| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5561
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
But as for Mankind being able to prevent a future inundation of a city from rising sea levels well just ask King Canute about that especially as, if this story is to believed, our weapon of choice for this global battle is to reduce the atmospheric concentration of CO2 from 0.0388% back to it's claimed pre-industrial level of 0.0280% while always remembering that this completely non-toxic trace gas is responsible for all the food and consequently life on this wonderful blue marble we live on taking not a small part in Photosynthesis. This is not an argument, but a recitation of a trivial fact. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
He heard it through the grapevine, yes there are Freemasons members amongst the eskimos Don't forget the Illuminati and the Bilderberg Group! You're missing the BIG picture! ![]() |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Absolutely beautiful, from Open Mind, where RIP van Winkle would have been kept awake:
----------------------------------------Growthgate February 16, 2010 · 1 Comment Suppose you have a child, a son — he’s 10. You want to know whether or not he’s growing normally, so every day you measure his height with a tape measure. You’ve done so since he was 5. You even plot the data on a graph, and notice two things about it. First: the measurements show a fair amount of jitter, sometimes they’re a wee bit higher, sometimes a wee bit lower, there’s noise in the data. Second: there’s also a trend. Your kid is a lot taller at 10 than he was at 5, in fact the trend over the observed time span is upward and reasonably steady. You even do a statistical analysis, estimate the growth rate, and determine that it’s definitely statistically significant — so it’s not a false trend due to noise in the data, it’s real. Your son is growing normally. Then you’re interviewed by a reporter from the Daily Mail. He asks, “Can you prove — with statistical significance — that your child has been growing since last Tuesday?” You reply that no, even though the trend over that time span is upward, it’s not statistically significant. The next day you read the article in the Daily Mail which is titled, “Growthgate U-turn as parent admits: There has been no growth since last Tuesday.” You protest. “I never said my child wasn’t growing! I just said that the data over such a short time span didn’t show it with statistical significance! That’s only because on such a short time scale, the noise obscures the trend.” Alas, it’s too late, the damage is done, because 3500 blogs have repeated the article from the Daily Mail and child protective services has been asked to investigate your fitness as a parent. Sound familiar?
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
allegory, tautology, would the above qualify as an analogy what ain't true-ists can't see ;?
----------------------------------------Watch this video from Corriere Della Sera http://www.corriere.it/cronache/10_febbraio_1...f-af4a-00144f02aabe.shtml This is not due tectonics... this is first humans undermining the stability, then heavy rains soaking the underground's last holds. Yes We Can, Yes We Do, Yes We Will!
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
In the final part of a 12 part Guardian article investigating leaked climate e-mails, what is their conclusion in the last paragraph?
----------------------------------------http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/fe...ails-truth-global-warming Climate science emails cannot destroy argument that world is warming, and humans are responsible "Climate scientists will have to work harder to earn the warranted trust of the public – and maybe that is no bad thing," says Hulme. While science gets its house in order, we need some perspective. In the midst of a cold winter (in the U.K.) it may be hard to convince ourselves, but the world is still warming. Humanity is still to blame. And we still, urgently, need to do something about it.
SUPPORT ADVISOR
----------------------------------------Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% [Edit 1 times, last edit by retsof at Feb 16, 2010 9:00:43 PM] |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
on the other hand.....there is this truth
----------------------------------------http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703630404575053781465774008.html == Who, if they are claiming the end of civilisation as we know it, had better be absolutely sure of water tight/cast iron evidence before proceeding to put fear into the hearts of every Man, Woman and Child on the Planet? Have a peaceful night and keep warm. Dave ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Phil Jones seems to have changed his story---- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12508...a-organised.html?ITO=1490
|
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
This is the truth I am hoping will finally get heard Gerald
----------------------------------------Here's another one for you http://www.nzcpr.com/weekly216.htm They are peeling the skins off this onion - worldwide ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by David Autumns at Feb 17, 2010 12:39:45 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Here in the states today three big corporations dropped out of a cap and trade program.This will probably cause more to follow possibly, killing cap and trade in the US.If they
did this in Europe you would see jobs and work increase along with lower prices for energy |
||
|
|
|