| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5561
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Right now we have the chance to do something great Like a simple Thread LockAstroturf you need to lock your keyboard and read See Jane Run |
||
|
|
Johnny Cool
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 28, 2005 Post Count: 8621 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Right now we have the chance to do something great Like a simple Thread LockAstroturf you need to lock your keyboard and read See Jane Run marysduby, I have not seen that movie/book 'See Jane Run'. Still, it's nice to know that you are not "Politically-Correct". I think we have far too many of the PC (Politically-Correct) crowd here. If they read "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand, there could be a change of philosophy (maybe). Ehh, who knows? LOL! It is an epic and rather important book for those who had to take 'Political Science' courses, so that they could get less than stellar jobs like mine and were not able to raise a zillion dollars to run for President as well . Actually, I would rather have my job than be President of the USA. LOL! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shrugged It's no wonder why I hardly make posts outside my "Team Recruiting" thread. I just hope I don't get anyone rattled (on my Team) if they see this one. ![]() |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Cheers Mr Cool
----------------------------------------![]() I'll treasure him After literally years of effort put into the "To the Greenies" thread I think I deserve to at least summarise the thrust of my personal opinion in the discussion about the absurdity that is catastrophic climate change Countless science links, news links, photo's, graphs and many many carefully crafted posts that don't simply jump onto peoples screens the world over - they take time, thought, research and effort to create. Hey even some humour along the way (I would hope) All now to be deleted Johnny now is the time to air the shakey headed chap ![]() appreciated Dave (Edited to add the img tags - oops) ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by David Autumns at Oct 9, 2009 7:04:13 AM] |
||
|
|
brown chris
Master Cruncher California - USA Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 2558 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Right now we have the chance to do something great Like a simple Thread LockQuit reading this thread if you don't like it... It will be like a lock to you.
BIG BANG THEORY: In the beginning there was nothing... which exploded
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
... After literally years of effort put into the "To the Greenies" thread I think I deserve to at least summarise the thrust of my personal opinion in the discussion about the absurdity that is catastrophic climate change Countless science links, news links, photo's, graphs and many many carefully crafted posts that don't simply jump onto peoples screens the world over - they take time, thought, research and effort to create. Hey even some humour along the way (I would hope) All now to be deleted ... I Like the "carefully crafted", Dave, particular when including your frequently used mnemonics in capitals, which I've always observed in private view as cherry picked, truncated, omissive and most certainly generally not corroborated by the largest body of scientists, of all walks of life. Hey and that's through my eyes from an environment where for 30 years science was science without supernatural and elusive forces turning knobs. Now how about that 6 million km square missing snow cover on the northern hemisphere, land [you qualify as 'normal'], Dave, and should you think of Arctic Sea Ice Recovery, the AREA Anomaly, the real sea ice grew in 16 days from 1.3 million to 1.8 million km square, NEGATIVE. It's the weather I'm sure, flick a switch and you've got energy out your ying/yang to prevent freezing and rain to turn to snow, if there is rain. You read it here in the Climate Blog at World Community Grid. But, read very carefully, don't cherry pick individual lines and references to anonymous 'scientists'... it's that little byline that says, we should be cooling, but we've been warming instead and done so at a rate of 10 times normal. Long debate ended over cause, demise of ice ages â may also help predict future: ttp://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2009/aug/long-debate-ended-over-cause-demise-ice-ages-%E2%80%93-may-also-help-predict-future CORVALLIS, Ore. â A team of researchers says it has largely put to rest a long debate on the underlying mechanism that has caused periodic ice ages on Earth for the past 2.5 million years â they are ultimately linked to slight shifts in solar radiation caused by predictable changes in EarthâÂÂs rotation and axis. In a publication to be released Friday in the journal Science, researchers from Oregon State University and other institutions conclude that the known wobbles in EarthâÂÂs rotation caused global ice levels to reach their peak about 26,000 years ago, stabilize for 7,000 years and then begin melting 19,000 years ago, eventually bringing to an end the last ice age. The melting was first caused by more solar radiation, not changes in carbon dioxide levels or ocean temperatures, as some scientists have suggested in recent years. âÂÂSolar radiation was the trigger that started the ice melting, thatâÂÂs now pretty certain,â said Peter Clark, a professor of geosciences at OSU. âÂÂThere were also changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and ocean circulation, but those happened later and amplified a process that had already begun.â The findings are important, the scientists said, because they will give researchers a more precise understanding of how ice sheets melt in response to radiative forcing mechanisms. And even though the changes that occurred 19,000 years ago were due to increased solar radiation, that amount of heating can be translated into what is expected from current increases in greenhouse gas levels, and help scientists more accurately project how EarthâÂÂs existing ice sheets will react in the future. âÂÂWe now know with much more certainty how ancient ice sheets responded to solar radiation, and that will be very useful in better understanding what the future holds,â Clark said. âÂÂItâÂÂs good to get this pinned down.â The researchers used an analysis of 6,000 dates and locations of ice sheets to define, with a high level of accuracy, when they started to melt. In doing this, they confirmed a theory that was first developed more than 50 years ago that pointed to small but definable changes in EarthâÂÂs rotation as the trigger for ice ages. âÂÂWe can calculate changes in the EarthâÂÂs axis and rotation that go back 50 million years,â Clark said. âÂÂThese are caused primarily by the gravitational influences of the larger planets, such as Jupiter and Saturn, which pull and tug on the Earth in slightly different ways over periods of thousands of years.â That, in turn, can change the EarthâÂÂs axis â the way it tilts towards the sun â about two degrees over long periods of time, which changes the way sunlight strikes the planet. And those small shifts in solar radiation were all it took to cause multiple ice ages during about the past 2.5 million years on Earth, which reach their extremes every 100,000 years or so. Sometime around now, scientists say, the Earth should be changing from a long interglacial period that has lasted the past 10,000 years and shifting back towards conditions that will ultimately lead to another ice age â unless some other forces stop or slow it. But these are processes that literally move with glacial slowness, and due to greenhouse gas emissions the Earth has already warmed as much in about the past 200 years as it ordinarily might in several thousand years, Clark said. âÂÂOne of the biggest concerns right now is how the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets will respond to global warming and contribute to sea level rise,â Clark said. âÂÂThis study will help us better understand that process, and improve the validity of our models.â The research was done in collaboration with scientists from the Geological Survey of Canada, University of Wisconsin, Stockholm University, Harvard University, the U.S. Geological Survey and University of Ulster. It was supported by the National Science Foundation and other agencies. About the OSU College of Science: As one of the largest academic units at OSU, the College of Science has 14 departments and programs, 13 pre-professional programs, and provides the basic science courses essential to the education of every OSU student. Its faculty are international leaders in scientific research. PS: Dr. James Hansen's GISTEMP also puts September'09 as the second warmest September since 1880. This agrees with Dr. Roy Spencer's UAH read out. In fact Dr. Roy's read out, base line corrected, is higher than supposedly all supposedly 'UHI distorted' GISTEMP and that is truly worrying. Wonder what that AMSU-E satellite is seeing down below. PPS, the negative Global Sea Ice anomaly also rose over that same period, by an even bigger amount. It's the weather that's causing this, really? PPPS, those who wish to visit the original article need to prefix an h to the link in the article. It's so readers can see the full address unobscured by ... PPPPS, this post was crafted too, to convey the inconvenient truth.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Oct 9, 2009 11:03:40 AM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Not much honing went into this. Arctic Sea Ice AREA (the real stuff), back to 2008 levels. The North East Passage continuing to be wide open (see famed Cryosphere).
