Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: Nutritious Rice for the World Thread: The Initial Rice Technical Questions Thread |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 159
|
Author |
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Update:
----------------------------------------So far I have completed 39 wu’s; 38 pending validation, 1 error, 0 valid Of the 38 pending, 33 of them (87%) have one or more errors in the initial replication. The average claim for a P4 duo is about 60 credits; Q6600 is about 122 credits. |
||
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Just to give everyone a status. The following issues have been identified and the fix applied:
----------------------------------------
The following issues are being investigated now:
We will continue to send out work for the project as we received over 2000 results successfully so far. [Edit 1 times, last edit by knreed at May 13, 2008 2:49:28 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thanks for the update Kevin
The following issues are being investigated now:
Noticed that earlier Kevin whilst looking at Task Manager....some heavy RAM usage on 2 wu's, and one in particular, compared to the others: |
||
|
BobCat13
Senior Cruncher Joined: Oct 29, 2005 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
I have 36 RICE tasks queued that all have the 1.5MB filesize limit. Instead of aborting all of them, is it possible to edit the client_state file and change the limit myself? Here is some data for an output file: <name>R00000_0f42cd9f696c7cb7d97196270bebc6f7_06_17_0</name> <nbytes>0.000000</nbytes> <max_nbytes>1500000.000000</max_nbytes> <generated_locally/> <status>0</status> <upload_when_present/> <gzip_when_done/> <url>https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/boinc/w...pload_handler</url> <signed_xml> <name>R00000_0f42cd9f696c7cb7d97196270bebc6f7_06_17_0</name> <generated_locally/> <upload_when_present/> <max_nbytes>1500000</max_nbytes> <url>https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/boinc/w...pload_handler</url> <gzip_when_done/> </signed_xml> If I change the two <max_nbytes> entries to 6000000, will that allow the output files to exceed 1.5MB? Since I have a Q6600 running at 3.2GHz, I am anticipating some of the files going over the 1.5MB limit. [Edit 1 times, last edit by BobCat13 at May 13, 2008 4:28:35 PM] |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
BobCat13,
----------------------------------------Could not recommend that, but if willing to live dangerously.... you know the drill and stop the daemon/service and make backup including the client_state_prev.xml. Fixed run time 8 hours, 36 queued is 3 days solid crunching. cheers
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
We believe that we have fixed the memory lead and one of the major additional errors. We will be starting a beta test within 45 minutes. This is going to be a fast beta test with 6 hour deadlines (workunits will take 1 hour).
Once this version is released, along with the corrected file size limits, we expect to see 65% fewer errors. Additionally, fixing these problems will reduce the amount of cpu time lost due to errors by 95%. |
||
|
David_L6
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Post Count: 296 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Well I'm still getting size errors saying they have exceeded the old 1.5MB limit despite the adjustment, so like Lawrence said above they perhaps have the limit set within the WU's themselves and I need new ones? Hopefully Kevin will be able to confirm. If you want to abort them, go ahead. Post here when you are done. NOTE TO OTHERS: Only the above average computers are going to be impacted by this issue. If you haven't seen this issue yet, it is not likely that you are going to. Only abort if you know that you have seen this. Also - results that allow greater file sizes (now set at 6MB) are already going out. I aborted all of the "Rice" WUs that I received yesterday. No doubt that my overclocked quad cores would have received nothing but errors. |
||
|
David_L6
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Post Count: 296 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
We believe that we have fixed the memory lead and one of the major additional errors. We will be starting a beta test within 45 minutes. This is going to be a fast beta test with 6 hour deadlines (workunits will take 1 hour). Once this version is released, along with the corrected file size limits, we expect to see 65% fewer errors. Additionally, fixing these problems will reduce the amount of cpu time lost due to errors by 95%. Send them on. I have the Beta project checked in my profiles. I'm running Core 2 Quads with minimum of 2GB RAM in every machine and I have a variety of operating systems: 32 bit XP Pro, 32 bit Vista Ultimate, 32 bit Vista Business, 64 bith Vista Ultimate, 64 bit Server 2008...... If there's still a problem with faster machines I should see it. I'll also throw a 3.4GHz P4 Northwood with XP Home on here just to see what happens with it. |
||
|
David_L6
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Post Count: 296 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
We will be starting a beta test within 45 minutes. Have any Betas been sent out yet? I haven't received any. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Just to report something I noticed:
I'm not seeing any error messages other than Task R00001_<whatever> exited with zero status but no 'finished' file If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. However I'm running this app on 4 hosts and only one of them gets this error -- and it gets it every time. The result output looks OK, except for the can't open pdb for appending message; they're all currently are in pending status. The host with these messages is a Mac(book Pro), the other 3 are Windows. Also it's a dual core, the others are H/T P4 or less. My prefs limit BONC to 1 cpu. I can do what it suggests and reset the project on this host, but I'm a bit skeptical that will make a difference. |
||
|
|