| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2 Forum
Thread: New thread for It's raining Dengue, Hallelujah!... |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 2370
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Punchy
Advanced Cruncher Texas Joined: Nov 30, 2010 Post Count: 60 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
It seems that my two most capable machines (24 cores each) are being limited to 1 task at a time, while my smallest system has a queue of work for its 12 cores. One of the underutilized ones is Linux, one is Windows. Can anyone explain why the bigger ones get only 1 unit at a time?
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
ccandido
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jun 22, 2011 Post Count: 182 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
All my machines are getting one or two at most at a time.
----------------------------------------Don´t know if it is a project distribution policy...   |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Yes!
--//-- |
||
|
|
ccandido
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jun 22, 2011 Post Count: 182 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks SekeRob.
----------------------------------------I have returned approx 35 WU (valid or pending) Four other WU have errored out after 30 mins to 1,5 hours running. [Edit 1 times, last edit by ccandido at Jun 22, 2012 1:02:06 PM] |
||
|
|
BSD
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 27, 2011 Post Count: 224 Status: Offline |
All my machines are getting one or two at most at a time. Don´t know if it is a project distribution policy... Yes! Yep, getting a little sprinkle intermittantly accross 1 Linux and 3 Windows devices. No ground saturation during this event.  Probably helps to better spread the work around. |
||
|
|
bikermatt
Cruncher Joined: Jun 3, 2010 Post Count: 2 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
It seems that my two most capable machines (24 cores each) are being limited to 1 task at a time, while my smallest system has a queue of work for its 12 cores. One of the underutilized ones is Linux, one is Windows. Can anyone explain why the bigger ones get only 1 unit at a time? My 24 and 32 core Linux boxes were the only ones getting work overnight. 325 tasks so far!!  |
||
|
|
Punchy
Advanced Cruncher Texas Joined: Nov 30, 2010 Post Count: 60 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
There's something funny going on. I see posts from people with 70 pages of completed units already. My 12-core system has 54 tasks, while my 24-core systems have 1 task each.
----------------------------------------So, if there is a distribution policy, it's not working evenly. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I guess that´s my post on our home forum Punchy.
Its not 70 pages of completed units, but 70 pages all together (incl. in process). On some rigs i have managed to get a nice queue going , and on others it just keeps the cores busy with maybe 5 or less queued up |
||
|
|
Punchy
Advanced Cruncher Texas Joined: Nov 30, 2010 Post Count: 60 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Well at least you have all cores busy... I've got 23 idle cores on a dedicated crunching system.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Completely brilliant:
3234 World Community Grid 22-6-2012 16:22:43 This computer has finished a daily quota of 10 tasks None started, they're behind a good days worth of DSFL/CFSW queue, and the quad has exactly 40, 10 per core :D. (regrettably, the short sq/sr have the same long runtime estimate as the pr/pq/pl/pc [5 hours], so will let the esses run first when it's their time. That will really drop the buffer total quickly, and get the quota up ;P --//-- |
||
|
|
|