| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2 Forum
Thread: DDDT2 Wu Failures |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 119
|
|
| Author |
|
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
These were not late, they were PV, with wingman "Waiting to be sent" agree.
Cheers ! GIB@
  Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Let me explain... An incomplete quorum Pending Validation result can't pass through the validator. What the techs do is kick them into a Too Late state, though they aren't. This allows, similar to the ''Error'' results, to run a script to allocate the credit without there being quorum.
----------------------------------------Capice... Yes/No? Note that standard BOINC policy is that Error/Too Late are worth squad in credit, so the techs devised a scheme around that and grant credit for time/results/points.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
Ok Sekerob, I understood your coment since you posted, but agree with Fredski that not appear be right due exactly by the explanation posted by him.
----------------------------------------Maybe, due the many situations faced by all of us that we saw this year (just to take a sample), with WU's in Beta's and in production releases distributed, WCG tech team could use a new status term that allow all, at a glance, to know that any specific WU returned will have a special treatment (due a sort of problems...). I don't have idea what could be the best term to define this new term status suggested. Today I saw that "other" status was used to define cancelled WU's which wasn't distributed, after the issue identified in this DDDT2 wave. Just an idea. Thank you anyway.
Cheers ! GIB@
Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
After another look, I see that the few I had, have been given credit.
|
||
|
|
cw64
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Oct 6, 2007 Post Count: 120 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Let me explain... An incomplete quorum Pending Validation result can't pass through the validator. What the techs do is kick them into a Too Late state, though they aren't. This allows, similar to the ''Error'' results, to run a script to allocate the credit without there being quorum. Capice... Yes/No? Note that standard BOINC policy is that Error/Too Late are worth squad in credit, so the techs devised a scheme around that and grant credit for time/results/points. What about the actual result? Does it get trashed?  |
||
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 200 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
DDDT2 units seem to be rare commodities at the moment - and then you get one - another potential hour or two to the total and another WU processed - excellent - and then after an hour it errors-out...... Looking at the unit log, all three instances issued have run to error - and there are two more lined up for issue but appear to be being held.....why are two more lined up for issue?? If it has run to error 3 times - isn't that enough evidence that it is a bad unit, why waste more time??
----------------------------------------ts05_a148_sqa007 <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> < |
||
|
|
BladeD
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 28976 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
After another look, I see that the few I had, have been given credit. Me too!  |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Summing it up on 36 received for this Dec.2, 2010 run:
----------------------------------------ts01/ts02 - 100% valid or pv (24 total) ts05 - 25% valid (3 of 12), 4 outright error, 5 aborted by user (moi) based on result error by wingman Those that need wingman, with clean logs, to include ts05!: ts05_ a313_ pla007_ 0-- 1292373 Pending Validation 3-12-10 03:24:15 5-12-10 13:31:39 4.68 84.8 / 0.0 ts02_ a176_ se0000_ 0-- 1292373 Pending Validation 2-12-10 23:38:20 4-12-10 19:52:49 4.84 88.2 / 0.0 ts01_ c296_ se0000_ 1-- 1292373 Pending Validation 2-12-10 22:12:30 3-12-10 17:02:33 4.92 89.7 / 0.0 ts01_ c297_ se0000_ 0-- 1292373 Pending Validation 2-12-10 22:12:30 3-12-10 14:42:54 4.84 88.2 / 0.0 ts01_ b390_ se0000_ 1-- 95711 Pending Validation 2-12-10 21:36:57 5-12-10 00:40:51 6.90 69.2 / 0.0 ts01_ b249_ se0000_ 1-- 1292373 Pending Validation 2-12-10 21:10:45 3-12-10 12:14:30 4.83 88.1 / 0.0 ts01_ b206_ se0000_ 0-- 95711 Pending Validation 2-12-10 21:06:33 3-12-10 15:01:42 6.85 68.7 / 0.0 One thing was consistent: If there was a fail, it was same for both copies, and always right at point of completion. --//--
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
One thing was consistent: If there was a fail, it was same for both copies, and always right at point of completion. I had many that failed right at the start and not at point of completion, like the one below.  Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit ts05_ a320_ pcb008_ 2-- 617 Error 12/3/10 03:28:36 12/3/10 16:47:50 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 ts05_ a320_ pcb008_ 1-- 617 Error 12/3/10 03:07:06 12/3/10 12:22:34 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 ts05_ a320_ pcb008_ 0-- 617 Error 12/3/10 03:06:46 12/3/10 03:20:57 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 ts05_ a320_ pcb008_ 3-- - Waiting to be sent — — 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 ts05_ a320_ pcb008_ 4-- - Waiting to be sent — — 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
  |
||
|
|
Hypernova
Master Cruncher Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland Joined: Dec 16, 2008 Post Count: 1908 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It is frustrating when you get so little of this project, that is three or four WU's once in a month and then half of them errors out.
----------------------------------------Two last examples. One from Saturn device: Result Name: ts05_ a141_ pr34b0_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> riture impossible sur le piphique spifi (0x1d) - exit code 29 (0x1d) </message> <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. Encountered error. Exiting. </stderr_txt> ]]> and from Pluto device: Result Name: ts05_ a146_ pqa009_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> riture impossible sur le piphique spifi (0x1d) - exit code 29 (0x1d) </message> <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. Encountered error. Exiting. </stderr_txt> ]]> One is IP at the moment and the other one has Validated. If anybody has an idea what these errors mean. My understanding is that one phrase is in french but the text is truncated and would mean: riture impossible sur le piphique spifi Correction: "Ecriture impossible sur le périphérique specifié" Translation in English: "Writing impossible on the specified peripheral." So any ideas?  [Edit 2 times, last edit by Hypernova at Dec 6, 2010 7:18:56 AM] |
||
|
|
|