Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum Thread: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 108
|
Author |
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3294 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
By looking to other charts from other projects we made 0.1%.
----------------------------------------AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Mar 22, 2005 Post Count: 839 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
hmmm, how come my chart still says 0%? I am guessing it is some sort of caching issue.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
nasher
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 2, 2005 Post Count: 1422 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
give it a few days then we can sort out how long this project is likely to run as well as if they decide to add more to it
----------------------------------------right now im enjoying the water |
||
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
give it a few days then we can sort out how long this project is likely to run as well as if they decide to add more to it right now im enjoying the water I just had some more C4CW BETAs show up in my cache. They look like this. Beta Test 6.13 BETA_c4cw_beta3 000382506_0 Beta Test 6.13 BETA_c4cw_beta3 000917561_0 Beta Test 6.13 BETA_c4cw_beta3 000845-33_0 Beta Test 6.13 BETA_c4cw_beta3 000816158_0
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
|
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Is this 1% (01%), 0.1% or 0.01% Have we really only another 99 days to go ? My old gray cells tell me that 01% percent for 10 CPU years within 24 hours from launch is kind of not right and the FAQs say it's going to be > 100,000 CPU years, so relax and take a beer.... you'll be having at least a chance to get to bronze. We'll be many weeks into the project before even getting the slightest hint of a extrapolatable end date... 2013, maybe... all depends what limit the scientists set in the sky. FAQ: extract: How much computing power does this project need, and why? Based on the molecular dynamics simulations that the researchers have done up to now, using a cluster of 20 nodes (160 CPU cores) for a couple of months at a time, they estimate that to extend the simulations to water-flow velocities typical of practical nanotube filters, they will require another factor of 400 or more in compute time. And to simulate a representative range of membrane pore sizes would require a further factor of 10, for a total of order 106 thousand single-core-CPU-years. Add on to this a wide variety of contaminants they would like to add to the water in the simulations, and the sky is the limit!
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Aug 24, 2010 9:56:28 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I'll give 300+ days of work per 24 hours after all my CEP2 clear out later today. What in the world did Santa bring you around the first weel of July??? Nice:) 16 x BL460c G6's w/ two 6 core nehalems procs 8 w/ 4 core nehalems another 10 w/ 6 cores on the way, should be delivered end of month. I use WCG as part of my burn in process for new equipment. Have had higher priorities as of late so these servers are still just running BOINC. I am working on an image to push out to all of my non-production machines but it takes time and I'm doing this all after hours. |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Thanks for hooking those [Non-Production] resources up to WCG and using the grid for burn in of anything else that has spare time.
----------------------------------------Tuesday Production Stats: Yesterday: Run Time (y:d:h:m:s) - Day 12:340:05:24:58 Points Generated - Day 13,382,504 Results Returned - Day 50,613 The Computing 4 Clean Water take off is amazing to add rather than substitute contributions. Monday is normally the WCG top day, but Tuesday had 7 CPU years more. Crunching on.
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Mar 22, 2005 Post Count: 839 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
The Computing 4 Clean Water take off is amazing to add rather than substitute contributions. Monday is normally the WCG top day, but Tuesday had 7 CPU years more. Crunching on. Sekerob, I don't think that it is fair to say that the c4cw project boost computing resources. What most likely happen is since c4cw is zero redundancy all of the work went straight to valid, instead of having to wait in PV. This is what happened to my stats. My stats say I did 146 days of crunching, but I know I don't have that many cores up and running. It is just that I am crunching on c4cw most of the day, so I got points for everything I turned in today + a lot from PV. PV can be a pain, I still have 67 pages in PV for DDDT2 alone. While I continue to crunch mostly c4cw (current beat is basically c4cw too) and my PV still has a lot of WU to clear out, I will be reporting a lot more points then I would normally generate. I believe this is also what is happening in WCG in general. |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
That is surely an element. I've not worked out last nights' stats distribution and many will have been suspending their wingman dependent tasks which then will have caused others to have longer waits. Meantime of the 24 odd done, I've got 4 in PV and 2 in inconclusive. That's 25% waiting on bufferers that probably run their work normal / sequential and were auto opted in, so there may be individual exceptional effects, but across the whole population that's different. The confitrmation will be the active members and device stats in the coming days.
----------------------------------------Anyway, we celebrate the first 50,000 WU's with very few reports of problems.
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
rwremote
Cruncher U.K. Joined: Aug 27, 2009 Post Count: 36 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
My old gray cells tell me that 01% percent for 10 CPU years within 24 hours from launch is kind of not right and the FAQs say it's going to be > 100,000 CPU years, so relax and take a beer.... you'll be having at least a chance to get to bronze. We'll be many weeks into the project before even getting the slightest hint of a extrapolatable end date... 2013, maybe... all depends what limit the scientists set in the sky. Thanks for explanation Sekerob, the chart has also changed to 0.000001% I see. Your charts are invaluable for people like me who have low end systems and have to "plan" which projects to crunch and when. (To be able to get a badge or two). Oh, its a small glass of Vino Rosso this end, beer is for when the snow is thick outside . . . . . |
||
|
|