| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Locked Total posts in this thread: 277
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Now define " Not supported " !
----------------------------------------Crunch3rs files were not illegal or punishable.....Fact you have stated. Now they are.....That IS a policy change. Fact is I think you`ve been contacted and told by now that the new ruling DOES indeed constitute a policy change which you have denied again and again. . [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 11, 2006 11:40:49 PM] |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Good evening people
----------------------------------------Step back from those keyboards just for once and listen to yourselves. What are you actually arguing about? Points. What are points? Are they of any value whatsoever? Is it going to change your life if you have 1 million or just 1? Answer = no Is contributing to the research being carried out on this grid going to change someone elses life? Answer = Hopefully yes How much damage seen and unseen are you doing to how quickly Hopefully yes turns into Definitely yes by this constant barrage of abuse over bloody pointless points and yes that is an expletive because yes I am pig sick of the bickering over something that is supposed to be for the common good. IBM have tried to make it fairer for all concerned but there's always a few who take umbrage at everything and anything being done. Back up this thread it says how often are people to visit this forum, well hopefully in recent weeks very little indeed hopefully they sign up and crunch because they think its the right thing to do and that research keeps on getting done and hopefully a lot more soon. Please remember that the reason for all of this is in the hope of preventing someone the suffering of HIV or Cancer or many other diseases and conditions. If you wish to carry on knocking 7 bells out of each other carry on but I will not have any part of it. I will just go back to focusing on the positive the fact that each day of the working week more than the equivalent of 50,000 PC's ran 24 hours a day Monday to Friday and 604,034 work units of research into HIV and Cancer were returned to the Scientists who can make a difference. I would like to see those figures increasing. I would like to see us together break 150 years in a day soon. I would like to see us complete a Millennium in just 1 week soon but those milestones could be reached all the sooner if every weekend wasn't littered with a rutting stag mentality. It is just ridiculous Now do you really want me to ring the bell for Round 16? Or have we all had enough? Good Night all Dave ![]() ![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by David Autumns at Nov 12, 2006 12:11:54 AM] |
||
|
|
zombie67 [MM]
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 26, 2006 Post Count: 228 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I understand your points here. In fact there was 6 days notice given. Not 7 but not 0 either. Please check the times and dates of the two forum announcements. One last post for clarity. I read those announcements originally, and just now again. The first post said that the change was going into beta testing, with no timeline for implementation. The second post, the only one with an actual implementation date, said it was a successful beta, and already implemented in production. So I say again, 0 day notification. In this particular case, what's done is done. No point in try to back in time. But the reason I keep focusing on this issue, is to try to help the project to learn from this, and not repeat it. When you make change that impacts users, you need to clearly notify users (done), and allow them enough time to comply (not done). ![]() |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Just what action is needed on the part of any cruncher to comply?
----------------------------------------What difference did it make to anyone's crunching on the 6th? That said I understand the point being made (Oh the irony of those words) Perhaps the rush this time was to bring this whole shenanigans to a close as quickly as possible so we could get back to what we do best which is crunch. Dave ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
After reading this entire thread, I'm all in favor of dumping points all together and just going off the results returned for a ranking of how well one is doing. When It comes down to it...the points just don't matter. Unfortunately this wouldn't work, as different projects have different WU completion times - you can crunch around 3 HDC results in the time of 1 FAAH result, so those wishing to crunch FAAH only would be at a severe disadvantage. "Severe disadvantage". ?? The work is getting done, right? OK... I think the point of doing this work has been lost. Like I mentioned above "the points just don't matter". Is it so important to be higher than someone/everyone else. Friendly competition is fine but this points thing has gone completely out of hand and you should re-evaluate why your crunching to begin with. Your right brinktastee that the work is getting done - but that wasn't what I was replying too - I was merely stating that your suggestion of using results as a measure was flawed due to the differences in the projects result completion times - if we are to have a measure it has to be somewhere near fair across the board. Stats are important to some people like it or not - and if it attracts members and means more work gets done because of them - then fine, I'm not complaining. I would also like to agree that the points thing has got out of hand, and that I do not need to 're-evaluate why I am crunching to begin with' as the death of both my parents is more than enough reason for me. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Well done WCG for taking this stand.
And good on ya CA's, you're doing a good job handling this issue. |
||
|
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Addy, Sek, Dave, I totally agree. To the readers of this and other of the WCG forums, I most sincerely apologise for having ever started this thread. If I had had the slightest inkling that it would degrade to a level of behaviour that is beneath even that which I will not tolerate from my own three year old daughter, I never would have started it. I know that I will find myself hesitating when it comes to starting any other threads.
