lol at least u didn't try to turn round and say i didn't know what i was talking about but hey ur rite i don't have to which is why i'm sticking to the ud one so i proberly won't be posting again but i like the fact that i'm helping out on something but why sud i use a program i know that is **** someone answer me that just so i can help find a cure for something sure i wud use it if it worked how ud did but no it doesn't work that good at all but hey people don't like it when something is slanted and as for forcing a gun to my head i loved that gave me the best laugh on here yet

**Edited for inappropriate language**

GOKUSSJ3 - please read and abide by the forum rules.

Everyone else - please ignore now; I think GOKUSSJ3 has already been told all the relevant facts.

It is pretty shocking to read a post by knreed which informed that BOINC was 3x more efficient at pulling unique jobs thru the system than UD agent can.

THE UNSAID: Coldly calculating, if some get lost in the conversion, it still overall markedly improves the net production even though we wont be seeing that in the total CPU data. In Simple Terms: If BOINC's quorum 2 produced 1 net result to go via the assimilator to the scientists, it needs 6 of UD agent to get the same.

On the Migration Meter, we passed several times already the 94% of points generated by BOINC. The hourly credit went up from 65 to 67.4 on a weekly average.

So..........

Convert now and you make 3 times the Difference. Visit the Migration FAQ in the Start Here forum for some basic. We do everything we can to help you past any hobble in the road to BOINCvinity.

Well, it was until that revelation an unknown to me as to how bad it really was..... sure it works, sure we could forget it and still collect points for every second on the wallclock, but that's not the essence of crunching. Had BOINC been more mature and with solid proxy and 'simple' interface one year ago or more, I'm sure WCG would have let the cat out of the bag much earlier and given it the booth.