Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 126
Posts: 126   Pages: 13   [ Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 31206 times and has 125 replies Next Thread
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1684
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

Hi Ralf,
you have to verify your host profiles. It is not normal that you receive WUs from non-selected projects even if you do not opt for "If there is no work available for the project(s) I have selected above, please send me work from another project."
Are you sure that your hosts use the device profile they are supposed to use?
To be sure, you should overwrite the local device configuration by reloading the device profile from WCG.
Cheers,
Yves
----------------------------------------
[Apr 10, 2018 1:10:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
TPCBF
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 2, 2011
Post Count: 2173
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

Hi Ralf,
you have to verify your host profiles. It is not normal that you receive WUs from non-selected projects even if you do not opt for "If there is no work available for the project(s) I have selected above, please send me work from another project."
Are you sure that your hosts use the device profile they are supposed to use?
To be sure, you should overwrite the local device configuration by reloading the device profile from WCG.
Cheers,
Yves
Well, of course I have selected the option to get work from other projects when none if available for the selected projects.
As I mentioned many times before, I have neither time nor interest in micro-manage settings. And that has worked just fine with all the standard settings, specially when there were issues with one or the other project in the past (just consider how many hosts would sit idle if you would select HST only!).
It's just since the switch from the fairly short running to the extremely long running WUs in OET, that this has become such a problem...

What would help in such a situation would be if there was an option in the profile settings not only to explicitly select but also to explicitly EXCLUDE a certain project from the list of WUs being provided...

Ralf
[Apr 10, 2018 7:48:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7846
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

What would help in such a situation would be if there was an option in the profile settings not only to explicitly select but also to explicitly EXCLUDE a certain project from the list of WUs being provided...

I believe this has been requested before and is possibly on the list of things to get done when there is time.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Apr 10, 2018 10:02:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Procyon Lotor One
Cruncher
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Post Count: 16
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

OET1_ 0000642_ xSDGP-OM_ rig_ 0636_ 0-- ET1331G-03W Valid 4/15/2018 1:30 4/15/2018 15:36 12.72 / 13.08 39.4 / 39.4
OET1_ 0000619_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 29659_ 0-- ET1331G-03W Valid 4/15/2018 1:30 4/15/2018 18:01 15.11 / 15.49 39.4 / 39.4
OET1_ 0000642_ xSDGP-OM_ rig_ 0708_ 0-- ET1331G-03W Valid 4/15/2018 1:30 4/15/2018 16:43 13.84 / 14.20 39.4 / 39.4


I had really hoped that the WUs were stabilized a bit better now as they come in with a fairly good estimate. But here is a computer I just put back into service and what happens - every WU so far is blessed with a 39.4. Talk about bad luck. I will need to take it back offline if the numbers on it don't pick up.


[Apr 15, 2018 6:20:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Procyon Lotor One
Cruncher
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Post Count: 16
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

So, does anyone have any experience with WUs that are estimated at 32 hours? Are these automatically going to give me 39.4 credits?

I just have seven WUs for now that are estimated over 24 hours, but we know the estimates sometimes run low...
[Apr 20, 2018 7:41:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
TPCBF
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 2, 2011
Post Count: 2173
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

So, does anyone have any experience with WUs that are estimated at 32 hours? Are these automatically going to give me 39.4 credits?
Some might, some don't. It doesn't seem to be AS BAD as it was the other week, but I still see some WUs occasionally that get that default "credit"...
I just have seven WUs for now that are estimated over 24 hours, but we know the estimates sometimes run low...
Yes, I have a lot of them that definitely run +24h, with mixed results:
OET1_ 0000642_ xSDGP-OM_ rig_ 62297_ 0-- 	DESKTOP-VM717KK 	Valid 	4/14/18 07:14:08 	4/20/18 15:34:57 	48.73 / 48.73 	39.4 / 184.6
OET1_ 0000618_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 66536_ 0-- MVVH02 Valid 4/15/18 18:52:05 4/19/18 04:19:35 39.23 / 39.23 368.8 / 368.8
OET1_ 0000616_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 74864_ 0-- ToshibaLatop Valid 4/15/18 21:35:19 4/19/18 11:49:03 36.60 / 36.60 335.5 / 373.3
OET1_ 0000619_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 44152_ 0-- DESKTOP-VM717KK Valid 4/14/18 20:08:32 4/20/18 18:20:43 35.83 / 35.83 357.0 / 295.0
OET1_ 0000642_ xSDGP-OM_ rig_ 90077_ 1-- MVVH13 Valid 4/14/18 08:28:24 4/20/18 00:25:21 35.11 / 35.11 39.4 / 39.4
OET1_ 0000618_ xEBGP-OM_ rig_ 66225_ 1-- FrontdeskRight Valid 4/15/18 18:36:49 4/19/18 08:03:50 32.79 / 32.79 325.9 / 302.3

Ralf
[Apr 21, 2018 5:40:00 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Procyon Lotor One
Cruncher
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Post Count: 16
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

I was thinking of aborting these double length WUs in favor of getting the lower estimated ones, but they are all I am getting now. I predict this is going to turn out bad...

To your point, it doesn't feel as bad now as the other week. But that was before these big WUs showed up for me. Here at the final days it is just making me more nervous about reaching my 20 year goal.
[Apr 21, 2018 6:12:35 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher
New Zealand
Joined: Nov 4, 2005
Post Count: 1326
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

I was thinking of aborting these double length WUs in favor of getting the lower estimated ones, but they are all I am getting now. I predict this is going to turn out bad...

To your point, it doesn't feel as bad now as the other week. But that was before these big WUs showed up for me. Here at the final days it is just making me more nervous about reaching my 20 year goal.

There is a 37% of the project remaining so I think you will be okay in terms of run-time. How many days do you average per calendar day?
----------------------------------------

[Apr 21, 2018 7:09:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1684
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

After a couple of week with OM WU's, the credit discrepancy between OM and "classical" WUs seems to be now at about 10%, including some crazy credits (too low or too high).
Cheers,
Yves
----------------------------------------
[Apr 21, 2018 8:29:43 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Brummig
Cruncher
Joined: Sep 19, 2016
Post Count: 26
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Starting OET1 "OM" type workunits

I keep getting OET tasks that grossly underestimate the time to completion, but which are assigned an abnormally short deadline because they are bouncing from host to host, uncompleted by the deadline. Like FAH2, it's another case of more haste, less speed. Give hosts adequate time to complete them, and they will complete faster than if they just keep bouncing from host to host. If OET doesn't start playing nicely very soon, I'll be dropping it, just like I dropped FAH2. Losing reliable hosts is not a way to get the job done on time.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Brummig at Apr 21, 2018 1:42:40 PM]
[Apr 21, 2018 1:41:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 126   Pages: 13   [ Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread