| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Active Research
Forum: Africa Rainfall Project
Thread: Work Available |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3596
|
|
| Author |
|
|
sptrog1
Master Cruncher Joined: Dec 12, 2017 Post Count: 1593 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
ARP seems to be back. I got one. It was tangled in the hopper of transfers but I was able to free it before the constipation in the bin starved me of other tasks. I was down to one task crunching and seven in the download mode. But I am happy to get it.
|
||
|
|
Unixchick
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Apr 16, 2020 Post Count: 1313 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Yeah ! I came home to ARPs running on my machine! I had to retry a few times to get them to download, but I'm so happy to have ARPs again!
|
||
|
|
catchercradle
Senior Cruncher England Joined: Jan 16, 2009 Post Count: 171 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Yep, getting the downloads to finish is proving intensive for the left mouse button though I have gotten up to six running now with more sort of downloading.
|
||
|
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2356 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
My device-caches had so many tasks (i.e. OPN1 and MCM1) in their queues, that the swiftly downloaded (thanks to wcgresults -x in their crontabs) ARP1-tasks still haven't started running yet. One device is even so busy with OPN1- and MCM1-tasks that still no ARP1-tasks have turned up there.
Side note: One ARP1-task is - completely by chance - coupled with another task that was mentioned by Aperture_Science_Innovators (hi!): workunit 228993295 ARP1_0019365_133_0 Fedora Linux In Progress 2022-12-09T18:09:50 2022-12-15T18:09:50 |
||
|
|
Taurus Oldbull
Advanced Cruncher US Joined: Nov 26, 2020 Post Count: 59 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hi Cyclops,
Please note that all the ARP tasks I received have 3-day deadlines, instead of the normal 5-day deadlines, even though they all have -0 or -1 at the end of their identifiers, which should indicate that they are initial runs, not repeats. Thanks. |
||
|
|
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 787 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
3 days matches units in catchup after earlier failures.
----------------------------------------I have 2 from gen 134 with 6 day. See also below post from previous page of this thread. https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewpostinthread?post=679243 Paul.
Paul.
|
||
|
|
Taurus Oldbull
Advanced Cruncher US Joined: Nov 26, 2020 Post Count: 59 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hi Paul,
Don't units with previous failures always get suffixes higher than -1 ? |
||
|
|
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 787 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
There are 2 situations:
----------------------------------------1 a unit suffers a failure on 1 system so an additional unit is sent as _1, _2 etc. 2 a unit fails for all and requires re-issue with changed parameters. Several units suffered case 2 and had to be re-run from earlier generations. These are sent with shorter deadlines so they catch up with the rest. See also other posts in this thread and others. Paul.
Paul.
|
||
|
|
DCS1955
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 24, 2016 Post Count: 668 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I have received 20 WU during the evening of the 12-9. I to nurse downloadingthe large number of 42M files. Seemed to take forever. I don't recall this nursing required in the old WCG. Is this a known issue for the new WCG? TIA
----------------------------------------  |
||
|
|
Unixchick
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Apr 16, 2020 Post Count: 1313 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The slow downloading is a known issue for WCG. They are getting more SSDs (faster than what they have) to see if that helps. If I understand the situation correctly.
|
||
|
|
|