| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 95
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hi Dagorath.
As CAs, we know a little more about this situation. As Team Captain of a partner organisation, I know even more. WCG want to arrange matters so that the logo can be used without any red tape. But that will take a little time, and consultation with lawyers. WCG have made it a priority. After all, David and I hardly ever shut up about the subject - it's not the fault of WCG that they have more urgent priorities. In the meantime, the situation for us is the same as for anyone (including partners). You must get permission for each individual use of the logo, by sending an example by email to WCG. You can't use the logo on merchandise under any circumstances. You won't get permission by asking for a generic go-ahead on the forums. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
You guys have the scoop, no doubt about it. Thanks for sharing it with us and I see now I read the situation entirely wrong. I'll shut up and be patient because there's lots of other work to be done. Logos can be added easily anytime.
I have a question on HTML for you but I'll put it in another post. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Here are some thoughts on structure:
We need some form of heirarchy, or people will never be able to find anything. We want to try to split it by things absolute novices can understand. One of the first questions has to be BOINC/UD so.... What science are WCG doing? - FAAH - HPF1 - HPF2 About the UD agent - stuff that's not written yet - troubleshooting About the BOINC agent - stuff that's up already - troubleshooting What's the difference between BOINC and UD - Choosing the right agent - Migrating to BOINC How's that for a basic structure we can pad out/adjust later? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Ok, this is the web site clinic. Are you seeing patients with HTML problems, Dr. Didactylos? I'm having a problem with frames. Ooooh, that dirty frame word, hope Nelsoc doesn't bleep it out.
I have a navigation bar in Frame A and text in Frame B. I would like to click a link on the nav bar in Frame A and have it load a new html file into Frame B plus load a new html file into Frame A. Is it possible to do that? I've tried the following... <a href="file1.html" target="frame B" href="file2.html" target="frame A" > click here </a> ... which of course is illegal syntax but I'll try anything when I'm desperate. Hope you're not one of those anti-frames HTML doctors. I really like using frames because you can scroll one area of the screen without scrolling it all. But perhaps I've run up against a limitation with frame usage and may have no other choice but to abandon frames? Can this be accomplished with Javascript? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Indeed, that's illegal.
I'm vaguely anti-frame, but only because they are so often misused and the same effects can now be achieved without them. The traditional solution uses Javascript - main document opened by the href as normal, secondary using the onclick event. First, though, let me see if we can't abandon frames, or at the very least cut it down to two (content and navigation). Tell me more about where you're going with this. The main advantage of not using frames is you get the page title in the titlebar, where it does most good. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
How's that for a basic structure we can pad out/adjust later? Your list of essential topics matches mine in almost every way. I agree, we need to get the newcomers on firm ground with simple and thorough explanations of the basic concepts. We want to define new terminology clearly and explain how the basic parts fit together and function as a whole. If we can bring them along that far they'll be able to handle more problems on their own and start to learn independently. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jul 13, 2006 12:28:45 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Okay then, I'll start by working on the navigation. Be warned I'm using an xml editor, so my files will most likely end up valid xhtml. But that's still valid html, so no worries.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Indeed, that's illegal. I'm vaguely anti-frame, but only because they are so often misused and the same effects can now be achieved without them. Glad you're not fanatical on frames. I agree they are often misused and they can really make navigation confusing when used improperly I like to keep the nav bar scroll independent of the main text scroll because when I'm new to a site I can get a picture of the layout faster. As I read along, my mind is forming, testing and accepting/rejecting hypotheses on what's going to be behind the other links. For example, sometimes I run across concepts I need to have explained in more detail but there's no inline link to click for further depth on that concept. Then I glance over at the nav bar to see if there's an appropriate looking link. I might even drill down a few links and see where it goes. Maybe I make a mental note like "ok, after I'm done with this page I'm going to follow those links but first I want to finish this page". That process of flipping ahead for a quick preview and returning is sooo much easier when the nav bar doesn't scroll with the text. Does that make sense to you? Do you read a new site that way too? After I've been to a site a few times I remember the layout. But still, it's annoying having to scroll all the way back up the page to bring the nav bar back into view. It's so much faster and less confusing when the nav bar stays put. The traditional solution uses Javascript - main document opened by the href as normal, secondary using the onclick event. OK. I haven't used Javascript in years but I think that little hint is enough to get me unstuck and moving forward. I've been thinking also that Javascript might make it a lot easier to build a site that is translated into several languages. I think you could have 1 layout, 1 structure in 1 set of files and just overlay different languages onto the same link buttons, text screens, frames, etc. Each language is then an exact mirror of the others with respect to link associations. Change 1 link to drop in a new file and youve changed all the languages at once, less chance for error, easier to maintain, fewer files to keep track of. First, though, let me see if we can't abandon frames, or at the very least cut it down to two (content and navigation). Tell me more about where you're going with this. At the moment I'm using 4 frames ( 2 on top row, 2 on bottom) but have already planned to cut it down to 3 because the top 2 will just be banners, 1 frame is enough for that, the contents won't change and won't scroll off the screen. Maybe scrolling the banners away is actually a good idea because it frees up real estate for more useful purposes, the banners are just decoration anyway, nice to see on the welcome screen but not terribly useful after that. Anyway, that leaves 2 frames on the bottom: 1 narrow one for the nav bar on the left, a wide one on the right for the content, fairly common layout. Here's an easy example of where I want to go. Later, I'll send up the actual pages so you can see the real thing. Right now some of the links are goofed up because I've been experimenting with different solutions to the problem. I'll have to fix the links before I upload. At the welcome screen the nav bar will have, for example, 3 links: planes, trains and cars. You click planes and the text screen loads an intro page on planes and the nav bar loads a page with 4 links: Home, Boeing, Lockheed, deHavilland. Click Boeing and the nav bar loads 6 links: Home, Back, 767, 757, 747, 737. The main advantage of not using frames is you get the page title in the titlebar, where it does most good. That's what they say but my personal experience is I ignore them. Of course that doesn't mean I should ignore titles when building a website. Perhaps other folks pay closer attention to the titles than I do. |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Didactylos, if your last post is a foreboding....., all 18 on page 2 above have now a 5 inch left margin ...could be of course, that yours is the only one correctly formatted......
---------------------------------------- Now on the goal of getting a multilingual wiki... i tried all, but could not get back to the language selection front. Many use little flags somewhere on the screen to switch. BOINCstats is a great example. As for proofreading, can do all but spanish.....could, but then soon an 'ombre could become an 'ombra....and who knows could i be convinced to add traduzione italiano.....i will then have to get it vetted by a lawyer ![]()
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
First up, do you mind going up and editing that broken post - I think the opening quote tag is missing a ].
I've just written a wee bit of javascript to implement an expanding menu. I'll improve the CSS a little and upload it (just for the English site initially). My javascript is tested in Firefox and IE. Anything else may or may not work. However, it will work without javascript. |
||
|
|
|