Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 71
Posts: 71   Pages: 8   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 11952 times and has 70 replies Next Thread
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7854
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

Here are the results for the same machine doing FAHV Vina units. They appear to be averaging about 43 BOINC pts/hour, even better than the SN2S Vina units.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/SCeO99K.jpg[/IMG]
I'll bet the Beast 2 is fully capable of over 100 BOINC pts/hour per core.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Aug 25, 2013 4:05:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Movieman
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Sep 9, 2006
Post Count: 1042
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

Here are the results for the same machine doing FAHV Vina units. They appear to be averaging about 43 BOINC pts/hour, even better than the SN2S Vina units.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/SCeO99K.jpg[/IMG]
I'll bet the Beast 2 is fully capable of over 100 BOINC pts/hour per core.
Cheers

WOW! Your beating the crap out of me! LOLOL
I'm still on the FAAH Vina WU, had a pile of them so need to do them first but it appears something is wrong on my end or your 5410's are the golden system for this project..Might be my memory as that is only at 1400 for now or maybe HT is having a bad effect or windows itself?? BUT the best thing from this conversation is you have me looking for a problem I didn't know was there and for that you have my thanks!
----------------------------------------

[Aug 25, 2013 5:45:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7854
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

Here are the results for the same machine doing FAHV Vina units. They appear to be averaging about 43 BOINC pts/hour, even better than the SN2S Vina units.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/SCeO99K.jpg[/IMG]
I'll bet the Beast 2 is fully capable of over 100 BOINC pts/hour per core.
Cheers

WOW! Your beating the crap out of me! LOLOL
I'm still on the FAAH Vina WU, had a pile of them so need to do them first but it appears something is wrong on my end or your 5410's are the golden system for this project..Might be my memory as that is only at 1400 for now or maybe HT is having a bad effect or windows itself?? BUT the best thing from this conversation is you have me looking for a problem I didn't know was there and for that you have my thanks!

You're welcome
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Aug 25, 2013 6:03:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
OldChap
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Jun 5, 2009
Post Count: 978
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

Wow, those are some great points per hour. What do the cpu benchmarks look like for that rig Joe?

I get this with 2 x 8c/16t 26xx's @2.4 on linux mint and benchmarks of 2281/8614

http://www.lakecityquietpills.com/photo/multi.../66532585974553879452.png
----------------------------------------

[Aug 25, 2013 10:33:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Movieman
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Sep 9, 2006
Post Count: 1042
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

Almost 130,000 WCG points toiday showing 38 out of a potential 40 "days" work, thats 135,000 if you extrapolate to the full 40..
Still way down if you look at Sgt Joe's numbers but in the ball park with OId Chaps.. HMMMMMM..
----------------------------------------

[Aug 26, 2013 12:37:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7854
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

Here are the benchmarks for the E5410's
Sun 25 Aug 2013 07:42:15 PM CDT | | 2342 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
Sun 25 Aug 2013 07:42:15 PM CDT | | 12403 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Aug 26, 2013 12:46:19 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

@Movieman
Still way down if you look at Sgt Joe's numbers .. HMMMMMM..
It's difficult to search the forum for this, but is it now the case that the server influences the points you get? Could it be that, for a new fast machine, the points per hour will increase gradually to the "correct" figure?
[Aug 26, 2013 10:18:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Movieman
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Sep 9, 2006
Post Count: 1042
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

@Movieman
Still way down if you look at Sgt Joe's numbers .. HMMMMMM..
It's difficult to search the forum for this, but is it now the case that the server influences the points you get? Could it be that, for a new fast machine, the points per hour will increase gradually to the "correct" figure?

It's possible..I've been checking some numbers and in other benchmarks this shows just about the same computational power as the overclocked 8 core SB E5-2687W cpu's I had in this same system before these even though these are at 3047Mhz vs the SB chips being at 3612MHz so the output per day of app 130,000WCG PPD makes sense from that perspective.
The advantage to using these chips vs the SB chips if that is the case is all in the much lower heat dump and lower electrical draw..
So even if not an increase in gross output it is a win win because of those two factors..
BUT I still would've liked to see some monster numbers! LOL
Maybe when the new chips show up in a week or so.
I have a pair of E5-2687W V2's coming. Still not sure if those ar 8 or 10 cores but speed is listed as 3400/3700 on turbo and those may go to app 3922 in this board..8 core makes common sense but who knows for sure yet what they are.. laughing
THE chips I'd like to really test are the 12 core E5-2697 V2's..2700/3000 on turbo and I think I could get them up to 3150 on this system BUT they are very tough to find.
----------------------------------------

[Aug 26, 2013 12:53:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Movieman
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Sep 9, 2006
Post Count: 1042
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

Now here's one to make you all smile.
I happened to be checking the BOINC manager log file and saw this:
8/26/2013 12:07:50 PM | World Community Grid | Reporting 2 completed tasks
8/26/2013 12:07:50 PM | World Community Grid | Requesting new tasks for CPU
8/26/2013 12:07:53 PM | World Community Grid | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
8/26/2013 12:07:53 PM | World Community Grid | No tasks sent
8/26/2013 12:07:53 PM | World Community Grid | No tasks are available for the applications you have selected.
8/26/2013 12:07:53 PM | World Community Grid | This computer has finished a daily quota of 5 tasks

Now since this machine is essentially doing one WU every 2.3 minutes I think it just may do more than FIVE in a day! laughing
----------------------------------------

[Aug 26, 2013 4:14:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: An interesting month

This computer has finished a daily quota of 5 tasks
I've just hit that issue on my slower machine, immediately after I had accidentally filled the cache with 30 new SN2S tasks (the maximum in one download request). That single-core machine has been completing about 2 tasks per day (CEP2 @ 12 hours each)! In my case it says it's a daily quota of 7 tasks tongue. Could you have hit the absolute daily maximum per machine, and it's the log message that is misleading (polite way of saying "wrong")?
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Aug 26, 2013 4:31:46 PM]
[Aug 26, 2013 4:29:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 71   Pages: 8   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread