| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Support
Forum: BOINC Agent Support
Thread: Server Software Upgrade issues, Mar-6-2012 ~14:30 UTC - 21:00 UTC |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 177
|
|
| Author |
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Rob - you will find them labelled 'in-progress' on the result page. The next time your client connects it should be sent them again. A bad update command was run that put the results into a bad state.
|
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
We are not turning on validation yet. There are some odd cpu time and claimed credit values being reported/generated. We need to resolve that first before we turn those on.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
At a loss how after the acknowledges were logged [the feedback from the server to the client], how this worked, but anyhow, they had gone from the tasks view in the manager, yet here they went again:
----------------------------------------262 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:05:57 update requested by user 263 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:01 [sched_op] Starting scheduler request 264 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:01 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 265 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:01 Requesting new tasks for CPU 266 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:01 [sched_op] CPU work request: 329902.58 seconds; 0.00 devices 267 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Scheduler request completed: got 12 new tasks 268 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 [sched_op] Server version 700 269 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000011_1076_1 270 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000011_0022_1 271 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000011_0174_0 272 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000015_0725_1 273 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000015_0770_0 274 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000015_0767_1 275 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000015_0084_0 276 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000015_0123_1 277 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000015_0601_1 278 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000015_0664_0 279 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000018_0068_1 280 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Resent lost task SN2S_AAB88508_0000026_0360_0 281 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 Project requested delay of 11 seconds 282 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 [sched_op] estimated total CPU task duration: 269050 seconds 283 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 [sched_op] Deferring communication for 11 sec 284 World Community Grid 7-3-2012 2:06:06 [sched_op] Reason: requested by project Guess to see them in the morning... part 2 of shut eye now. (wonder if this is a bad state in the client 7.0.20 alpha logging [premature removal from view]) --//-- [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 7, 2012 1:16:04 AM] |
||
|
|
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Post Count: 1343 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I had a few machines do it too Sek, so it wasn't just a client version. ( or at least I don't believe.) I saw it happen on 6.10.60 and 6.12.34. While the feeder was temporarily back up (yes I had about 4 machines get work) I saw this happen. I might have had a machine or two that are borged also get work, but I think that really is irrelevant.
----------------------------------------    [Edit 1 times, last edit by Coleslaw at Mar 7, 2012 1:25:59 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Both machines I've set up on my "school" profile ("Help Conquer Cancer" and "If my computer can process work on my graphics card..." checked) are now crunching WUs from my "work" profile (Say No to Schistosoma only)
----------------------------------------EDIT: 1 is 6.10.60, 2 is 6.10.58 [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 7, 2012 1:39:05 AM] |
||
|
|
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Post Count: 1343 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Am I missing something? Apparently there is no way to turn off CPU processing and accept only GPU processing as is done with other projects like Einstein and Milkyway GPU processing.  Why would you want to do that?  I'll look at putting that option in. The <no_cpu> tag exists on the BOINC side, we just need enable via our website and test. Kevin...could you also make it where you could choose which projects use GPU's? Other projects do this and if WCG takes on GPU projects in the future, some may want to support one project but not another. I know HCC will be first to get GPU, but I have a feeling we will see others in the future. Right now the option looks to be all or nothing. The My Projects/Device Profiles user-interfaces need a good going over. As the options get more complex (as if they aren't already complex) we will take a look how to streamline the interface and make it more flexible AND make it not intimidating to someone who has no idea what a GPU is. Kevin, just so I'm clear...if I check to receive GPU work but don't have HCC selected, will I still get the GPU work or will I need to also select HCC? I would think that I could elect out of CPU work by not having it checked and still get GPU, but wanted to make sure that is how WCG actually has it set up in the coding. |
||
|
|
TPCBF
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 2, 2011 Post Count: 1960 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Both machines I've set up on my "school" profile ("Help Conquer Cancer" and "If my computer can process work on my graphics card..." checked) are now crunching WUs from my "work" profile (Say No to Schistosoma only) Yeah, something's screwy here too, had a couple of hosts getting WUs from projects that are not selected in their profiles, one of them getting CEP2, which it isn't supposed to get (will see how this works out, this is my main work PC)... EDIT: 1 is 6.10.60, 2 is 6.10.58 Ralf  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Am I missing something? Apparently there is no way to turn off CPU processing and accept only GPU processing as is done with other projects like Einstein and Milkyway GPU processing. Why would you want to do that? I'll look at putting that option in. The <no_cpu> tag exists on the BOINC side, we just need enable via our website and test. Kevin...could you also make it where you could choose which projects use GPU's? Other projects do this and if WCG takes on GPU projects in the future, some may want to support one project but not another. I know HCC will be first to get GPU, but I have a feeling we will see others in the future. Right now the option looks to be all or nothing. The My Projects/Device Profiles user-interfaces need a good going over. As the options get more complex (as if they aren't already complex) we will take a look how to streamline the interface and make it more flexible AND make it not intimidating to someone who has no idea what a GPU is. Kevin, just so I'm clear...if I check to receive GPU work but don't have HCC selected, will I still get the GPU work or will I need to also select HCC? I would think that I could elect out of CPU work by not having it checked and still get GPU, but wanted to make sure that is how WCG actually has it set up in the coding. My reading of prior responses and the option itself is that you'll only get GPU work for the researches you've selected i.e. no HCC selected, no GPU version pf tasks send, when available. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
knreed, I have 38_SN2S_doneWUs, and enough not-yet-crunched_WUs in my buffer to last for about 2-days. If it would help things, I can defer synch with the servers. Please advice.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Update1: I guess I will have to defer the synch-up with the WCG server. ; ; edit1: 2012.03.07We.0522.utc > Inserted Update1. ; [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 7, 2012 5:22:33 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Rob - you will find them labelled 'in-progress' on the result page. The next time your client connects it should be sent them again. A bad update command was run that put the results into a bad state. Kevin, As what you responded in the "New Problem" thread of Mathilde2006, all tasks after the second resend have remained lost. The second device which did not have this lost/resent sequence have their Pending Validation show up and a few later reports from the device of which those 12 got ''lost'' have also shown up in proper. These were the results from a copy prior to the update: Name DeviceName Status LastUpdate Returned CPUTime Claimed Granted Elapsed PPH ProjectName OSName CPUModel Speed Sent SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000026_ 0360_ 0-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 19:47:00 15-3-2012 18:28:21 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 18:28:21 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000018_ 0068_ 1-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 14:04:00 15-3-2012 13:03:11 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 13:03:11 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000015_ 0664_ 0-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 13:05:00 15-3-2012 11:52:43 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 11:52:43 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000015_ 0601_ 1-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 13:05:00 15-3-2012 11:52:43 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 11:52:43 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000015_ 0084_ 0-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 12:42:00 15-3-2012 11:41:47 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 11:41:47 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000015_ 0767_ 1-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 12:42:00 15-3-2012 11:41:47 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 11:41:47 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000015_ 0770_ 0-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 12:42:00 15-3-2012 11:41:47 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 11:41:47 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000015_ 0725_ 1-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 12:42:00 15-3-2012 11:41:47 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 11:41:47 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000015_ 0123_ 1-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 12:42:00 15-3-2012 11:41:46 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 11:41:46 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000011_ 0174_ 0-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 10:32:00 15-3-2012 9:32:38 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 9:32:38 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000011_ 0022_ 1-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 10:32:00 15-3-2012 9:30:10 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 9:30:10 SN2S_ AAB88508_ 0000011_ 1076_ 1-- 1854592 In Progress 5-3-2012 10:32:00 15-3-2012 9:30:07 SN2S Windows 7 - 64 I7-2670QM 2700 5-3-2012 9:30:07 You've got some bookkeeping to do to resend these for reprocessing. --//-- [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 7, 2012 1:12:24 PM] |
||
|
|
|