The alien dude is pretty cute.
Oh, I get it, you are laughing at the Illuminati thing again. Or the Freemasons, or whatever...
**

**edited for intolerance** tkh

On the outside chance, one might ask, where the purple bars came from in my charts. Well, they're an evolution at least from the next chart David Autumns (DA) posted in that removed 7336 posts long thread [some gave a sigh at the time]. He made this rather had scratching point (to me and some), that showing 20 years was enough (though DA had long been explained many a time that to see climate change above the weather noise, it needed at 30 years... 30 discrete data points).



Note there's no source reference in the chart, but it was DA's well accepted HADCRUT3v.

I took that at the time as-is and went to show not only global, but also identifying the Northern And Southern Hemisphere parts. North is where ~90% of humans live, South the other ~10%. It's kind of logical as most land mass is on the NH where also the largest amount of temperate climed land is suitable for agricultature, mostly grains and lately lots of corn for bio-fuels.



With permission, I'm happy to reproduce the response he gave to this chart in all it's original splendor. The summation is, he thanked me for making his point. Except, a former CA noted that DA was fooled only absorbing the green trace line, calling it underhanded what I'd done. It merely followed the top of the global temps per HadCCRU, it just designed to drive a point home, and it did. DA may remember, or not, this just as having recorded history on hand for later erörterung.

At any rate, DA's HADCRU is under investigation for a 100 different contrived xxxxGates based on stolen emails from the University of East Anglia and annotations in software scripts which were strictly for private research exploration, but never used in actual published temperature data and charts, so are present findings. When that was evident, HADCRUT3v was updated from Sept'09 to Dec'09 to show this (there's no 2010 temp data in this version though the header prints 1 month 2010)



Dr. Phil Jones has been prosecuted the McCarthy style, except the many reconstructions since have evidenced that whatever Dr. Jones did, it can only have had but minute impact of the lowest insignificance, as all and every reconstruction done shows: Temps are on the way up, with or without sunspots. Anyone who wishes to see global cooling may... it makes no difference whatsoever. The BAUees will be served with a bill larger than any tax bill. 2010 is looking to become... well the weathermen will tell us in the coming 6 months, but if the guys of Wattergate are amongst them is not clear. Even Lucia Lindgren now has a reconstruction up showing the temp charts are sound and irrefutable.

To be continued...

PS: MIT study shows windmills puts the break on airflow causing local warming. Better NIMBY that.

You keep repeating that, yet you DA, have no evidence, zippo zilch, and repeating the Ain't True ad infinitum is not going to have the problem go away.

The last charts are HADCRU btw, case you missed it... those don't measure the largest risen areas... the Polar regions. You full well know that, yet you fail to admit it... bring on your sea ice charts, showing yesterdays weather. Remember though, do they jive with compress and grind? Sea Ice Extent is NOT area and NOT volume. You might want to read Spencer Waerts' The Discovery of Global Warming, repeatedly. Bet you 10 quatloos you wont make it past the prologue.

I have no evidence zippo zilch that the figures are massaged

LOL

OK you asked for it. I might take some time to gather together all those URL (there are so many) but today I am busy chilling.


I will be back

Rest assured

Dave

p.s. how's your disappearing North Pole? :-)

When we're busy doing something, as being busy chilling is unhealthy, it should take no effort me thinketh, a letter came in from a reader at Real Climate. Verbatim:

He kind of nailed it and took the effort, maybe even reading Spencer Waert's The Discovery of Global Warming.
(did not read any comments, but low and behold, the first comment to that letter. A prolific statistician too thinking it's nailing it right on the head.)

DA, you lament science as not being what it used to be. Well, whatever 'science' you learned, it's not what I learned, before you did! Science finds answers, your science has the answer and then goes out to find the science with the answer for the desired outcome. Face it, it's inconvenient and comes with a bill for the past. If we, that can see don't watch out you'll drag us all onto Amy's downhill... till then we're on that Brownian Motion, uphill.