----------------------------------------![]() edit: And JAXA ttp://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm this morning showing 2009 below 2008, concurring with Nansen Arctic Roos (from Norway). The Times they are a changing, but not for the better so is the observation. PS: don't forget to prefix the h to the link :)
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Oct 9, 2009 12:27:09 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Right now we have the chance to do something great Like a simple Thread LockAstroturf you need to lock your keyboard and read See Jane Run marysduby, I have not seen that movie/book 'See Jane Run'. Still, it's nice to know that you are not "Politically-Correct". I think we have far too many of the PC (Politically-Correct) crowd here. If they read "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand, there could be a change of philosophy (maybe). Ehh, who knows? LOL! It is an epic and rather important book for those who had to take 'Political Science' courses, so that they could get less than stellar jobs like mine and were not able to raise a zillion dollars to run for President as well . Actually, I would rather have my job than be President of the USA. LOL! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shrugged It's no wonder why I hardly make posts outside my "Team Recruiting" thread. I just hope I don't get anyone rattled (on my Team) if they see this one. ![]() Johnny Cool--thanks for the kind words and you are correct about Ayn Rand--by the way "See Jane Run" was a book i remember from the first or second grade when they were trying to teach us how to read--do come back and leave your opinion--its nice to have new perspective [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Oct 11, 2009 11:03:33 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Think you missed the Admin's post named "Forum Policy". Suggest you contact them directly via support@worldcommunitygrid.org should you need further clarification as one could infer you did not read it, regardless of the fact that you also posted a comment in that thread. Till then, lest you have something to say relevant to the discussion in the OP of David Autumns' started thread, you give it further wide berth IRRESPECTIVE of this being Chat Room or not. Having reviewed once again the Forum Policy, I can clearly see that this thread, as did the 2 closed threads in question clearly violate 4 points in the Policy. The ongoing existence of these threads I find depressing, although I can see that some of the posters, such as Sekerob, are attempting to shed light on the darkness. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Think you missed the Admin's post named "Forum Policy". Suggest you contact them directly via support@worldcommunitygrid.org should you need further clarification as one could infer you did not read it, regardless of the fact that you also posted a comment in that thread. Till then, lest you have something to say relevant to the discussion in the OP of David Autumns' started thread, you give it further wide berth IRRESPECTIVE of this being Chat Room or not. Having reviewed once again the Forum Policy, I can clearly see that this thread, as did the 2 closed threads in question clearly violate 4 points in the Policy. The ongoing existence of these threads I find depressing, although I can see that some of the posters, such as Sekerob, are attempting to shed light on the darkness. Astroturf--what is your point?Do you keep coming back just to irritate the good people in this thread?Whether you know it or not a lot of good information was deleted in those threads.I have a lot of respect for Seckerob even though i mostly disagree with him.Rules if unfair can and do be changed,if you cant contribute to the conversation why not ignore this part of the chat room? or start a conversation in another thread that you are passionate about and stop being negative ---Bad Bad boy [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Oct 12, 2009 1:31:24 AM] |
||
|
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Bacause that is the nature of religous war. You don't realize you're doomed until it's too late. You see a thread, read it, express an opinion and get your nose tweaked. Someone else comes along, reads it and tweaks back a little harder. Inevitably, the descent continues from there. Freedom of speech also comes with responsibility of speech. Not every post has to be responded to either. Some folks may enjoy a good banter back and forth. Fine, but with "religous" topics, the consequences of the banter are much more difficult to manage, something that hasn't gone well in the past. I've already violated my own self-imposed rule - if I'm not calm when I'm responding, I shouldn't be responding. All I know right now is that if I still feel this way tomorrow, there's a real good chance I'll walk away from WCG if not crunching all together.
----------------------------------------Sad part is that if we humans did what we ought to, this whole topic would be a non-issue. For Christians, it's called being a good steward of God's creation. For non-believers, it's called living in harmony with nature. The outdoorsy types have the same idea applied to a much simpler situation - leave the campsite cleaner than you found it. Over-simplified - well, someone will say so whether it is or not. Plus, I'll probably get told the errors of my way soon enough. I'm bound to at least annoy at least someone saying this too simply because right now, I really don't care what others think about my opinion and I'm not all that concerned about the consequences since, given how I feel right now, this may well be the last post I ever make as a cruncher. |
||
|
|
|