Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 88
Posts: 88   Pages: 9   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 434180 times and has 87 replies Next Thread
Platoon
Advanced Cruncher
Russia
Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Post Count: 62
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

Sekerob, thank you.
You're right - have not read carefully that post.

Anyway I wanted to buy a new ATI card, I think the time has come :)
Any info about compatibility of newest ATI cards? (I mean 79xx and 78xx)
----------------------------------------
" forever forge ahead and keep the dream in sight!"

[Mar 13, 2012 6:20:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Platoon
Advanced Cruncher
Russia
Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Post Count: 62
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

SekeRob, thank you.
You're right - have not read carefully that post.

Anyway I wanted to buy a new ATI card, I think the time has come :)
Any info about compatibility of newest ATI cards? (I mean 79xx and 78xx)
----------------------------------------
" forever forge ahead and keep the dream in sight!"

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Platoon at Mar 13, 2012 6:22:52 PM]
[Mar 13, 2012 6:21:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

Well, the beta runs on 7750 (mine) and 7970 (teammate's), so I guess it's working. Same like everyone, some valids, some "too late's" (o.O), some inconclusive results..
[Mar 13, 2012 6:23:50 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

Can you post the time completed from the 7970? Would like to compare it to my 6950.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Mar 14, 2012 12:48:32 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
blackheeler [TeaM]
Cruncher
Joined: Mar 13, 2012
Post Count: 19
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta


EDIT: I looked in BOINCTasks History and all three seemed to have run in 5 minutes clock (CPU & GPU) and used 0.79 of CPU and 1 GPU. Still too early to tell anything.
EDIT 2: On the CPU test side, I am getting a consistant 26 BOINC credits for 1.1 CPU hours (i7 970). That seems to me to be an equitible spread of BOINC credits between a CPU job and a GPU job. cool


Credit spread may be ok but how will time allocated to badges work?
The two GPU WU's I completed today finished in 0.02 hrs CPU TIME and an unknown clock time (lets assume 5 mins as per DM). This would give me 288 GPU WU's completed in a day but only 288 x 0.02 hrs towards badge recognition crying

If I ran CPU WU's only I would run pretty close to 1:1 ratio of CPU time to clock time and thus have virtually a full days work locked up in pending jail tongue

Or am I missing something here??

PS Hi DM biggrin
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by blackheeler [TeaM] at Mar 14, 2012 1:43:02 PM]
[Mar 14, 2012 1:38:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

Yes, you're missing something. The Elapsed time is supposed to be the measured time for statistics, so if it took 6 minutes from start to finish, then 6 minutes gets credited. Unfortunately we can't say "same as at other grids" as other grids don't keep time beyond where the credit [points] has been computed. In that WCG is pretty unique. This is assuming an unthrottled host... one that is set to use 100% CPU (aka GPU time).

--//--
[Mar 14, 2012 1:56:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Hypernova
Master Cruncher
Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland
Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Post Count: 1908
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

I configured six of my machines to receive GPU workunits.
Five machines use the Nvidia GTX580 and one has a GTX480. All with the latest 296 series driver. These are all Cuda 2.0 or more, so they should be ok.
Let's see if I can grab now a few of these Beta GPU. For the moment I got 30 WUs but of the CPU type. The were finished in about 1hr and 15 minutes. It would be interesting to see the difference.
WCG please send a few of them smile thanks.
----------------------------------------

[Mar 14, 2012 2:07:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

Don't forget to confirm you've got the OpenCL part installed. The GPU-Z tool will confirm, bottom left. Don't think that at this performance we'll ever going to see a CUDA specific GPU project at WCG.

--//--
[Mar 14, 2012 2:11:33 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

SekeRob,

From my limited computer background, I get the impression that AMD/ATI is "better" as single FPU projects (basic numbers), while NVIDIA is more adept for double FPU projects, which are more complex. So for "basic" (not being used negatively) projects, yes AMD/ATI is better (PrimeGrid, Bitcoin are my two best examples.)

While NVIDIA's seem to be the prefered brand by scientists for molecular research and other applications that require more oomph.

Like I said, I really don't know a lot about the differences in programming/design, but I do know that even though I read a lot about how good AMD/ATI's cards are, it seems to me that many new games, Grid apps, and supercomputers being built revolve are NVIDIA's design for some reason. If someone could enlighten me on this I would appreciate it.

Crunching on......
[Mar 14, 2012 2:21:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lead time for GPU beta

I say this of not expecting CUDA as it is going to exclude a very big portion of the volunteer community if that criteria was set... which is why WCG went for OpenCL, and it so happens that HCC is an integer computing science. Who knows what the future will bring. Read last week that NVidia joined an open source Linux consortium, so who knows will CUDA become less proprietary.

--//--

edit: Here's the link to the mentioned NVidia joining http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/nvidia-now-a-member-of-the-linux-foundation/
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 14, 2012 4:14:45 PM]
[Mar 14, 2012 3:37:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 88   Pages: 9   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread