Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 283
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Though Dave has disabled the Windows serving job, one of his machines does, he can't just switch off and not stay up to date on the premonitions of MSFT. Spoiling maybe the TGIF preps to a stress less weekend, the world series for October 2006 were announced:
----------------------------------------Microsoft to Issue 11 Security Patches * Six Microsoft Security Bulletins affecting Microsoft Windows. The highest Maximum Severity rating for these is Critical. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer. Some of these updates will require a restart. * Four Microsoft Security Bulletins affecting Microsoft Office. The highest Maximum Severity rating for these is Critical. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer. These updates may require a restart. * One Microsoft Security Bulletin affecting Microsoft .NET Framework. The highest Maximum Severity rating for this is Moderate. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer and the Enterprise Scan Tool. These updates may require a restart. Microsoft Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool * Microsoft will release an updated version of the Microsoft Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool on Windows Update, Microsoft Update, Windows Server Update Services and the Download Center. Note that this tool will NOT be distributed using Software Update Services (SUS). Non-security High Priority updates on MU, WU, WSUS and SUS * Microsoft will release No NON-SECURITY High-Priority Updates for Windows on Windows Update (WU) and Software Update Services (SUS). * Microsoft will release two NON-SECURITY High-Priority Updates on Microsoft Update (MU) and Windows Server Update Services (WSUS).
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11!
----------------------------------------Surely this trend should be downwards are these 11 new bugs introduced by last months fixes or have they been in there since year dot but no one had noticed before ![]() What are the odds on another genuine advantage? ![]() |
||
|
GEORGE DOMINIC
Senior Cruncher Joined: Nov 21, 2004 Post Count: 227 Status: Offline |
i think it means youve got a copy of windows 64 bit 2004 or your out
mind you the big chips are missing |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Nothing showed up yet at my PC backdoor, but at Slashdot (link from Washington Post) they already know the gory details:
----------------------------------------IT: Microsoft Plugs a Record 26 Security Holes Posted by samzenpus on Tuesday October 10, @08:22PM from the there's-another-one dept. Security An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft today released ten patches to fix at least 26 separate security holes , including a whopping 16 flaws in Microsoft Office and its constituent apps. According to Washingtonpost.com's Security Fix blog, this is the most number of patches ever released by Redmond outside of a Windows service pack. Also of note, six of today's updates apply to fully patched Windows XP systems, and two of the flaws are actually present in Windows Vista." * Read More... * 101 of 129 comments * it.slashdot.org Errata: 2 Vista Patches included too!
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Oct 11, 2006 7:39:20 AM] |
||
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
bucket loads of fixes - windows, office and sql server
----------------------------------------everything appears to be working (again) ![]() |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
This is funny:
----------------------------------------DOS 2.0: GOOD DOS 3.0: BAD DOS 3.3: GOOD DOS 4.2: BAD DOS 5.0: GOOD DOS 6.0: BAD DOS 6.22: GOOD Windows 3.0: BAD Windows 3.1: GOOD Windows 95: BAD Windows NT & 98: GOOD Windows ME: BAD Windows 2000 & XP: GOOD Windows Vista: ? By all historical repetition the latter will be ...... Remember my first PCXT with DOS 1.0 and single sided 160kb floppy drive.....that was short-lived.....Lotus Symphony ran in 512kb...that was a stretch so upgraded to 640kb and ran that for years until memory compression became fashionable. IE7, supposedly Phishing proof had it first Spoof. Been running Spoofstick extension together with Netcraft for long time FFx....at least independent security ;>) ketch u laeter Edit for Didactylos.... replaced '/' with '&' and forgot to provide the source.....a link thru from the TechRepublic site....lived thru them all. Still funny, but that's the cultural divide ;>)
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Oct 28, 2006 12:57:52 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hmmm, would be funny if it were remotely true. But that's about as accurate a representation of MS OSs as.... well, I can't think. Since when was Windows NT/98 an operating system? NT is a whole branch of the MS tree, and 98 was the last gasp of the DOS line (ME was a sick joke).
I remember using NT 3.51 for years, before I gratefully upgraded to NT 4. |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7693 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Still have a working XT machine. Lotus 123/dBase/Wordperfect still work well on it. A 360k floppy and a 20mb harddrive. Green screen.
----------------------------------------Probably about $3,000.00 new in 1983/1984?? Was free at a garage sale at least 10 years ago. Cheers Sgt.Joe
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
A mere 6 updates this coming Tuesday, Nov.14, 2006. There's no telling if the latest zero day holes affecting IE for all supported OSses will be fixed as well.
----------------------------------------Security Bulletin Advance Notification Updated: November 9, 2006 Security Bulletin Advance Notification As part of the monthly security bulletin release cycle, Microsoft provides advance notification to our customers on the number of new security updates being released, the products affected, the aggregate maximum severity and information about detection tools relevant to the update. This is intended to help our customers plan for the deployment of these security updates more effectively. In addition, to help customers prioritize monthly security updates with any non-security updates released on Microsoft Update, Windows Update, Windows Server Update Services and Software Update Services on the same day as the monthly security bulletins, we also provide: • Information about the release of updated versions of the Microsoft Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool. • Information about the release of NON-SECURITY, High Priority updates on Microsoft Update (MU), Windows Update (WU), Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) and Software Update Services (SUS). Note that this information will pertain ONLY to updates on Microsoft Update, Windows Update, Windows Server Update Services and Software Update Services and only about High Priority, non-security updates being released on the same day as security updates. Information will NOT be provided about Non-security updates released on other days. NOTE: Microsoft Software Update Services (SUS) is slated for retirement on 6 December 2006. The November 2006 Monthly Bulletin release is the last Monthly Bulletin release that will be supported by SUS. SUS customers are urged to complete their upgrades to Windows Server Update Services 2.0 (WSUS) before the December 2006 Monthly Bulletin release on 12 December 2006. For more information on WSUS, please see http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/updateservices/default.mspx. On 14 November 2006 Microsoft is planning to release: Security Updates • One Microsoft Security Bulletin affecting Microsoft XML Core Services. The highest Maximum Severity rating for this is Critical. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer. These updates will require a restart. • Five Microsoft Security Bulletins affecting Microsoft Windows. The highest Maximum Severity rating for these is Critical. These updates will be detectable using the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer and the Enterprise Scan Tool. Some of these updates will require a restart. Microsoft Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool • Microsoft will release an updated version of the Microsoft Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool on Windows Update, Microsoft Update, Windows Server Update Services and the Download Center. Note that this tool will NOT be distributed using Software Update Services (SUS). Non-security High Priority updates on MU, WU, WSUS and SUS • Microsoft will release No NON-SECURITY High-Priority Updates for Windows on Windows Update (WU) and Software Update Services (SUS). • Microsoft will release two NON-SECURITY High-Priority Updates on Microsoft Update (MU) and Windows Server Update Services (WSUS). Although we do not anticipate any changes, the number of bulletins, products affected, restart information and severities are subject to change until released.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Gotta have my 2 cents worth here.
Win'98 was a horror and it was impossible to patch. Win'98SE was in many ways a very different operating system and should not be confused with the original. I don't think that they shared much other than the look and the name. I was involved in Windows 98 Beta, to a small extent and MSFT was under so much pressure to get it out of the door that they simply ignored the testers. BTW, I liked Windows 95. At least if it went wrong one could turn to the DOS editor. ![]() Cheers. ozylynx ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |