Climate emails inquiry: Energy consultant linked to physics body's submission

Evidence from Institute of Physics drawn from energy industry consultant who argues global warming is a religion
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/ma...ute-of-physics-submission

It's hard to believe it's nearly 2 years when the lowest point was reached since 2005. Oddly, the ONI and SOI and ENSO charts firmly put the finger on several robust La Nina events since... so if there is an El Niño this time, DA, being the cause of the 2010 warming, could it have been...?

Odd news for from the Catholic University of Tilburg... their study observed that at least 1C of rise has been suppressed due to air pollution, more generally known as global dimming [You very well had one of your ROFLMAO events gloating about the effect of cleaning air, DA, or did you not?]. We've not forgotten about the ABC clouds over Asia now have we? Yes, and they do well exceed for volcanic injections... Bad thing is, we can do something about the anthropogenic elements! Anyway, to compensate, those researcher reckon we've got to reduce CO2 output by an extra 50 million tonnes annual extra (peanuts on 9.4 GT annual CO2 emission into the atmsphere from fossil fuel burning), to stay on the prayed for, lets not hope more than 2C increase by the time our grandchildren start to become seniors.

Me thinketh, therefore I ammeth!

edit: some spellchecking
edit2: correct special character mangle.

So 97% of climate scientists are wrong (and/or part of the conspiracy) but you, Dave Autumns who is not an expert of (nor has any background in) climate science, is right? Oh the hubris.

In looking on following various melt indicators I wondered if it was possible to know for those not seeing the snow what down to earth signs would be there... the satellites observing, for yesterday displaying that North American snow is rapidly disappearing (all that red):

Daily Departure - March 16, 2010 (Day 75)


Sure enough there is a track called Red River where snow-melt run-off translates in acute water levels rise, the sign of sings and it over the decades moving earlier and earlier... no DA & co, not straight line, in leaps and bounds. Here the picture what happened there:



As it is, this one local climatologists a boder of draught for the SW of the USA later in the year.

Also I mentioned the Rockies and the outlook for farmers to have less melt water available for irrigation of the lands this coming NH growth season. Here a link to an article in USA Today's climate section:

Water shortages may hit northern Rockies

March 11 it appeared... just when that Red River started rising.

It's True I say and 75% agree [that's called consensus based on unhindered availability of information that cannot be shouted out by the Moncktonists]

PS: Here's latest Dr. Roy Spencer's AMSU temp readings for the past 13 years [what would a climate post be without a temp chart. 2010 looks to be cooking where that little square left upper half... just 1.05 warmer than last year:



The good Dr. [his name printed bottom of above chart] had the epiphany that not the big city UHI's cause temp reading distortions [or USHI]... no, it's those rural weather stations... yes, he dismisses his own Sat readings... the left hand not knowing what the right hand was writing in yesterdays bulletin. It must be the weather not cooperating with the wishful thinking.

dear marysduby, Watts is coinventer of the JY special protective glasses. He's been debunked so often that most visitors there are the buyers of those... and he's making money with every hit to his site, yours too. See the adds?

Here's how he fools you... the old Global / Local switch he does so often. Top global, Bottom, regional. The MCA/MWP was, mostly Europe:


As for the top of the chart, don't be surprised to find that it is not a as was presented in the IPCC AR4 report. It's worth a read, without the JY glasses of course.