| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: New Beta Starting 2011/07/22 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Locked Total posts in this thread: 296
|
|
| Author |
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3715 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I am watching an ace80 for the first time...
----------------------------------------1. It is progressing on a 1h20mn basis, 12.5 % for 10 mn elapsed but 2. CPU time is stuck at 17 seconds from the beginning I have checked the CPU time via Properties, BoincTasks (CPU time and Checkpoints fields) and the anomaly is consistent in all places. Later... First checkpoint has been taken now. Elapsed: 14:27 CPU time at last checkpoint: 9:49 CPU time stuck again at 10:06 CPU time since last checkpoint still showing 17 seconds. Puzzled... Edit: OK. After waiting for the 3rd checkpoint it seems that CPU time is accounted correctly at each checkpoint only. No significant loss of CPU time, just a lousy reporting.  ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by JmBoullier at Jul 29, 2011 8:28:42 PM] |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
coolstream, depends on your OS. But they are located in the slots directory in your BOINC Data directory. BOINC data directory is shown at the very beginning of your Messages in the BOINC agent.
On Windows it's probably in C:\ProgramData\BOINC you'll directories with numbers...go into one of those and you'll see stderr.txt -Uplinger |
||
|
|
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Post Count: 1027 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have one running at 60% CPU usage on a Linux box. In "Properties" it just showed:
----------------------------------------CPU time at last checkpoint 16:28 CPU time 16:51 Elapsed time 11:29 Percent complete 12.5% Wierd elapsed time... Edit: just checked the other laptop that's running at 60% CPU usage, and it's also showing shorter elapsed time than CPU time for its beta. The two desktops running at 100% CPU usage have elapsed time larger than CPU time for the betas. Either the efficiency is lower than with other WUs, or CPU time isn't updating very often. I now have 5 Beta-Beta's spread across 4 Linux machines -- 2 moderately fast machines and 2 much slower ones. On all 4, the percent complete is consistently looking as if the total time will be 80 minutes. Edit: that is not holding. The slower machines now are incrementing percent completed more slowly.  [Edit 2 times, last edit by kateiacy at Jul 29, 2011 8:42:16 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The CEP2 vanishing time phenomena revisited? I'll wait till the completion to see how wallclock-elapsed-cpu times relate before doing a first opine.
I'm on Linux Ubuntu 11.04 kernel 2.6.38.10 bld 47. It's a good build... getting almost consistently 99.8-99.9% efficiency for DDDT2 on all 4 cores, sometimes it even shows a round 100% i.e. 99.95% or better... all viewed viaBOINCTasks. --//-- |
||
|
|
mfbabb2
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Feb 18, 2011 Post Count: 361 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Only got 1 Beta (out of 9 cores).  BETA_BETA_ace80_0000000_2478 1.250% after 6 minutes -- est is 8:40:00 remaining. 3.750% -- 00:20:00 -- 08:28:32 (no checkpoint yet) working mem 143.13MB Got another (same machine) -- est 08:43:15. Checkpoints at 45:27 and 36:29 minutes. 12.500% and 13.750%. 01:11:27 and 00:52:09 elapsed. 07:31:19 and 06:44:05 remaining. 4 0f 5 machines have not received any of these Betas.
Murphy
---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by mfbabb2 at Jul 29, 2011 8:43:50 PM] |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
There are still 8000 results waiting to be sent.
Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
mfbabb2
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Feb 18, 2011 Post Count: 361 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Send 'em my way, pls.
----------------------------------------
Murphy
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Ok, just a heads up...on initial inspection, these look good. The science does a calculation against different size ligands. Depending on the size of the ligand determines the runtime per job. We are still working to estimate this properly but as for these workunits they were not estimated. Some of the smaller ligands in the quick runs checkpointed every 40 seconds. Which would come out to be about 6-7 minutes with these workunits. There are however ligands that ran for 10 minutes on the quicker workunits, which would cause them to check point every 1.5 hours. As you can see there is a large difference in speed based on the ligand. In your stderr, you should see pdbqt = # # asdfasdfadf These two numbers represent the size of the ligand. the first number varies so far between 10 and 38. The second number between 0 and 15. the smaller the combination between the two the shorter the job. Thanks, -Uplinger This is what Isee in w windows job, 8 of these jobs packaged. INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. [21:01:01] Number of tasks = 8 [21:01:01] Starting job 0,CPU time is 0.000000. [21:01:01] ZINC04935517.pdbqt size = 31 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta13.target_ace.pdbqt size = 4660 0 [21:52:59] Finished Job #0 cpu time used 3003.718750 [21:52:59] Starting job 1,CPU time is 3003.718750. [21:52:59] ZINC04935517.pdbqt size = 31 5 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta13.target_ace.pdbqt size = 4660 0 97% efficiency, 25% after 2 of these tasks inside the work unit. --//-- |
||
|
|
pirogue
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 685 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
There are still 8000 results waiting to be sent. Thanks, -Uplinger Send 'em my way, pls. No kidding. I'm getting one every 15 minutes or so. At that rate, it's going to take around a week to get all my machines topped off. |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
There are still 8000 results waiting to be sent. Thanks, -Uplinger Thanks uplinger. I have not seen any in an hour. First one completed at 1:34:51 clock & 1:34:43 cpu. (If you can beleive BOINCTasks  )Wu's where GPU's are idle running at 99.60% or above and ones with twin GPU's running at 98.10% or above. Looks very good from my point of view!  |
||
|
|
|