----------------------------------------I have formally requested that the WCG admins lock this thread. I have also inquired as to the technical feasibility of locking specific ids out of the forums altogether. No, I did NOT name any actual ids. I merely asked if it was possible. There are plenty of folks who have watched their loved ones suffering and painfully die from diseases that we hope and pray our efforts here help bring an end to. I WILL NOT ALLOW OR TOLERATE THE RUDE, INCONSIDERATE OR DISRESPECTFUL ACTIONS OF ANY INDIVIDUAL(S) TO TAKE AWAY FROM OR HARM THIS PROJECT. I do not always agree with every point made in these forums. I suspect even fewer agree with every point I made in these forums. These are NOT arguements to be WON or LOST. The behavior displayed in this thread goes beyond dispicable. There is NO EXCUSE WHATSOEVER! I have seen ENOUGH people QUIT this project because of the lower than infantile behavior that has occurred in its forums. I no longer can allow myself to stand by and do nothing. It is my hope that I will not be alone in these efforts. |
||
|
|
nozi
Cruncher Joined: Feb 3, 2006 Post Count: 10 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Yes, Yes, Yes and ... as many "yes" as everybody likes and needs.
I am crunching for the "good idea" of this project - for all projects i participate(d) in - the last ~ 5 - 6 years ( as carl does ... )Nevertheless i see no point in this discussion, whether it is matter of fact or not. Instead of wasting the project developers time e.g. in this pointless discussion it would be productive to develop an own system which allows to measure real flops done on each job in particular without any prob. Further the developers would be far more in "their range of activity" if they code the implementations for all sientific extensions ( SSE 1 - 4 + ... ) into the WCG app instead of "pausing their activities" or utilising them elsewhere. And sorry - but the most important thing, which where mentioned before in many , many posts everywhere here - was : FAIR competition counts. This is the main motivation for me. This only as a: "btw. - note" Please all of you : Do us all a favour and leave this discusion for awhile ( some weeks ? ) "Rome wasn't built in one day" - and won't be completed in the next few hundred thausand of days . It never ends as long as humans are involved. Give the staff at least a chance to make their decisions and do proper development. All what may be of interest during that time will be productive hints for the development. Before that stage is a definition of "FAIR" crucial. And an implementation as seen immediately to be done. So please don't let me be misunderstood. I see the point everyone puts into the discussion. I would prefer a straight work to solve the issues of doing more/better work by enhancing the scientific app. I believe in the prosperity of community projects like W Community G. I agree that points are POINTLESS However points are at least the comparison between me and myself... ( e.g. Before buying a new computer and after ) Friendly competition is the best method to drive me to new ( computing- ) horizons. I 'll leave out the numberless reasons on detail like personal experience , several unexpected burials , personal ill health, etc, etc . What i try to say is : Why the project and all of its participants don't try to work together for the good goal ? Excuse my bad lingo, because english isn't my native tongue and i am very tired just now. |
||
|
|
Movieman
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Sep 9, 2006 Post Count: 1042 Status: Offline |
This seems to be the most appropriate thread to put this in.
----------------------------------------People are talking about cause and effect essentially in this thread. Here's a couple to add to that: A couple weeks ago a comment was made here by a CA. That comment was later apologised for and as far as I'm concerned is history but not all see things as I do. I just found out today that one of the guys on my team saw that comment and his response was "if WCG would retain someone after that kind of slander then I'm out" That guy returned 1,897 results himself in a 60 day timeframe. Not the kind of people I like to see walk away. I point this out not to rehash the subject but to point out that words spoken without adequete forthought can have drastic results. Another point: This thread is talking on the changes in the current credit system. One thing that concerns me is the change from using the middle returned claim to using the median claim as this lowers the awarded points. It isn't by a large amount but from the fast numbers I've seen it looks to be in the 4-6% range. This may not sound important but I assure you it is. When your on a team producing over 1 million points a day a loss of 5% when your chasing teams is a huge number. Is my math on this correct? If not please show me my errors. I've just spent the past 3 hours trying to calm down over 100 people wondering why they are all of a sudden seeing less points for the same amount of work and I would love to be able to go back to them and show the errors in the math. Thanks for your time. ![]() |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Just a comment Movieman
----------------------------------------Everyone is being treated equally so your loss of 5% is anothers loss of 5% So the race runs at the same speed and everyone catches or looses at the same rate. It is an attempt to normalise the results across all clients Windows/Linux and Mac which has been a sore subject and I am sorry to have to say some tweaking of the points system to gain positive advantage among members. The changes implemented by IBM go some way to addressing these 2 issues so everyone is been dealt an even hand. That still leaves the UD/BOINC discrepancy to iron out.... It's Sunday get outside and get a lung full or 2 of fresh air take a look at the World and then tell me this really really matters Honestly it "don’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world" Dave ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by David Autumns at Nov 12, 2006 9:03:02 AM] |
||
|
|
|