| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: Beta test for Say No to Schistosoma (May 24, 2012) Issues Thread |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 88
|
|
| Author |
|
|
andreic
Advanced Cruncher Canada Joined: Nov 19, 2004 Post Count: 100 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I've gotten 27 so far. They are running on various Linux and MacOS versions. I've been killing and restarting them and I just can't get them to fail.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
No problems so far here either, on winxp32 or snow leopard
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I restarted my i7 (8 threads) laptop with 2 betas. Both resumed from the last checkpoint as expected. Win7 64-bit, BOINC 6.10.58 64-bit.
|
||
|
|
Warped@RSA
Senior Cruncher South Africa Joined: Jan 15, 2006 Post Count: 419 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
No failures here. Rebooted with Win XP 32-bit. Picked up at checkpoints.
----------------------------------------Looks good.
Dave
 |
||
|
|
Bugg
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 19, 2006 Post Count: 271 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I was at work the entire time this beta test happened. Thus I was unable to do the shutdown, etc, and all 4 work units I received were returned with ERROR status:
----------------------------------------Result Name: BETA_ SN2S_ smp005470_ 0000001_ 0093_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.12.34</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741790 (0xc0000022) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> ]]> Result Name: BETA_ SN2S_ smp005470_ 0000001_ 0033_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.12.34</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741790 (0xc0000022) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> ]]> Result Name: BETA_ SN2S_ smp005470_ 0000001_ 0040_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.12.34</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741790 (0xc0000022) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> ]]> Result Name: BETA_ SN2S_ smp005470_ 0000001_ 0322_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.12.34</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741790 (0xc0000022) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> ]]> I run Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit.  i5-12600K (3.7GHz), 32GB DDR5, Win11 64bit Home |
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
Picked up a repair unit that the original wingman errored as <core_client_version>6.12.42</core_client_version>
----------------------------------------<![CDATA[ <message> couldn't start Can't write init file: -108: -108 </message> ]]> It's running just fine for me so far.  Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
So far so good with the ones I got.
Suspend / Resume , Shutdown / Restart , no problems. One thing I did notice... Is it just my imagination or are these using more RAM than the regular production ones did ? Maybe it is the CFSW ones I was running previously didn't let go of the memory or else these are using more than before. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Found 8 in queue this morning, started 3 and let them run half an hour. Did an orderly OS shutdown, i.e. let BOINC [7.0.28 testing release], do the OS shutdown detection. Power up resumed where they left off, at last checkpoints. Since [charged] batteries were included, also held the power-switch for 4 seconds to shut down cold. Not anticipating for that to cause task fail any more than other sciences statistically would. Given that before never had the issue on this device for SN2S, chances were low, unless the new code introduced something new.
----------------------------------------Good thinking BTW of the crew to do this test on SN2S right when their production is having an intermission. Hopefully Inforium will pull it off soon to allow the feeder to be put back on, in higher gear, as no test is as good as full production. --//-- Edit: holding the other 5 Beta WU's in case something odd/new is reported by a tester, to see if this can me reproduced on this W7-64 flattop. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 25, 2012 6:00:32 AM] |
||
|
|
astroWX
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Sep 1, 2007 Post Count: 56 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Only oddity noticed, so far --> at 1h/58m CPU time each, progress for three tasks on the same box is 29.5%, 37.0%, 44.7%. Consistency! (Q6600 in Vista_x64, 32-bit boinc)
Running a bit slower on a faster machine (Q9300 in Vista_x64, 32-bit boinc). Squirrelly 'CPU vs. %complete' numbers on Q9550 in W7_x64, 32-bit boinc, but percentages not as wildly scattered as on the Q6600. |
||
|
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1313 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
After the cat 'accidentally' pushed several seconds on the power button of this laptop:
----------------------------------------25-mei 08:36:40 Starting BOINC client version 7.0.25 for windows_intelx86 25-mei 08:36:40 Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1500MHz [Family 6 Model 9 Stepping 5] 25-mei 08:36:40 OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Home x86 Edition, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) 25-mei 08:36:40 Memory: 958.48 MB physical, 2.26 GB virtual 25-mei 08:36:40 Disk: 18.62 GB total, 7.83 GB free World Community Grid 25-mei 08:36:40 URL http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/; Computer ID 668066; resource share 200 World Community Grid 25-mei 08:36:40 General prefs: from World Community Grid (last modified 23-Apr-2012 09:15:25) World Community Grid 25-mei 08:36:40 Host location: none World Community Grid 25-mei 08:36:40 General prefs: using your defaults 25-mei 08:37:17 Benchmark results: 25-mei 08:37:17 Number of CPUs: 1 25-mei 08:37:17 1399 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 25-mei 08:37:17 2839 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU World Community Grid 25-mei 08:37:18 Restarting task BETA_SN2S_smp005470_0000009_0472_1 using beta14 version 620 in slot 0 Running fine from last checkpoint after restart and I will check whether it will validate fine too. Edit: On another 'remote' machine I've running 8. I'm not able to shutdown that machine. 2 'ABE' SN2S have less checkpoints and as the old WX frog said: With ~equal runtime so far progress from 21% to 39% with all 8 running concurrently.  [Edit 1 times, last edit by Crystal Pellet at May 25, 2012 6:57:11 AM] |
||
|
|
|