Oh, look who's talking! It's sad to see toxic people like you on forum related to humanity research! It wasn't me who talked arrogant to anyone, especially not yourself, and u don't have any right to write or talk to me in that bullcarp manner of your's! I would repat it gladly: no one has right to impose something to majority of crunchers just to prove something that actually isn't right or justified! If u think that u are some kind of saint here or policeman, go to your own home and talk to someone there if u have to! Hahah, read again my post and then go back and write something smart, if u can anyway! My post was about people who has dedicated they rigs more to FAH2 and they don't have problems with 24h deadline! It has nothing to do with actually performance of their rigs! I was here donating my time before u and with far less computing power than today! If u are smart enough, and here for actually benefit to science, go and look project output now and period before 7d deadline introduced and explain to us how less work done in one day will actually benefit science? Maybe in your's parallel world or something! First, u are some very frustrated and unhappy person who has bad habit of sticking it's nose where doesn't belong! Go learn some culture of dialog! Second, I wasn't ignorant to anyone! If someone wish to contribute to FAH2, what is the problem to download and crunch it in couple of hours and return results back in 24h? Majority of crunchers must wait for new generations of work just because someone likes to save plenty of work on computer that is turned off? Who is actually ignorant in that case? At the end, I am not only one who thinks that 7d deadline is not good idea for this type of project and, of course, everyone is welcome to crunch it, regardless of rigs they have! It's seems to me that you are here for reasons that u talked to me, bragging with badges on forums, etc. Take some pill against that toxicity of yours! Hope one day we find cure for that kind of people too!

That is what I was talking about! If u can complete task in less than 4 hrs, what is the problem with 24h deadline, except u can't hold stock of work units on computer that u use occasionally! Personally I have pretty old machines for today standards, and not some high performance crunching rigs, like that frustrated TPCBF thinks. One of my laptops is old dual core Athlon 64, and it needs 13,5-14,5 hrs to complete one FAH2 task per core, and you won't find posts about me complaining for 24h deadline because of that. I have even older laptop which can't run FAH2 at all due to lack of RAM, and now I suppose to require from admins and tech that they change memory restrictions of project just because of that? Sure, I have some newer machines besides these, but nothing fancy for today's standards. My point simple was to tell that most of people was fine with 24h deadline. Only problem there can be connectivity, but why someone would downloaded lot of WUs knowing that they won't be done in time when there are projects that have longer deadline? People can contribute to other projects in that case if they have that big problem with 24h deadline. I personally don't have problem with longer deadline, but as test shows, it will cause research to slow down! Yes, FAH2 WUs mostly got downloaded by number of cores you have on PC, plus one or two more since 7d deadline started.

Well the [slap forehead] came pretty quick with the techs on this test, and now well more than 48 hours into this excursion it's established that production dropped to over one-quarter of what it was with the 24 hour deadline, just 3200 from before 11K plus daily. Day 3 noon shows 2148, so if lucky the stream will rise to about 40% of before at the end of this day. The scientists hoped to finish this before a year was over. Surely they can wait another year, or?

ot\

Funny what one can do with the forum filters. Only 8 of 46, which is 17% of the posts in this thread came from you so far.

https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg...=0&sort=1&rows=20

/ot

It's always been my feeling that any speed gains FAHB gets by using a 1 day deadline are stolen from other projects. It's only because of the lack of other work on other WCG projects that I continue to support FAHB with a 1 day deadline at all.