Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 135
Posts: 135   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 13510 times and has 134 replies Next Thread
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

Speaking of yourself as 'we'? The difference of the 2 claims exceeded a certain difference. This is when the 'nearest to historical award per second' comparison kicks in. If you tell us your client is 32 bit, 'we' can speculate more accurately on what the slower client is.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Feb 8, 2010 10:01:50 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

If anyone with one of these percentage issue work units can capture information for me that would be wonderful. The information is in the BOINC Data directory, under slots and some number. There should be a file in one of the directories called result.out. If you want, you can copy and paste that entire directory to your desktop, then zip the directory and send it to support@worldcommunitygrid.org

Please remember, to COPY and PASTE, this will allow you to zip up the directory without needing to shut down BOINC. If you're in windows, to zip the directory, right click and then send to -> compressed folder.

Thanks,
-Uplinger

Are you going to send a server abort on these units that start over and over?
Mine is at 4 days 16+ hours.
[Feb 8, 2010 11:12:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jasm580
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Post Count: 157
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

Speaking of yourself as 'we'? The difference of the 2 claims exceeded a certain difference. This is when the 'nearest to historical award per second' comparison kicks in. If you tell us your client is 32 bit, 'we' can speculate more accurately on what the slower client is.

Mine was the one claiming 664.7 The 3rd one has validated now
BETA_ erlc_ a195_ ps0000_ 2-- 616 Valid 2/3/10 23:38:08 2/8/10 21:32:55 90.16 775.3 / 1,043.5
BETA_ erlc_ a195_ ps0000_ 0-- 616 Valid 2/3/10 23:38:05 2/7/10 19:42:56 57.93 1,043.5 / 1,043.5
BETA_ erlc_ a195_ ps0000_ 1-- 616 Valid 2/3/10 23:38:02 2/6/10 11:45:35 45.00 664.7 / 1,043.5

I have a 32 bit system.
----------------------------------------
-Jasm
[Feb 8, 2010 11:28:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher
Canada
Joined: May 21, 2007
Post Count: 391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

I also experience this percentage issue (around 70s% down to 20s%) and I let go (to see if it goes well). And it validated successfully.
BETA_ erlc_ a068_ ps0000_ 1-- Valid 03/02/10 23:15:49 07/02/10 03:25:46 54.64 1,510.9 / 955.3
This machine crunch 24/7 and after I saw this WU, I let it start right away (maybe an hour after receiving it). Judging by its completion date, it runs for 3+days where in actuality its only 2.25+

The other one that I got finished earlier on the other machine:
BETA_ erlc_ a211_ ps0000_ 2-- Valid 03/02/10 23:40:36 05/02/10 14:22:18 35.12 992.1 / 769.6
----------------------------------------

[Feb 8, 2010 11:40:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

This morning there were ZERO beta validations so the question is: Who's still working on them as the second A type done by my crawler and finished on Saturday is still waiting for a wingman to show up, does not matter who, one of two:

BETA_ erlc_ a048_ ps0000_ 2-- - In Progress 3-2-10 23:12:22 10-2-10 23:12:22 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ erlc_ a048_ ps0000_ 1-- 616 Pending Validation 3-2-10 23:12:19 6-2-10 23:27:22 65.16 690.4 / 0.0 < mine
BETA_ erlc_ a048_ ps0000_ 0-- - In Progress 3-2-10 23:12:16 10-2-10 23:12:16 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

So where are you?
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Feb 9, 2010 4:58:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 2977
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

Sek, it's probably someone who's been greedy and have more Type A's than their computer(s) can cope with - after all, there were a fair bit of 'hovering up' of Beta WU's this time around...
----------------------------------------

[Feb 9, 2010 5:07:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

Greeting,

I am about to take a look at those log files. Andreic and Mathilde, thank you for those log files. I will let everyone know what I find out.

-Uplinger
[Feb 9, 2010 5:09:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
andreic
Advanced Cruncher
Canada
Joined: Nov 19, 2004
Post Count: 100
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

I am still crunching on BETA_erlc_a189_ps0000_0. It seems to be a bit happier now and is at 51.040% after 98h21m with an ETA of 78h.

The completion time is going down by about 6 minutes for every minute of real time, so later today, maybe tomorrow.
[Feb 9, 2010 5:24:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mathilde2006
Senior Cruncher
Germany
Joined: Sep 30, 2006
Post Count: 269
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

Greeting,

I am about to take a look at those log files. Andreic and Mathilde, thank you for those log files. I will let everyone know what I find out.

-Uplinger



Hello,

nice to have you back.
erlc_ a101_ ps0000_ 0 was uploaded (valid) and the four others are 'in production' at 81- 84%.
I think, that you get all back in time.


@Sekerob: I'm not your wingmen. smile
Don't forget, that there was the C-Beta.
So computers crunched first the work with the 3 days expiration date.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 9, 2010 5:43:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
HutchNYC
Advanced Cruncher
United States
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Post Count: 97
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Repeat Test of Type A for DDDT2

Yesterday I picked up a re-issue of BETA_ erlc_ a046_ ps0000_ 6 on one of my machines.

As bad luck would have it, that pc is a SLOW Pentium D and it started out with an estimated 271+ hours until completion. Return deadline is the 11th at 8:16am.

After several hours of working on it, it slowly progressed with that estimate looking pretty accurate. I suspended all other tasks to let all the cores crunch just this one WU and it has moved along some. It's now at 36.240% complete after nearly 24 hours CPU time crunching. Estimated 133~ hours remaining.

Don't believe it has re-started or had any problems that some of the other type-a's have had. We'll see how it recovers after the big MS patch tuesday restart that will be required in a few hours.

If this WU doesn't return in time, might be something for the techs to consider putting a machine class restriction on for short deadline make-up jobs like this. The machine is a 24/7 cruncher and could make a normal 10 day deadline, but it's really struggling with this shorter one.

Meantime, I'll let it keep going unless the techs advise otherwise.
----------------------------------------
[Feb 9, 2010 5:57:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 135   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread