Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 484
Posts: 484   Pages: 49   [ Previous Page | 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 957178 times and has 483 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

Bah! Getting some server aborts. Wish I could get my clients to crunch beta work instead of regular work that is due five days later. crying
[Jul 14, 2011 7:30:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 2977
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

Questar, simple - just set the "Switch between applications every ..." to 7200 (instead of the standard 60). Then, this'll force WU's with a shorter than normal deadline to the top. It works wonders for me...
----------------------------------------

[Jul 14, 2011 7:34:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
TimAndHedy
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jan 27, 2009
Post Count: 267
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

Did anyone else have troubles with these type beta units on Overclocked AMD chips?

BETA_ dg01_ a089_ pcb009_ 1--

I had a Invalid on one system and on my 1055T I had errors and it seemed to kill BOINC(WCG stopped running and the UI had no info in it. The messages and tasks tabs were empty). This happened 3 times.

There appeared to be no problems on the Intel systems. Coincidence?

These systems have been solid for months and now that the betas are gone everything seems to be back to normal.
[Jul 15, 2011 3:57:03 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

No trouble here, but did see one dg01 [DDDT2] aborted by server. Had not realized that this Beta was circulated with extra copy and mine just sat at end of a 1 days queue. The quicker 2 were valid, plus 1 I'd started manually.

--//--

PS: Now at 145 Days... 22 days advance on this New DL Server test :D

Oh, on switch times to force these short deadline tasks ahead, 7000-7200 minutes is way over top. Subtract cache size from deadline and set value at that. 4500 minutes would be more than enough including the safety margins BOINC uses, to invoke/push high priority processing of repairs/betas. Just try it. :D
[Jul 15, 2011 6:53:06 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

Oh, on switch times to force these short deadline tasks ahead, 7000-7200 minutes is way over top. Subtract cache size from deadline and set value at that. 4500 minutes would be more than enough including the safety margins BOINC uses, to invoke/push high priority processing of repairs/betas. Just try it. :D


Won't work if your cache is less than 7/8 (.875) day on 4 day deadlines. (I use .1 for betas) The simplest method I have found is to set 1440 for each day of deadline. ( 2880 for 2 day, 5760 for 4 day etc.) That will remove cache size from the equation.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by nanoprobe at Jul 15, 2011 12:00:51 PM]
[Jul 15, 2011 11:59:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

That's why I said ''Subtract cache size from deadline" to equate your adapted value, but yes doing true KISS, 1440 for each day of deadline does not fail.

Any client which runs with a 0.1 cache, would get to those ''rush'' jobs in short order... unless there is rush rush. When running with 0.1 cache during a multi-science beta such as now, would miss out on the opportunity to get anything else. I picked up 4 DDDT2, then shortly after got 4 FAAH Beta repairs with a bigger [normal-ish] cache. They sprung ahead of course of the 4 day due Betas... which is fun to watch :D

--//--
[Jul 15, 2011 12:26:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

Did anyone else have troubles with these type beta units on Overclocked AMD chips?

BETA_ dg01_ a089_ pcb009_ 1--

I had a Invalid on one system and on my 1055T I had errors and it seemed to kill BOINC(WCG stopped running and the UI had no info in it. The messages and tasks tabs were empty). This happened 3 times..

My AMD Phenom II X4 610e (not overclocked) had no problem with DDDT2 betas:

BETA_ dg01_ a084_ pr67b0_ 1-- kate-amd64 Valid 7/13/11 22:50:44 7/14/11 09:47:52 3.30 89.9 / 73.0
BETA_ dg01_ a083_ pr34a1_ 0-- kate-amd64 Valid 7/13/11 22:48:34 7/14/11 02:36:05 3.61 98.6 / 105.9
BETA_ dg01_ a083_ pr45b1_ 0-- kate-amd64 Valid 7/13/11 22:48:34 7/14/11 02:36:05 3.68 100.5 / 89.8
BETA_ dg01_ a083_ pr56a1_ 0-- kate-amd64 Valid 7/13/11 22:48:34 7/14/11 02:36:05 3.61 98.5 / 83.6T2
----------------------------------------

[Jul 15, 2011 1:05:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

Questar, simple - just set the "Switch between applications every ..." to 7200 (instead of the standard 60). Then, this'll force WU's with a shorter than normal deadline to the top. It works wonders for me...


Cool, thanks, I'll give this a try.
[Jul 15, 2011 1:20:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

Yes, thanks for keeping us informed smile

Our next project is actually pretty modest in terms of bandwidth requirements. More info about that in the future.


Doesn't sound like it's re-launch of DDDT1/CEP1 wink

But by following past revealed goals, that would entail 2 beta's... one for 32 bits and one for 64 bits, if done consecutive and not concurrent :P

Per noon update in need of 35 days towards ruby worried
[Jul 15, 2011 1:59:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Set of Beta WU's - General System Test, All Sciences

Any client which runs with a 0.1 cache, would get to those ''rush'' jobs in short order... unless there is rush rush. When running with 0.1 cache during a multi-science beta such as now, would miss out on the opportunity to get anything else. I picked up 4 DDDT2, then shortly after got 4 FAAH Beta repairs with a bigger [normal-ish] cache. They sprung ahead of course of the 4 day due Betas... which is fun to watch :D

When it's 1 or 2 betas per core does cache size even matter? I've tried different sizes. It didn't seem to make any difference.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Jul 15, 2011 2:21:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 484   Pages: 49   [ Previous Page | 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread