| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 246
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello damir1978.
----------------------------------------Reference: damir1978 [May 23, 2012 10:50:18 PM] post Nice link there for the clip, damir1978. In the clip, there was mention of "To all you politicians out there, 90 some percent of us want this to happen. We don't want an oil-based economy and politcal system and all the war..." I struck a similar theme there in my earlier post (except that I used capitalists rather than politicians) under this thread. With the ; ; edit1_2012.05.24Th.2243.utc ; > crossed-out "promise" ; > inserted 'seriously "strange" things' ; [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 24, 2012 10:43:44 PM] |
||
|
|
damir1978
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 16, 2007 Post Count: 397 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
With the promise only coldFusion holds, yes, this area will be interfered with by politicians and their against-the-people's-interests capitalist-funders. ; About interference check this technology: HydroSonic Pump... This was technology from the beginning of the 90' that was hidden from the Public through the same shameless "media silence" that is now applied to ColdFusion II events from today. Look at this video (last minutes of it): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mU3Dj2s7940&feature=relmfu (I advise to see part 1 and 3 from the same interview from 1995) This technology was later (again shamelessly) published as a "NASA" discovery of some kind. ELITE **** of the highest form. http://spinoff.nasa.gov/spinoff2000/ip3.htm Currently, this technology (20 + years old now) is treated like strange novelty that somehow will not be commercialized on grand scale (no federal support there) or improved upon for some very strange and hidden reason. The only "news" about improvement on cavitation effect is from Nanospire: https://nanospireinc.com/ Some history here about Nanospire: http://jinnwe.com/quest.php?id=512 *edited to appropriate forum language - ErikaT ---------------------------------------- [Edit 9 times, last edit by ErikaT at May 24, 2012 11:47:05 AM] |
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I will happily get a 2nd mortgage when Mr Fusion comes out
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
|
astrolabe.
Senior Cruncher Joined: May 9, 2011 Post Count: 496 Status: Offline |
I will happily get a 2nd mortgage when Mr Fusion comes out You might have your 1st mortgage paid off before then. |
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Or a block of apartments and a jet,
----------------------------------------My friend sold his Delorean unfortunately ![]() |
||
|
|
damir1978
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 16, 2007 Post Count: 397 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I will happily get a 2nd mortgage when Mr Fusion comes out You might have your 1st mortgage paid off before then.Not unless he has less than 5 years mortgage. Very interesting Youtube Video about Brillouin Quantum Reactor PHASE I This is the experimental Cold fusion device that it is at the heart of"commercial device Brillouin "HOT TUBE" currently testing at SRI. This proto-cold-fusion device was developed and tested at least 5 years ago: http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/05/video-of-br...hase-1-reactor-in-action/ Also, amazing new video from NASA's Joseph Zawodny, Senior Research Scientist at Langney Research Center entitled Abundant Clean/Green Energy (uploaded on MAY 23rd on YOUTUBE): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42hrCRx1JJY&feature=player_embedded Also, NASA Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center released this today: http://futureinnovation.larc.nasa.gov/view/ar...gy-nuclear-reactions.html |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
No promises, but some seriously "strange" things are going on, which we may be closer to understanding and if we can optimize/engineer such, the world changes. Worldwide, it is worth far more resources than are currently being devoted to this research arena. There is a need to core down and determine "truth" and if useful, the need to engineer and apply. OK, I will have to modify my use of the word "promise" in my post ... Done. -- snip from NASA-article ![]() ; |
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Ok I came to this thread to make a joke,
----------------------------------------but being 4 something in the morning and up, thought what the heck I'd do some video watching. http://joe.zawodny.com/ To sum up what he says, nevermind here's one paragraph... "There have been many attempts to twist the release of this video into NASA's support for LENR or as proof that Rossi's e-cat really works. Many extraordinary claims have been made in 2010. In my scientific opinion, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I find a distinct absence of the latter. So let me be very clear here. While I personally find sufficient demonstration that LENR effects warrant further investigation, I remain skeptical. Furthermore, I am unaware of any clear and convincing demonstrations of any viable commercial device producing useful amounts of net energy." A while ago, I read about Thorium as a possible 'nuclear' reactor. Apparently you can stop the radiation with (drum roll please) Aluminum foil... Finally the Tin Foil Hat people will be happy. I think it would be awesome. People would ask about your ideas for home energy, and you could tell em 'I built a nuclear reactor in my basement' ![]() |
||
|
|
damir1978
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 16, 2007 Post Count: 397 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
HI Jack007.
----------------------------------------The blog page that you quote above was an explanation to the hype created by the video posted in January 2012 by Zawodny himself. He did not anticipated at that time that he will be used by Rossi's fans as "proof" for Rossi's claims and he wanted to distance himself from Rossi for many reasons. However he did not wanted to distance himself form LENR. See bellow the January video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Zgmdo4C1VQ The video bellow is 5 months later and it makes again the case for LENR. This time Zawodny presents more than just bits of theory about LENR. He even show us a serious testing device and reveals that he is working with a company outside NASA (that means commercial interest in LENR). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42hrCRx1JJY&feature=player_embedded Thorium is a VERY good example of clean technology that was hidden from public for the past 50 years with clear scope of going for the dirty (but good for weapons making) uranium and plutonium to be used in nuclear plants. Thorium was supposed to be THE nuclear fission fuel. However, the Powers wanted more than just clean energy. Thorium was discovered in 1828 and NO, the Powers DID NOT think to use it as a replacement for uranium and plutonium JUST NOW. They knew about it from the beginning of commercial nuclear fission plants. But they CHOSE Uranium because they wanted weapons more than they wanted their children's well being. Check here some history on Thorium (the most efficient nuclear fission fuel) and why they chose 50 years ago, Uranium (harder to mine and less efficient fuel): http://realdoctorstu.com/2011/03/24/the-futur...kushima-thorium-reactors/ P.S. By the way... that is HOW WE KNOW that Iran wants bombs and not energy. They did not chose Thorium either for their nuclear fission plants . Got it?---------------------------------------- [Edit 13 times, last edit by damir1978 at May 28, 2012 2:34:10 AM] |
||
|
|
damir1978
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 16, 2007 Post Count: 397 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Some mainstream media is starting to pick up on LENR developments:
----------------------------------------http://www.fcnp.com/commentary/national/11916...-edisonian-approach-.html |
||
|
|
|