Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 170
Posts: 170   Pages: 17   [ Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 24197 times and has 169 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

Another error sad
Seems the only beta's out there are resends of wu's that keep errorring with everyone.

Not the only ones. I picked up one a couple of hours ago which one machine ran a decent length (inconclusive) and one bombed out (error) at about half that length. My deadline of 29 hours, 40 mins from sending is slightly unachievable (expected completion is 31.9 hours). Even the original deadlines given to the original WUs would have been made easily.
EDIT: None of this matters. It bombed on my machine too....
[ERROR] Failed to open either source or destination files while copying wcgrestart.rst to ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/BETA_E000338_075A_00251100n_2_3. Error: 2

So, there should be a spike of good WUs exactly 4 days after the original batch, when various machines are found not to have completed on time. (... even if they are about to soon.)
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 13, 2009 2:22:54 PM]
[Mar 13, 2009 8:09:57 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

The beta's you are crunching now are the repair ones of the beta's from a couple of days ago. Some of them were not returned in time, were inconclusive or errored out and then a new copy is sent out in order to get usable results for that WU. The chance that such a WU fails can be higher, but that depends on several things.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 13, 2009 8:35:53 AM]
[Mar 13, 2009 8:33:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

My first two beta's went fine, finished in 11 and 14 hours.
[Mar 13, 2009 10:17:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

Got 2 repair WU, plus one original still pending.
[Mar 13, 2009 12:37:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jasm580
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Post Count: 157
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

I just picked up a couple of Beta that have previously errored out multiple times. So is it worth letting them run or should I just abort them?

-Jasm
----------------------------------------
-Jasm
[Mar 13, 2009 2:35:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

I just picked up a couple of Beta that have previously errored out multiple times. So is it worth letting them run or should I just abort them?

-Jasm

Sombody else will get another repair WU then (till max 7 sent-outs), so for the grid it's not wise to do, but probably for you it is. It can be however that is will not error-out. I've seen WU's that were finished correctly on Windows while errored-out on Linux for instance. So it's up to you.
[Mar 13, 2009 8:02:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

I just picked up a couple of Beta that have previously errored out multiple times. So is it worth letting them run or should I just abort them?

-Jasm

Yes, please let them run. The purpose of Beta is to find out what works and what does not. Even from errors we learn... could be the last bit of information pointing at a particular OS/CPU/RAM/Client Version combo.

thanks
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Mar 13, 2009 8:07:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

With the crunchers being awarded points even if the Beta errors out, everyone really needs to let all the Betas run and hope that by our beta testing, the Techs and Scientists can figure out how to prevent the errors from reoccurring.
[Mar 13, 2009 8:16:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

With the crunchers being awarded points even if the Beta errors out

If that were ever to happen, that would be great. I've never experienced it, so I believe the conclusion from this premise is flawed.
[Mar 13, 2009 11:16:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test Clean Energy Type A / B version 6.29

When additional credits are awarded, the work unit status (including granted credit) is not updated.
[Mar 13, 2009 11:33:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 170   Pages: 17   [ Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread