrubbery at Feb 14, 2012 2:12:54 AM]
[Feb 14, 2012 2:11:57 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 206   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread