You are ignoring and cherry pick so much that you are not worth an answer.

But to set the record straight, it is clear the difference in what I stated and what words you are trying to put in my mouth.
I said:
"They do not use palladium nor silver today for commercial devices"

You said that I said:
"So I guess you were incorrect in stating that the very expensive palladium ($600+/ounce) is no longer used in this research".

There is a clear difference between pure research (where they use everything to better understand the phenomenon) and commercial devices, that are clearly made with business in mind, so they use material based on "cheaper is better" concept. So the statement still stands as it is:
"They do not use palladium nor silver today for commercial devices".

The rest of your ignorance is just that: ignorance and futile denial of facts. Amusing though ... as evidence goes ever against your arguments. You are fighting with too many institutions and scientists, in my opinion. This fight is clearly a joke.

P.S. Your info that Rossi is reluctant to apply for UL certification is either pure ignorance or willful misinformation of WCG members on Rossi statements:
Check here info from almost 3 month ago:

http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/04/rossi-subst...ss-made-on-certification/

"This just posted by Andrea Rossi about the status of safety certification approval from Underwriters Laboratories.

The certification process is going on. By the way, yesterday I spent all the day with the certification engineers and we made substantial progress. In this very moment I am working at my desk to make the paper work they asked me yesterday. It will take all today (Saturday) and tomorrow (Sunday), just to give you an idea of our endeavors on this issue.
Warm Regards,
A.R."

So it takes 2 days to write a report to outline the idea of the status of the certification. No wonder it doesn't work yet. Today is Monday. No report.The point you fail to see, as a result of your cult-llike adherence to the idea of "getting something for nothing" is that there are no facts yet, just theory and words. There have not been any peer-tested machines that work. There is no independent confirmation of the theory. You expound from your omniscient pulpit about my ignorance, but you have nothing to show, nothing to demonstrate. You blast away at me as if I can not possibly be correct since you cannot be possibly wrong. You pad your cell with press releases and promises of status reports not delivered. You are a true prophet and the story is yet to be told of whether your bones will anonymously bleach in the desert sun or you will be revered forever in the Bible of "free energy". Meanwhile I have a life.

Just so we are clear here:Here is what you need to deliver to me by the end of 2012 (nothing I wouldn't expect for any electrical appliance):

1. Certified, tested and warrantied working unit with 30 days money back guarantee
2. Product explosion, Bill of materials and tools needed for at home repair. (You promised that even the ignorant can fix it at home)
3. Inexpensive capital cost as determined by ROI. (actually you promised it would be free)
4. The value of the energy produced, at current market rates, must significantly exceed the input costs. (the actual theory; Drumroll please.......)
5. All raw materials must be readily available from local vendors for retail sale. (You said no palladium, but HomeDepot doesn't carry powdered nickel)
6. Certified approval for connection to my electrical grid if it is going to provide electricity. (I can't just stare at it)
7. Set and forget controls that prevent overheating and/or over/under voltage. (Burning down my house is counter-productive)

Its a tall order for someone who is neither a journalist or a scientist, but you started this. Out of the 7 requirements, my bet is that you and your team of charlatans can deliver ZERO Now I just sit here waiting for the UPS truck. My work is done, unless you start with the press releases again.

the faster than light neutrinos some time ago that were proven wrong had more evidence than this right now

We are still awaiting the scientific peer review of this yet unproved theory.The correct spelling is: Can't bear this thread?The correct grammar is: Please verify your info before posting your argument. Just trying to be helpful.