| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Hardware Chat Room
Thread: Ryzen performance |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 66
|
|
| Author |
|
|
geoff.andreychuk
Cruncher Joined: Nov 2, 2015 Post Count: 42 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
@duanebong
----------------------------------------I know the exact speed my ram is running at, I know that after bios updates it says that its at 3200MHz at least according to CPU-Z  |
||
|
|
geoff.andreychuk
Cruncher Joined: Nov 2, 2015 Post Count: 42 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
@enels
----------------------------------------running the 1700 @ 3.2GHz its drawing around 120W, if you wanted to under-clock I would wait until there are more updates available (especially bios) to work out some of the bugs that are still around |
||
|
|
fuzzydice555
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Mar 25, 2015 Post Count: 89 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
My results on windows 10 with a gtx 1060, 1 SSD and 1 HDD:
----------------------------------------r7 1700 3.2GHz 120 W power at the wall 10539 BOINC PPD / 73773 WCG points/day 87,83 P/W efficiency Comparing VietOZ and my results, running Linux adds +30% points or +30% efficiency. With underclocking and undervolting, efficiency should be very close to top of the line Xeon v4 cpus... as we should see with the upcoming Naples chips. Also, the 1700 may be a 65W chip on paper, it consumes much more power on full blast. The i7 6700 is a 65W chip and it did 31W less in the same configuration. The r7 1700 is 10% more efficient than the i7 6700 though, which is a minor miracle.  [Edit 1 times, last edit by fuzzydice555 at Mar 23, 2017 10:09:16 PM] |
||
|
|
geoff.andreychuk
Cruncher Joined: Nov 2, 2015 Post Count: 42 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
@duanebong, actually although CPU-Z says that my memory is running @3200, bios is still saying that its running at 2133. I tried to set the memory speed in bios to 3200 but it would not post. So after setting the speed back to auto, its posting and CPU-Z is still saying that its at 3200, so I dont know exactly what speed its running at
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Jozef J
Cruncher Joined: Sep 24, 2012 Post Count: 45 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
viet oz usa war can you setup linux and my 7970 amd gf card? on some linux distro ..(7970 milkyway )
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Jozef J
Cruncher Joined: Sep 24, 2012 Post Count: 45 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I noticed the power draw went up about 3W when I first installed ubuntu 17.04. But after a couple of updates it is dead lock at 165W, which is the same with W10 pro.
----------------------------------------I'm also using kernel 4.10. gpu.? [Edit 2 times, last edit by Jozef J at Mar 25, 2017 3:56:15 AM] |
||
|
|
duanebong
Advanced Cruncher Singapore Joined: Apr 25, 2009 Post Count: 134 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I've just built a Ryzen rig yesterday, here's the performance of a few WUs from running it overnight. Below is also the figures I got from a Sandybridge 2600K that the Ryzen is replacing. All work units are from the SCC project.
----------------------------------------Ryzen 1700 @ 3.2GHz running 15 threads SCC WU: 1.11hrs CPU time - credit 54.7/35.8 claimed/granted SCC WU: 0.77hrs CPU time - credit 38.1/24.3 claimed/granted SCC WU: 1.17hrs CPU time - credit 35.3/27.1 claimed/granted SCC WU: 0.78hrs CPU time - credit 40.0/43.2 claimed/granted Sandybridge 2600K @ Stock running 8 threads SCC WU: 3.60hrs CPU time - credit 35.3/59.2 claimed/granted SCC WU: 4.70hrs CPU time - credit 46.3/51.6 claimed/granted SCC WU: 5.27hrs CPU time - credit 51.8/89.5 claimed/granted SCC WU: 3.05hrs CPU time - credit 30.1/63.0 claimed/granted PC specifications CPU: Ryzen 1700 (non-X) @ 3.2GHz / 1.00V Motherboard: Asus X370-Pro BIOS 0511 Memory: Corsair LED 2x8GB 3200MHz @ 2933MHz / 1.35V Heatsink: AMD Wraith Spire Graphics: Asus GTX960 STRIX OC OS: Windows 10 Creator's Update Build 15063 The system wouldn't POST at all if I set the memory at 3200MHz. According to SIV64X these Corsairs are rank 1 modules, so it's a bit disappointing, will probably need to wait for an updated BIOS based on the recently released AGESA. However, the memory is rock solid on Prime95 at 2933MHz CL16. Extra note: The stock cooler is pretty silent at 3.2GHz / 1.00V. It gets a lot noisier by the time the clockspeed hits 3.5GHz / 1.1V. If you intend to get a 1700X or 1800X, I suspect you'll also need much better cooling (i.e. dual 120mm watercooler) to cope with the heat from running all 16 threads at 4.0GHz / 1.45V.  [Edit 2 times, last edit by duanebong at Mar 25, 2017 9:38:47 AM] |
||
|
|
hunter1978
Advanced Cruncher United States Joined: Apr 24, 2010 Post Count: 111 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Impressive performance with the dramatically shorter work units on the Ryzen compared to your older cpu's. Looks like it was well worth it.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7849 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.2GHz running 15 threads SCC WU: 1.11hrs CPU time - credit 54.7/35.8 claimed/granted SCC WU: 0.77hrs CPU time - credit 38.1/24.3 claimed/granted SCC WU: 1.17hrs CPU time - credit 35.3/27.1 claimed/granted SCC WU: 0.78hrs CPU time - credit 40.0/43.2 claimed/granted Sandybridge 2600K @ Stock running 8 threads SCC WU: 3.60hrs CPU time - credit 35.3/59.2 claimed/granted SCC WU: 4.70hrs CPU time - credit 46.3/51.6 claimed/granted SCC WU: 5.27hrs CPU time - credit 51.8/89.5 claimed/granted SCC WU: 3.05hrs CPU time - credit 30.1/63.0 claimed/granted I am not sure of your time frame, but you may be comparing apples to oranges here. SCC went through a period when the work units were longer and just recently in the last three or so days started units which were much shorter. Comparing on the same system, a xeon L5420, the longer units were running 3 to 4 hours and giving from 15 to 30 BOINC points per hour. On the shorter units running from 0.5 hours to 1.5 hours the same system was producing 50 to 66 BOINC points per hour. Unless you are testing homogenous work units I would take your results with a grain of salt. Nonetheless, I wish I had one of those Ryzen machines. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
duanebong
Advanced Cruncher Singapore Joined: Apr 25, 2009 Post Count: 134 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
@Sgt.Joe... You're right, they're SCC but the type of WU has changed a few days ago. Unfortunately I scavanged the SSD and power supply from the Sandybridge to reuse on the Ryzen and can't run both at the same time. I also have a 4770K, but it's been running HSTB lately and hasn't returned the new SCC work units. Will post again when I see it results for those, or perhaps someone else can compare against his own figures.
----------------------------------------In the mean time, I hope by scaling by the credits granted it would be possible to get a feel for the performance difference. If using the granted credits, the Ryzen gets 35.6 credits per hour vs 16.3 credits per hour for the 2600K. Additionally, it's crunching 15 of them in parallel, whereas the 2600K was crunching only 8. Sure, it's not apples to apples, and the sample size is also very small. But we're looking at 3-4x the total output, which even if it's an overestimate is still a huge gain. [Edit 1 times, last edit by duanebong at Mar 25, 2017 1:09:25 PM] |
||
|
|
|