Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 580
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I've lost a lot of faith in WCG as they refuse to upgrade to modern technology. Give us GPU computing in WCG or I'll keep my main resources at projects that do! If Stanford can roll out a GPU client for FOLDING@HOME, why can't WCG with its IBM backing?
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jul 27, 2009 8:48:08 PM] |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Another small step of progress. Here are all the current statboxes with both the TinyURL and full url that you can use in your signatures and elsewere.
----------------------------------------- dc tinyurl.com/2lx88q dcstat.com/sig/2918.gif |
||
|
darth_vader
Veteran Cruncher A galaxy far, far away... Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Post Count: 514 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've lost a lot of faith in WCG as they refuse to upgrade to modern technology. Give us GPU computing in WCG or I'll keep my main resources at projects that do! If Stanford can roll out a GPU client for FOLDING@HOME, why can't WCG with its IBM backing? Saying that WCG refuses to upgrade to modern technology is a bit harsh. It's up to the individual projects to convert their applications to exploit GPUs, not the WCG organization itself. It seems that right now HCC is the only project considering a GPU version any time soon. I'm sure you are aware that this subject has been beaten to death in the other forums. - D |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I've lost a lot of faith in WCG as they refuse to upgrade to modern technology. Give us GPU computing in WCG or I'll keep my main resources at projects that do! If Stanford can roll out a GPU client for FOLDING@HOME, why can't WCG with its IBM backing? Saying that WCG refuses to upgrade to modern technology is a bit harsh. It's up to the individual projects to convert their applications to exploit GPUs, not the WCG organization itself. It seems that right now HCC is the only project considering a GPU version any time soon. I'm sure you are aware that this subject has been beaten to death in the other forums. - D Hey everyone. Thanks for your support and the introduction to the crunching community! I'm moving to XtremeSystems now because they embrace GPU crunching and the new wave of distributed computing technology. It was fun gents. I hope I see you all in the future. Your contributions to DC are truly worthwhile. - Jonathan P. Figdor |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I've lost a lot of faith in WCG as they refuse to upgrade to modern technology. Give us GPU computing in WCG or I'll keep my main resources at projects that do! If Stanford can roll out a GPU client for FOLDING@HOME, why can't WCG with its IBM backing? Saying that WCG refuses to upgrade to modern technology is a bit harsh. It's up to the individual projects to convert their applications to exploit GPUs, not the WCG organization itself. It seems that right now HCC is the only project considering a GPU version any time soon. I'm sure you are aware that this subject has been beaten to death in the other forums. - D Hey everyone. Thanks for your support and the introduction to the crunching community! I'm moving to XtremeSystems now because they embrace GPU crunching and the new wave of distributed computing technology. It was fun gents. I hope I see you all in the future. Your contributions to DC are truly worthwhile. - Jonathan P. Figdor WCG is still the source of the projects and "hosts" them. WCG should be pushing forth GPU crunching. The question has been asked many times but everytime it's always the same answer. If they're working on it, where are the results? |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I've lost a lot of faith in WCG as they refuse to upgrade to modern technology. Give us GPU computing in WCG or I'll keep my main resources at projects that do! If Stanford can roll out a GPU client for FOLDING@HOME, why can't WCG with its IBM backing? Saying that WCG refuses to upgrade to modern technology is a bit harsh. It's up to the individual projects to convert their applications to exploit GPUs, not the WCG organization itself. It seems that right now HCC is the only project considering a GPU version any time soon. I'm sure you are aware that this subject has been beaten to death in the other forums. - D Hey everyone. Thanks for your support and the introduction to the crunching community! I'm moving to XtremeSystems now because they embrace GPU crunching and the new wave of distributed computing technology. It was fun gents. I hope I see you all in the future. Your contributions to DC are truly worthwhile. - Jonathan P. Figdor WCG is still the source of the projects and "hosts" them. WCG should be pushing forth GPU crunching. The question has been asked many times but everytime it's always the same answer. If they're working on it, where are the results? The science applications have to be written for GPU. WCG does not write the science applications. Did you see this post by Sekerob regarding a study of Autodock performance on GPU? FAAH, DDDT, IADS, HFCC all use Autodock. http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/printpost?post=239413 Also, a NRW scientist made a post about why they are not using GPU. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jul 28, 2009 12:52:39 AM] |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 07/27 - All Members:
----------------------------------------Team rank movement report =========================
Points milestones report ======================== No points milestones found. ![]() Runtime milestones report ========================= No runtime milestones found. ![]() Results returned milestones report ================================== Dresser returned their 1,400th result ![]() New members report ================== No new members found. ![]() Retired members report ====================== Dataman retired from the team. ![]() For the week as a team: Statistics Total Run Time Points Results Team Records: Results Returned: 12/19/2007 2,522 Points: 05/06/2009 518,871 Runtime: 01/25/2006 1:123:00:53:34 Good crunching folks!!!! |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 07/27 - Active Members
----------------------------------------Active team members report ==========================
Note: Active members are those who earned points in the prior 30 days. Top Twenty active members returning points today: 01: RT - 70,713 points 02: esoteric17 - 49,508 points 03: marysduby - 46,179 points 04: parmesian - 28,028 points 05: NiceMedTexMD - 26,122 points 06: brown chris - 21,171 points 07: keithhenry - 18,126 points 08: Dave Bell - 13,098 points 09: Vuj - 11,779 points 10: Blueprint - 9,423 points 11: Coingames - 8,708 points 12: sulcata - 7,352 points 13: stares - 7,177 points 14: Airwolf_Liu - 4,595 points 15: Dresser - 4,577 points 16: Esteban69 - 4,027 points 17: johng - 3,451 points 18: wrr - 3,364 points 19: jamesjr934 - 2,545 points 20: Sunny L. Kae - 2,325 points Total points returned today: 364,453 Active members returning points today: 41 Average points per member active today: 8,889.09756 |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Retired members report ====================== Dataman retired from the team. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
RT
Master Cruncher USA - Texas - DFW Joined: Dec 22, 2004 Post Count: 2636 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've lost a lot of faith in WCG as they refuse to upgrade to modern technology. Give us GPU computing in WCG or I'll keep my main resources at projects that do! If Stanford can roll out a GPU client for FOLDING@HOME, why can't WCG with its IBM backing? I suppose that I have stirred the pot and caused Jonathan to leave WCG and MOT. I truly regret that as it certainly is not the fault of WCG as they don't write the code. Nor is it the fault of MOT. So I feel I should apologize to the team. Sorry. ![]() Now I wish I had not brought it up in the first place. Now DM as well!! I apologize again! Sorry Everyone! ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by RT at Jul 28, 2009 2:17:32 AM] |
||
|
|
![]() |