Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 119
Posts: 119   Pages: 12   [ Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 13093 times and has 118 replies Next Thread
gb077492
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Dec 24, 2004
Post Count: 96
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of

Thanks, Al!
[Feb 2, 2011 9:09:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1670
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of

Hi,
I experienced also problems with WIN XP 64 (Xeon) with the following WUs:
  • ts02_ c247_ sr67a0_ 2-- 14.62 222.1
  • ts02_ c247_ sr45b1_ 2-- 14.61 222.1
  • ts02_ c283_ sr02b1_ 0-- 12.20 222.3
  • ts02_ c283_ sr02b0_ 1-- 12.20 218.2

and with WinXP Pro 32 (Q6600):
  • ts02_ c395_ sqa005_ 2-- 14.70 215.4

Additionally, I observed several invalid WUs only with hosts based on Phenom II CPU:
  • ts02_ b469_ pr67b0_ 1--
  • ts02_ b469_ pcb013_ 0--
  • ts02_ b454_ pr02b1_ 1--
  • ts02_ b364_ pr67a0_ 0--
  • ts02_ b364_ pr56b0_ 1--
  • ts02_ b364_ pr56a0_ 0--
  • ts02_ b315_ pr56b0_ 0--
  • ts02_ b272_ pqa004_ 1--
  • ts02_ b254_ pca014_ 0--
  • ts02_ a231_ sr34b0_ 0--

Yves
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by KerSamson at Feb 4, 2011 7:06:37 AM]
[Feb 4, 2011 12:27:19 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of


Additionally, I observed several invalid WUs only with hosts based on Phenom II CPU:
Yves


Interesting. I wrote on another thread about getting many "Inconclusives" in this batch of DDDT2. I was seeing about a 5% rate of the Inconclusive becoming an Invalid for either me or one of my wingmen. My machine that was running mostly DDDT2 at that time, and that got several invalids, is a Phenom II X4 610e.

I haven't been running much DDDT2 in the last week or two, so haven't had the opportunity to observe any of the most recent problems.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 4, 2011 2:02:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1670
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of

Hi Kateiacy,
I am crunching since some days DDDT2 only. Based on the number of processed WUs, there are really few invalid WUs. For this reason, I cannot assume that a project incompatibility does exist with this CPU (for example based on a compilation failure or on illegal statement).
Indeed, the invalid WUs are located on a Phenom II x6 with Win XP Pro 32 and on another Phenom II x6 with Ubuntu 10.05 LTS. Because the both Phenom II, regardless of the OS does experience these small troubles and the Xeon, Q6600, Q9450 do not, the failure should reside by the CPU (but only from time to time thinking )
Cheers,
Yves
----------------------------------------
[Feb 4, 2011 6:49:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of

Someonposted this link on another DDDT2 thread:

http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/HomogeneousRedundancy

I wonder how this "hr" is set for DDDT2. It certainly could affect how differences betweeen AMD and Intel results on the same WU were treated.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 5, 2011 11:59:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GB033533
Senior Cruncher
UK
Joined: Dec 8, 2004
Post Count: 198
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of

has anyone received any credit for these long running wus ending in error?
or are they a lost cause?
----------------------------------------

[Feb 6, 2011 4:34:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb077492
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Dec 24, 2004
Post Count: 96
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of

has anyone received any credit for these long running wus ending in error?


Yes!

As I understand it, if two wingmen successfully process the WU, those two will receive credit in the normal way and all those with an error will receive nothing. But if only one or none of the wingmen complete normally, then everyone receives the credit that they claimed.

So far, I have received the claimed credit for all my failing, long-running WUs.
[Feb 6, 2011 4:55:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rembertw
Senior Cruncher
Belgium
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Post Count: 275
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of

I'm now processing ts02_ c395_ sqb005_ 4-- with _0 still IP, and version _1, _2 and _3 errored out.

--------------------------------------------------------
<message>
Maximum elapsed time exceeded
</message>
<stderr_txt>
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
Copying wcgrestart.rst


Unhandled Exception Detected...

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Breakpoint Encountered (0x80000003) at address 0x752922A1

Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...
---------------------------------------------

Maybe old news, maybe helpful...
[Feb 7, 2011 2:58:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: DDDT2 Wu Failures of

Too Late (in more ways than one) but duely got credit,

ts02_ c395_ sqa009_ 4-- 617 Error 07/02/11 18:23:34 10/02/11 11:31:24 8.77 263.8 / 263.8
ts02_ c395_ sqa009_ 3-- 617 Too Late 06/02/11 04:48:08 06/02/11 06:45:50 1.73 24.8 / 24.8
ts02_ c395_ sqa009_ 2-- 617 Error 03/02/11 19:13:44 06/02/11 04:24:54 12.69 180.7 / 180.7
ts02_ c395_ sqa009_ 1-- 617 User Aborted 02/02/11 18:59:00 07/02/11 18:23:27 21.70 233.8 / 233.8
ts02_ c395_ sqa009_ 0-- 617 Error 02/02/11 18:58:51 03/02/11 18:39:21 11.45 223.9 / 223.9

Project Name: Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2
Created: 31/01/11
Name: ts02_c395_sqa009
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 2
[Feb 21, 2011 6:35:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 119   Pages: 12   [ Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread