Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 108
Posts: 108   Pages: 11   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 26465 times and has 107 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

cjmc45321988,

Everyone can crunch as many ''full active'' WCG research work units of one or the other without impeding any other member i.e. no one is taking away from anyone.

If the multi-science mix does not get enough of one or the other science to get to a contribution target X months in the future, switch to single / exclusive crunching. WCG techs will take care you'll be getting them.

If supplies temporary stalls due a feeder crunch, just let the client do the job. It will keep asking for the researches selected until it has the cache filled to at least it's X days setting.

Feeder priorities need to be managed because the duration of tasks of different sciences vary AND members change their contribution and selection all the time. Can't put equal numbers in the feeder as else in CPU time for instance FAAH/HPF2 would push other sciences to the side. If one would select a mix of FAAH and HCC, ideally one would see a ratio of e.g. 1:8 or so. If the supply is momentarily not there, it will be later backfilled with some extra. The server systems tracks how much a client does and tries to balance over time... kind of a STD/LTD (Short/Long Term Debt) method, but then maintained on the server, similar to a client tracking STD/LTD if a client is attached to 2 grids and both are set to receive 50%.

Hope this helps to take away your concern.

--//--

edit: Note this is the very simplified condensed lay version.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 30, 2011 2:15:23 PM]
[May 30, 2011 2:09:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

And May 31 we put a new day record down of 71.4 CPU years, bettering the last one of May 27 by a notch. Goes with a continued increase of the 7 day average results as well, and a day record of 129,988 results validated in 24 hours.

This is what we do, crunch of course ;>)

--//--

PS, Clean Energy also did a day record!
[Jun 1, 2011 6:34:05 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
rose Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

you are great,good night!
[Jul 2, 2011 1:38:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
applause Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

Muhammad Ali [fka Cassius Clay] was the Greatest :O)

This noon, July 6, a project milestone was passed at 30 million validated results... all computed for Cleaner Water.

Crunch On.

--//--
[Jul 6, 2011 12:58:35 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mindworks.hu
Cruncher
Joined: Nov 19, 2010
Post Count: 8
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

Do we know the percentage of the completeness and how many days left?
[Jul 6, 2011 9:27:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
mfbabb2
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
Post Count: 361
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

----------------------------------------
Murphy

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by mfbabb2 at Jul 6, 2011 10:51:53 PM]
[Jul 6, 2011 10:50:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

In the future when hopefully the results of this project will help to provide clean water for the developing world, how many of them will realise that thanks to the humble PC that they have clean water?
[Jul 7, 2011 4:39:29 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

Quick question: how much time does it take you to complete a Target04 WU with all 8 threads enabled on a Core i7 2600K?
Thanks!
[Aug 1, 2011 8:47:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher
New Zealand
Joined: Nov 4, 2005
Post Count: 1261
Status: Recently Active
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

Quick question: how much time does it take you to complete a Target04 WU with all 8 threads enabled on a Core i7 2600K?
Thanks!

I'm not sure. On a stock I7 980X 3.33Ghz a target 04 task with HT on 12 tasks running Win7 64 tasks take between 4 hours 10 minutes 46 seconds & 4 hours 12 minutes 04 seconds. If my PC runs for 12 hours I can add over 6 days of run time to C4CW. Hope this is helpful.
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 3 times, last edit by Speedy51 at Aug 1, 2011 9:58:09 PM]
[Aug 1, 2011 9:49:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: The "Computing for Clean Water" Crunching Chart

Quick question: how much time does it take you to complete a Target04 WU with all 8 threads enabled on a Core i7 2600K?
Thanks!



at 4.5

[Aug 1, 2011 10:27:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 108   Pages: 11   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread