| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum
Thread: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 108
|
|
| Author |
|
|
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Post Count: 1027 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I find that c4cw gets a lower priority of WUs if you request more than just 1 project at a time. Patrick I've noticed that, too. I want one of my machines to run C4CW, HCMD2, and HCC; and another one to run C4CW and HFCC. In both cases, I find that every couple of days, I have to set them to receive only C4CW for a half day or so, or I get hardly any C4CW WUs. CEP2 is the opposite -- when I try to run it in combination with other projects, I get almost entirely CEP2 if I don't babysit.  |
||
|
|
Thomas Klauset Aurdal
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Apr 27, 2007 Post Count: 63 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Question (Q): What does 12% Calendr at the bottom right corner means? Have we completed over 12% already?
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by Thomas Klauset Aurdal at Nov 26, 2010 8:29:21 PM] |
||
|
|
Hammerburg
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 161 Status: Offline |
just pushing this Thread up
----------------------------------------
Lieber einen guten Freund verprellt als auf einen Scherz verzichtet!
|
||
|
|
johncmacalister2010@gmail.com
Veteran Cruncher Canada Joined: Nov 16, 2010 Post Count: 799 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Pretty neat chart
----------------------------------------  crunching, crunching, crunching. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro (part time) |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The
Pretty neat chart reveals, that the 64 bit crunched share has helped to push the mean WU processing time down from 5 hours "flatter than Kansas" average to 4.85 hours...3% faster.Pretty neat too :D See http://bit.ly/WCGART for a more clear [focussed] visualization and how other projects are doing in run times... the FAAH undulation is intriguing as it is not synchronized with any calendar cycle. --//-- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
At the brink of starting Target04, last night we just passed the substantial milestone of 25 million results validated... 25,073,046 exact for 13,145 CPU years.
Crunching On --//-- |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Maybe due to a somewhat slower Proteome Folding share [might be aftermath of last weeks project share rebalancing?], the Clean Water research could be heading for a new day-record... 70.5 +/- 1. current record was set on May 17 with 69.6 CPU years.
What else, Crunching On! --//-- |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Maybe due to a somewhat slower Proteome Folding share [might be aftermath of last weeks project share rebalancing?], the Clean Water research could be heading for a new day-record... 70.5 +/- 1. current record was set on May 17 with 69.6 CPU years. What else, Crunching On! --//-- This is something I have been wondering about since I started WCG. Forgive me if this has been asked before but i could not find it. All of this talk about "Project Share" and "Feeder Priority" Implies that there are only a certain number of tasks that can be sent out at once. That there is a bottleneck that depends on these factors. When I run CEP2 or any other project, am I a net gain for the project or am I taking WU from someone else? Stated differently, are there X tflops worth of CPU power going after <X worth of WU? |
||
|
|
petehardy
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 4, 2007 Post Count: 318 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
cjmc45321988,
----------------------------------------If you choose to crunch for one, any or all of the Active Projects you will, under normal circumstances, be able to fill your cache, without any problem.  "Patience is a virtue", I can't wait to learn it! |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7576 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Stated differently, are there X tflops worth of CPU power going after <X worth of WU? I believe that under normal circumstances the number of WU available far exceeds the capacity of the grid to crunch them. I am sure there are capacity constraints but I think I read somewhere that WCG has the capacity to handle at least twice the volume of what we are now crunching. Perhaps one of the techs could lend their expertise to this question. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
|