Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 566
|
![]() |
Author |
|
rbotterb
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Jul 21, 2005 Post Count: 401 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
cjslman, you can always bring down some extra CFSW WUs, and them limit your GFAM WUs to only part of your CPUs. I've done that before when a project started to toss huge WUs at me and clog things up. GFAM recently INCREASED their WUs by 90%! I kind of wished for us smaller crunchers they cut them in one-half instead of making us little guys have to run 3-5 calendar days to get one of them done. Oh well, such is life....
|
||
|
cjslman
Master Cruncher Mexico Joined: Nov 23, 2004 Post Count: 2082 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
rbotterb... thanks for the suggestion... it didn't occur to me to assign the ginormous GFAM WUs to individual CPUs. I'll give it a try.
----------------------------------------Thanks, CJSL |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I'm within 21 days of sapphire, now, which is the goal I set when they announced it was nearing completion.
Since I had a 2-3 day cache on most machines and I count 3.5 days in PV, I've switched the 12 cores I had on it back to SN2S/DDDT2, and have lowered all their caches back down to 1.25 days. So, good luck to everyone else meeting their goals on this task, as well. ![]() --------------- |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
back to malaria now
|
||
|
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher Norway Joined: Nov 19, 2005 Post Count: 974 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Todays update, as always the time is UTC+2:
----------------------------------------01.09.2012 23:03:59 | World Community Grid | Started download of cfsw_16506_16506069_D16506069.sql Due to the outage this is a large jump, if averages over two days the current speed is 324.5 series/day. More work going out isn't unexpected, since some users increasing their caches often happens after an outage. Some work was likely also cancelled due to corrupted file-system, leading to a further increase in work-demand. ![]() "I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might." |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Just got my badge so I dumped the rest of my work units. Over 200.
|
||
|
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Post Count: 1027 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Congratulations, Brook/Brink! And thanks for releasing your unneeded WUs!
----------------------------------------Pretty sure I'm going to make it, too. I need to be able to crunch full tilt for 16 more calendar days, so if WUs are available for even 8 or 10 more days and I fill an 8-day cache on all my machines, I can do it. ![]() |
||
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
I like your odds. With the bad batches and the server issues there will be far more units sent out as redundant. I expect an extension of at least one day in available results.
----------------------------------------![]() Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
For Sekerob, this is the highest result number I could find:
----------------------------------------cfsw_ 16559_ 16559088_ 0-- L2-PC In Progress 9/2/12 00:17:56 It's gonna be real hard to estimate time left as most of the results I'm getting currently are still in the 13xxx and 14xxx batches. ![]() Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
No worry... by the time we're into 17000 it is likely sequential again. FTM, simply going by the returned results. There are 1000 per batch, so yesterday(+Friday) with 326,586 valids, there were ~327 batches processed. The buffers I'm considering to be chock-a-block by Monday.
|
||
|
|
![]() |