Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum Thread: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 108
|
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Great graphic, thanks for the reply! You're saying that you're at 4.5 GHz, I have a NHU12P, i want to oc but not too much (thinking about power consumption), so let's say I oc at 3.8/4GHz, 3 hours/WU would be a good number no ?
|
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
With half of the projects slowed and delayed from resume, records on the other sciences are piling up, particularly Clean Water. Have a look at the top of thread crunching chart.
Tonight an intermediate milestone is being passed of 35 million results validated, and we're only on Target04 of a possible 99. Personally hoping that as the work progresses, the scientists will be able to steer this towards areas of greater interest... leap-frogging so to speak to later programmed targets. Crunching On [just 165 days away from Sapphire ;O] --//-- |
||
|
dango
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jul 27, 2009 Post Count: 307 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Sek,
this is for me new information, that stop batch will be 99. how many wus are within 1 target batch? because target04 is running for long period and it makes project without end :) thanks |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hi dango,
Don't know, but remember a tech post discussing the batch name/numbering structure. On that note, it's always nice to see a member asking for someone else, volunteer or salaried, to invest time in one or the other none-essential tidbit such as compiling the batch name/number structure for all sciences and no-one stepping up to the plate... when joined WCG and started participating on the forums there were more. Not that it would reveal total work available as some sciences just run ''per experiment'' and several are definitely open-ended... long as WCG is willing to host, the sciences continues to proof worthy and enough will contribute time, they will be around such as FAAH and HPF2. At any rate, IIRC, the names of C4CW tasks were designed so they can handle targets up To target99. Each second I get older, and me mind too ;>) --//-- |
||
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1261 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: |
I have 04_092076664 in my tasks list. How far through target 04 are we & how do you tell the batch & task numbers apart? Thanks
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Speedy51,
As I wrote in me previous post, no one is stepping up to the plate, but the information is for most all sciences on the forums... the DDDT2 is even stickied, so who's the search skilled member to do this? Here's what uplinger wrote last on the matter for C4CW: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/...ead,29787_offset,0#293865 Summary, 99 targets with 99,999,999 "possible" jobs, "just in case". There's really no saying if they will go all the way or make intermediate discoveries and hop to a different target. Done with FAAH and HPF2 in past. --//-- |
||
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1261 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: |
Thanks for info. Happy crunching everyone
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
wiesel111
Cruncher Joined: Aug 14, 2010 Post Count: 3 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
There is something going wrong. I see the charts of CEP2 at the beginnig of the thread.
|
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
/o\
Been battling with a few array searches during the conversion, then DSFL jumping in when not finished with the stats machine recoding... will correct itself once I've finished. Sorry for any inconvenience. --//-- |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
OK, if you hit Ctrl-F5 ** you will be seeing the latest, which shows that Computing for Clean Water just yesterday passed the 20,000 CPU years contributed Milestone.
Thanks all for contributing to this project. --//-- ** Some browsers refuse to fetch a new copy until the cache has been cleared. |
||
|
|