Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 6203
Posts: 6203   Pages: 621   [ Previous Page | 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3662813 times and has 6202 replies Next Thread
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

@Sgt Joe: What version of BOINC are you running on your Xeon/linux crunchers? If it's a 6xxx version try upgrading to the latest 7xxx version and see if it helps. When I look through my pending verification tasks, especially the ones that are resends, 99% of the errors come from 6xxx clients. I can looked at the logs of others that are pending verification along with mine and tell you which ones will turn invalid. 99% of those are 6xxx clients. Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Dec 1, 2013 6:03:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7851
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

@Sgt Joe: What version of BOINC are you running on your Xeon/linux crunchers? If it's a 6xxx version try upgrading to the latest 7xxx version and see if it helps. When I look through my pending verification tasks, especially the ones that are resends, 99% of the errors come from 6xxx clients. I can looked at the logs of others that are pending verification along with mine and tell you which ones will turn invalid. 99% of those are 6xxx clients. Hope this helps.

Boinc version on the Linux clients is 7.0.27 installed from the repositories. Windows is running 6.2.28 with very little problem. It is only on the one host that was showing a disproportionate number of invalids. Thanks for the info.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Dec 1, 2013 12:58:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

@Sgt Joe: What version of BOINC are you running on your Xeon/linux crunchers? If it's a 6xxx version try upgrading to the latest 7xxx version and see if it helps. When I look through my pending verification tasks, especially the ones that are resends, 99% of the errors come from 6xxx clients. I can looked at the logs of others that are pending verification along with mine and tell you which ones will turn invalid. 99% of those are 6xxx clients. Hope this helps.

Boinc version on the Linux clients is 7.0.27 installed from the repositories. Windows is running 6.2.28 with very little problem. It is only on the one host that was showing a disproportionate number of invalids. Thanks for the info.
Cheers

Might benefit you to upgrade the linux boxes to 7.0.65. 7.0.27 is second to the 6xxx clients having issues on the pending verification tasks that turn invalid that I looked at. Might only be a coincidence but an upgrade can't hurt IMHO and you'll have the added function that lets you use an app_config file to run multiple project on 1 machine by allowing you to dedicate x amount of core to each project. IE you could run half your cores on FAAH and the other half on MCM1 at the same time on the same cruncher. biggrin
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Dec 1, 2013 3:07:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7851
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

@Sgt Joe: What version of BOINC are you running on your Xeon/linux crunchers? If it's a 6xxx version try upgrading to the latest 7xxx version and see if it helps. When I look through my pending verification tasks, especially the ones that are resends, 99% of the errors come from 6xxx clients. I can looked at the logs of others that are pending verification along with mine and tell you which ones will turn invalid. 99% of those are 6xxx clients. Hope this helps.

Boinc version on the Linux clients is 7.0.27 installed from the repositories. Windows is running 6.2.28 with very little problem. It is only on the one host that was showing a disproportionate number of invalids. Thanks for the info.
Cheers

Might benefit you to upgrade the linux boxes to 7.0.65. 7.0.27 is second to the 6xxx clients having issues on the pending verification tasks that turn invalid that I looked at. Might only be a coincidence but an upgrade can't hurt IMHO and you'll have the added function that lets you use an app_config file to run multiple project on 1 machine by allowing you to dedicate x amount of core to each project. IE you could run half your cores on FAAH and the other half on MCM1 at the same time on the same cruncher. biggrin

I will consider it. It has a 1 to 2 day cache of MCM1 plus a few FAAH yet to process so I may let it run out and then try the upgrade. Thanks
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Dec 1, 2013 5:05:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Sep 4, 2006
Post Count: 425
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

Decided to try out the ripple labs gig. Hopefully its not a mistake. That has required me to leave the team for the time being. Gonna miss you guys but hope to be back soon. -Ryan
----------------------------------------

[Dec 2, 2013 5:31:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7851
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

Decided to try out the ripple labs gig. Hopefully its not a mistake. That has required me to leave the team for the time being. Gonna miss you guys but hope to be back soon. -Ryan

Let us know how it goes. Good luck
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Dec 2, 2013 11:33:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

Ripple labs???
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Dec 3, 2013 1:36:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Sep 4, 2006
Post Count: 425
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

Yes, Its a team that has developed a new digital currency kind of like Bitcoin. They announced they would issue users "XRP" (the currency) in exchange for points returned to their WCG team.

The currency can be exchanged for other currencies like dollars or other global currencies. Unfortunately I haven't seen any deposits to my account as of yet. This won't last long if they can't deliver.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 3, 2013 4:47:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jack007
Master Cruncher
CANADA
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
Post Count: 1604
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

Very interesting....
I just left my team as my team captain is busy with life
(TOTALLY UNDERSTANDABLE)
I just wanted to participate in a team challenge,
but for some coins.....
Also since no GPU here yet,
am mining litecoins.
with current run up in price to around 38 bucks,
i can make almost 300 bucks a MONTH at current price and difficulty with a 7950.
will the price go up or down, who knows.
will the difficulty go up yes so each month less and less reward.
but I'll collect em in my wallet, just thought peeps might like to know.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 5, 2013 6:46:53 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Minnesota Crunchers

Yes, Its a team that has developed a new digital currency kind of like Bitcoin. They announced they would issue users "XRP" (the currency) in exchange for points returned to their WCG team.

The currency can be exchanged for other currencies like dollars or other global currencies. Unfortunately I haven't seen any deposits to my account as of yet. This won't last long if they can't deliver.

It took 4 days for anything to show up in my wallet.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Dec 5, 2013 4:07:42 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 6203   Pages: 621   [ Previous Page | 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread