Oh, and for that platform bounce, after fixing that bit, the lost result got resend... systems nominal:

Sun 25 apr 2010 17:54:34 CEST World Community Grid Message from server: Resent lost result HFCC_s2_01920238_s2_0000_0
Sun 25 apr 2010 17:54:36 CEST World Community Grid Started download of wcg_hfcc_autodock_6.11_i686-pc-linux-gnu
Sun 25 apr 2010 17:54:36 CEST World Community Grid Started download of wcg_hfcc_autodock_graphics_6.11_i686-pc-linux-gnu
Sun 25 apr 2010 17:54:38 CEST World Community Grid Finished download of wcg_hfcc_autodock_graphics_6.11_i686-pc-linux-gnu

No wireless, nop, though the WIFI router says it's been connected to the hosts for hours, the host wont have it. The cable has been rolled up before someone stumbles, the purpose of doing this exersize hands on to see how HFCC and HCC would do. They're screaming through on 64 bit Ubuntu 10.04, so much so that the HCC tasks on W7-64 used to run under the latest version between 145-160 minutes. Now... drums rolling 64 minutes!

X0000075930338200609251142_ 1-- 1234035 Pending Validation 25-4-10 19:35:48 25-4-10 20:41:33 1.06 30.2 / 0.0
HFCC_ s2_ 01924769_ s2_ 0001_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 25-4-10 15:54:51 25-4-10 20:27:04 4.43 125.8 / 0.0
HFCC_ s2_ 01925849_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 25-4-10 15:54:51 25-4-10 19:35:48 3.30 93.8 / 0.0

PS: and Linux even ripped the desktop images from my W7 and integrated all document folders... did they learn something from Redmond?

Running client 6.10.17 as it came with the distro and after some sudo root pwd chown chattr and hacking the etc/boinc-client folder to get my old parms into cc_config.xml remote_hosts.cfg andf gui-rpc-auth.cfg, it's as if nothing changed, but the execution speed of the tasks. BOINCTasks is connecting well from the laptop and controlling the client.

Yawn... bed time after all that excitement, pipe-dreaming about the double credit, how else are we going to show doubled TFL ;o)

Wow! Are these results still coming from your Q6600 at stock speed?
If yes either you have got rather light WUs or Ubuntu 10.04 is even faster than 9.10.
3.35 for HFCC is my 9th best out of 41 complete WUs still in my Results Status and mine is clocked at 3.16 GHz.

@Jean,

yes, stock, not clockable, and apart from the variability in HFCC, see this morning´s upload with a best of 2.55 hours:

HFCC_ s2_ 01927124_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 15:54:51 4/26/10 05:48:19 2.55 69.0 / 0.0
HFCC_ s2_ 01926731_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 15:54:51 4/26/10 05:47:58 2.65 71.9 / 0.0
X0000075930285200609251144_ 1-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/26/10 05:12:21 1.08 29.2 / 0.0
HFCC_ s2_ 01929338_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 15:54:51 4/26/10 05:08:25 3.28 88.9 / 0.0
X0000075930301200609251143_ 1-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/26/10 05:08:25 1.03 27.9 / 0.0
X0000075930305200609251143_ 1-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/26/10 05:08:25 1.06 28.8 / 0.0
X0000075930295200609251143_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/26/10 05:08:25 1.43 38.8 / 0.0
X0000075930298200609251143_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/26/10 05:08:25 1.04 28.1 / 0.0
X0000075930289200609251143_ 1-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/26/10 05:08:25 1.01 27.3 / 0.0
HFCC_ s2_ 01929128_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 15:54:51 4/26/10 05:07:46 4.21 114.0 / 0.0
HFCC_ s2_ 01928018_ s2_ 0001_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 15:54:50 4/26/10 05:07:46 9.07 245.7 / 0.0
HFCC_ s2_ 01920238_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 15:54:30 4/25/10 23:40:14 7.56 210.9 / 0.0
X0000075930330200609251143_ 0-- 1234035 Valid 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/25/10 23:25:13 1.05 29.4 / 18.6
X0000075930312200609251143_ 1-- 1234035 Valid 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/25/10 23:25:13 1.06 29.7 / 15.3
X0000075930332200609251143_ 0-- 1234035 Pending Validation 4/25/10 19:35:48 4/25/10 23:24:51 1.09 30.6 / 0.0

Essentially, from the old HCC under W7-64 to the new 6.08 under LL 10.04 they´re running 4 times faster, compared to the old under Vista, almost 5x.

So how do these babies compare to your fastest, not that I´m particularly exited about credit rules [for which we all deny ourselves the truth is what co-drives such effort]

@Uplinger,

N is just soooo much faster and getting any device to talk in G to the router would pull the whole network down from 270Mhz to not even 54Mhz. I had on an old Hardy Heron test the G working alright, on a G router. I´ll give it a go maybe later today... the errant list is brutal.

Well the progress on G is, no G, no A, No B. The device is seen, it asks about 5 times for the WAP-PSK2 password, in fact when typing the password it already knows it correct as only then does the OK button activate. Even pulled a known working G only USB wireless stick and it wont work... same experience... the router sees the client, but is not passing the handshake to commence data transmission. Think I'll dig further into the RALINK 2870 driver stuff and the ndiswrapper tool to incorporate the windows driver, but that's on that same steep curve as the last 700 hundred meters to our front porch.

As to work,

HPF2 successful, albeit only one job. Runtime about same as windows.

HCC 15 valid of first 15 completed... gottah love these just running ~1:06 - ~1:20 hours.

HFCC seems to be somewhat faster than on windows, though what can one say if even the laptop does them in 2:30 hours presently, then the next in 14.

FAAH and HCMD2 next up on the test bed.

Mind you, the responsiveness feel is substantially better in use than 8.04.

Now where is the lm-sensor control hidden? The package is default installed, got GKrellM working, fancontrol is there too by design. Need to get that going as the continuous downwind up and down howling of the fans as controlled by the BIOS's saveguardian starts to nerve.