| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: CEP2 beta for windows - Version 6.25 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 311
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Yes, one per two threads. I have it paired with Orbit (also small files) and have seen no bandwidth issues so far. I hope this is not another cruncher unfriendly project.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Mar 22, 2005 Post Count: 839 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
i think it is to help address the performance issue for the windows system. either that or the hang issues. Honestly though, only my systems, I wouldn't let all of my cores run CEP2 at the same time, it KILLS performance
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
i think it is to help address the performance issue for the windows system. either that or the hang issues. Honestly though, only my systems, I wouldn't let all of my cores run CEP2 at the same time, it KILLS performance I'm not sure. Mine seem to be ~2 hours longer than the last go round. Absolutely no problems so far though. Got a second round and still no bandwidth problems when paired with a non-WCG project. Still only 1 per 2 cores which is OK by me. |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Still only 1 per 2 cores which is OK by me. Same here.
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
  |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Still only 1 per 2 cores which is OK by me. Same here. Hey Nano! Are you seeing longer run times  Other than that it looks like deja vu with the last one for me. Cheers. |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Still only 1 per 2 cores which is OK by me. Same here. Hey Nano! Are you seeing longer run times Other than that it looks like deja vu with the last one for me. Cheers.Hard to say Dataman. I had run times from 5 hours to 11.31 hours on the first batch. The 2 that are PV from this trickle are about 9-10 hours each. I have 11 more in progress so I won't know the results until tomorrow morning.
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
|
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Still only 1 per 2 cores which is OK by me. Same here. Hey Nano! Are you seeing longer run times Other than that it looks like deja vu with the last one for me. Cheers.Hard to say Dataman. I had run times from 5 hours to 11.31 hours on the first batch. The 2 that are PV from this trickle are about 9-10 hours each. I have 11 more in progress so I won't know the results until tomorrow morning. Thanks much Nano! Same here ... 6-9 on the first one ... looks like 9-11 on this group. Still no bandwidth issue ... I almost feel deprived.   Cheers! |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
As far as the bandwidth limits go, we are likely going to be adopting the 6.10 client shortly. It includes a feature that lets you set your max data transferred. We will modify the server so that if you are using a 6.10 client and have set that field then we will ignore the bandwidth check. This will make sure that people are protected from excess data transfers.
|
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
As far as the bandwidth limits go, we are likely going to be adopting the 6.10 client shortly. It includes a feature that lets you set your max data transferred. We will modify the server so that if you are using a 6.10 client and have set that field then we will ignore the bandwidth check. This will make sure that people are protected from excess data transfers. OUTSTANDING!   |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Still only 1 per 2 cores which is OK by me. Same here. Hey Nano! Are you seeing longer run times Other than that it looks like deja vu with the last one for me. Cheers.Hard to say Dataman. I had run times from 5 hours to 11.31 hours on the first batch. The 2 that are PV from this trickle are about 9-10 hours each. I have 11 more in progress so I won't know the results until tomorrow morning. Thanks much Nano! Same here ... 6-9 on the first one ... looks like 9-11 on this group. Still no bandwidth issue ... I almost feel deprived. Cheers!I know bandwidth is going to be an issue for some people. That 80% suggestion I told you about before comes from the old WinMx and open nap networks dial up days. I think anything less than a 1 meg upload (like me) is going to take some bandwidth management. Especially if you have multiple multi core machines on this project.
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by nanoprobe at Sep 22, 2010 2:29:14 AM] |
||
|
|
|