Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Thread Type: Sticky Thread
Total posts in this thread: 1840
Posts: 1840   Pages: 184   [ Previous Page | 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2168987 times and has 1839 replies Next Thread
Amelior Scout
Cruncher
United States
Joined: Dec 20, 2011
Post Count: 17
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

OOO! I saw something similar to this a while back! It was something to do about kinetic energy collected from people walking on the sidewalks.. Awesome! I've been wanting to hear the developments on this type of tech.. Thanks I'm really glad you posted this! :D
----------------------------------------
~Life is ever-changing~
[May 15, 2012 9:32:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Here are some more details to the White House Materials Genome Initiative from the other day.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files...fact_sheet_05_14_2012.pdf
[May 16, 2012 3:17:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

All right, we have a bit of a backlog on this thread – so let’s get to it:

Dear Sgt.Joe and 5pot:
The computational cost scales roughly with the 3rd or 4th power to with a number of electrons in a molecule and the number of basisfunctions necessary to describe it, respectively. We primarily use the latter in the medium wu basis set. We went up to about 530 functions in a DZP basis before, currently we run molecules with about 480 and we are pretty sure we can go up to 550. 600 should also be possible, but at that point we’ll have to assess how our cruncher machines cope with the stress, i.e., whether I/O and network starts to make trouble and whether we still finish a sufficient fraction of the workunits. Once the molecules get too big for the grid we will change to different workunit design, i.e., we will study different aspects of the candidates.
On the cluster we ran up to 1200 bf molecules but there are only a few cases. We mostly crunch on 700-800 bf molecules right now. The cluster machines have 10s of GB of RAM and are designed for heavy tasks.

Richard – sorry for the tardiness, we didn’t mean to ignore you. Yes, this is interesting science, but not quite aligned with our expertise. But we always appreciate your posts wink

Best wishes from
Your Harvard CEP team
[May 16, 2012 4:27:41 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

CNET has also picked up on the Materials Genome Initiative!
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57433772-76...made-high-tech-materials/
[May 17, 2012 1:52:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

On trouble, yesterday watched a CEP2 job upload. [by coincidence] The _4 file was going at 17Kbs. Gave up after 13 minutes eyeing it, when it was at 50%, but if the desire is to double daily results, you'd be in trouble. This Linux usb 3.0 stick based host is only allowed to have 1 of 8 possible at the time. Everything else WCG was flying, so can't say it was the ISP having me fooled.

--//--
[May 17, 2012 2:11:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Check out this Nature Blog article! Enjoy and share.
http://blogs.nature.com/news/2012/05/us-mater...ative-gains-momentum.html
[May 17, 2012 6:54:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7850
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

On trouble, yesterday watched a CEP2 job upload. [by coincidence] The _4 file was going at 17Kbs. Gave up after 13 minutes eyeing it, when it was at 50%, but if the desire is to double daily results, you'd be in trouble. This Linux usb 3.0 stick based host is only allowed to have 1 of 8 possible at the time. Everything else WCG was flying, so can't say it was the ISP having me fooled.

--//--


On a few occasions I have also watched the big CEP2 uploads and they are consistently slower than the other uploads. I had always thought maybe the ISP was throttling the upload due to its size, but based on what you are seeing perhaps I am wrong. thinking

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[May 17, 2012 11:16:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
astroWX
Advanced Cruncher
USA
Joined: Sep 1, 2007
Post Count: 56
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

For what it's worth --
My primary project is CPDN and it has some comm. files which are substantially larger than anything I've encountered here. I have the high-end of locally available DSL and uploads are sometimes as slow as 7KB/s, other times as fast as 85KB/s. At best, some large files go up in 11+ minutes, other times similar files require nearly a half hour.

I've seen downloads as slow as the teens and (rarely) as fast as 750KB/s. (That's for comm. between the US Pacific Northwest and Uni. Oxford in the U.K.) Time of day? Maybe. ISP? Perhaps. However the packets bounce through a lot of hands enroute and every handler has a chance to use its sticky fingers.

Servers at Oxford, thanks to a typically underfunded uni. project, are not infrequently hammered into lethargy. So it goes.

Of course, sometimes slow up-/down-loads originate in my own house, when my boxes step on each other competing for the resource.

Diagnosis, in my estimation, would require far more resources to track-down than I can afford (or care to operate). Better to grin and bear it or, (choose your own metaphor).

[Edited for typo.]
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by astroWX at May 18, 2012 4:54:10 AM]
[May 18, 2012 4:42:29 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Note that there may be some interruptions today as the IBM team does some website and forum database maintenance starting at 14:00 UTC.
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,33171
[May 18, 2012 2:42:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Hi everybody,
we haven't detected any unusually slow uploads on our end and our servers are not nearly at capacity. Maybe there was a bottleneck on the way here or maybe there was a chance spike in uploads at that very moment... But it is good that you keep us posted on this. Please let us know if this problem persists.
Best wishes from
Your Harvard CEP team
[May 18, 2012 2:49:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 1840   Pages: 184   [ Previous Page | 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread