| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 170
|
|
| Author |
|
|
hunterkasy
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 300 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
beta_E000338_053A_002511001_1 cpu time 09:19:00 Progress: 53.062% to completion: 12:26:11
|
||
|
|
Johnny Cool
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 28, 2005 Post Count: 8621 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Johnny Cool, these are BETA work-units. If you don't want to run any betas, you need to remove the check in Beta Test area in "MY GRID". Not wanting to use the term "sarchasm", I have already done that.  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
You better push them ahead as they will run longer than initially estimated and certainly if planning to let them run concurrent. With "a bunch" you may miss the deadline, slow down the beta result, slow down the project resume (but you don't need to get a guilt complex ;>) One way to push them ahead is to get more of them. Having been lucky enough to read the beta announcement just after it was posted (advantage of going to bed late!), I increased my caches. One machine received a beta and happily kept working on one of its cached NRW WUs. So I bumped the cache up, restarted Boinc, and it fetched another beta. Then it decided that multiple betas actually gave it a time constraint, so it switched to working on a beta instead of NRW. |
||
|
|
BobCat13
Senior Cruncher Joined: Oct 29, 2005 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
If you please post a copy of the Result log, click on Pending Validation link, we can maybe learn if the result is not showing any of the illustrious "validating" but not really valid. My quad is 7:12 hours in on 2 'A' at 50.1%. This one finished on an Athlon XP 2800+ running puppy linux BETA_ E000442_ 847B_ 000c0k015_ 0-- Pending Validation 3/10/09 21:59:31 3/11/09 03:44:03 5.14 49.5 / 0.0 <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Calling gridPlatform.init() Calling initGraphics() INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
||
|
|
jamie.kotlewski
Cruncher Joined: Feb 7, 2007 Post Count: 32 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have a couple Beta's on the way here but got an error on one before it got going... Here it is.
<core_client_version>6.2.19</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Input file wcgrid_beta6_6.29_windows_intelx86 missing or invalid: -120 </message> ]]> Is this a problem on my part on my system or with the Workunit? I'd like to solve it to help get this project get going again. Thanks in Advance |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
...they will run longer than initially estimated... Not really. I got 4 type A estimated at 12+ hours which completed in 9.25 to 9.48 hours (all 4 running concurrently) and 4 type B estimated at 10+ hours are currently running with a projected duration of 3, 3.25, 4 and 5 hours. All the 4 type A have the same clean result log as BobCat13. The 4 type B currently running are page faulting a little less than the type A and have very different memory usage: the two fast ones use about 40 MB, one slower one use 80 MB and the slowest one use 150 MB. Cheers. Jean. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Info
BETA_ E000338_ 877A_ 00251k00r_ 1-- hett-6400 Error 10.03.09 18:38:55 11.03.09 04:09:48 6.54 115.3 / 0.0 Project Name: Beta Testing - The Clean Energy Project Created: 10.03.09 Name: BETA_E000338_877A_00251k00r Minimum Quorum: 2 Initial Replication: 2 Result Log <core_client_version>6.4.5</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Das System kann nicht auf das angegebene Ger schreiben. (0x1d) - exit code 29 (0x1d) </message> <stderr_txt> Calling initGraphics() INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. Encountered error. Exiting. </stderr_txt> ]]> Best regards Horst |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
...they will run longer than initially estimated... Not really. I got 4 type A estimated at 12+ hours which completed in 9.25 to 9.48 hours (all 4 running concurrently) and 4 type B estimated at 10+ hours are currently running with a projected duration of 3, 3.25, 4 and 5 hours. All the 4 type A have the same clean result log as BobCat13. The 4 type B currently running are page faulting a little less than the type A and have very different memory usage: the two fast ones use about 40 MB, one slower one use 80 MB and the slowest one use 150 MB. Cheers. Jean. Don't know, woke up and looked in on the quad/vista to see that the 2 'A' type running concurrently are now 14:35 hours with 45 minutes to go. The 'B' types are much faster, they ran together with the 'A' and finished in 6.9 and 4.8 hours respectively. Their logs look very clean: Result Log <core_client_version>6.6.11</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Calling initGraphics() INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Stock speed Q6600, so wonder if you're on XP or Vista and what clock to get them to finish in 9.25 / 9.5 hours, concurrently. Edit: Spelling
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Mar 11, 2009 7:50:21 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I must say that the B's are much faster ready than the A's...
The A's are still running, but almost all B's are ready now. the crunchtime of a B unit lays between 2 to 4 hours.  And... no error so far  |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
I have a couple Beta's on the way here but got an error on one before it got going... Here it is. <core_client_version>6.2.19</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Input file wcgrid_beta6_6.29_windows_intelx86 missing or invalid: -120 </message> ]]> Is this a problem on my part on my system or with the Workunit? I'd like to solve it to help get this project get going again. Thanks in Advance We've seen a few of these reports, 3 to be precise of 8 months: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/...7&submitbutton=Search. The BFS FAQ says: ERR_RSA_FAILED -120 BOINC couldn't check the encryption key on a file it downloaded. Does the file have a signature? Solution: Complain about it on the project's forums. BOINC will try to download the file again. Also try to reset the project. It may be that your public key is corrupt. A project reset should fix that.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
|